Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:52:47.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Chemistry for the Sol-Gel Process: Acetone as a New Condensation Reagent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Subhash C. Goel
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
Michael Y. Chiang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
Patrick C. Gibbons
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
William E. Buhro
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
Get access

Abstract

A nonhydrolytic sol-gel process that uses acetone as the condensation reagent is described. In the new process, the hydrocarbon soluble Zn(OCEt3)2 is converted to a rigid, transparent gel and then to ZnO by an aldol-condensation-elimination sequence. The chemical pathway for the transformation has been established, and differs completely from the pathway for the conventional hydrolytic sol-gel processing of alkoxide precursors. The new, nonhydrolytic strategy may prove applicable to a variety of metal-alkoxide systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hench, L. L. and West, J. K., Chem. Rev. 90, 33 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Livage, J., Henry, M. and Sanchez, C., Prog. Solid Stale Chem. 18, 259 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Sanchez, C. and Livage, J., New J. Chem. 14, 513 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Hubert-Pfalzgraf, L. G., New J. Chem. 11, 663 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Goel, S. C., Chiang, M. Y. and Buhro, W. E., Inorg. Chem. 22, 4646 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Heistand, R. H. and Chia, Y. -H. in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II, edited by Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E. and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 73, Pittsburgh, PA 1986) pp. 9398.Google Scholar
7. Vergés, M. A., Mifsud, A. and Serna, C., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 86, 959 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Nielson, A. T. and Houlihan, W. J. in Organic Reactions, Volume 16, edited by Adams, R., Blatt, A. H., Boekelheide, V., Cains, T. L., Cope, A. C., Cram, D. J. and House, H. O. (Wiley, New York, 1968) pp. 1438.Google Scholar
9. Goel, S. C., Chiang, M. Y. and Buhro, W. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 7069 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Bates, S. E. and Buhro, W. E., unpublished results.Google Scholar