Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:43:05.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization and Constraints in Sonolithography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Paul Campbell
Affiliation:
p.a.campbell@dundee.ac.uk, University of Dundee, Carnegie Physics Laboratory, Ewing Building, Main Campus, Nethergate, Dundee, DD1 4HN, United Kingdom, 01382 384404
Paul Prentice
Affiliation:
p.a.prentice@dundee.ac.uk, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

The violent interaction between pressure driven cavitation nuclei and nearby rigid substrates is usually a troublesome occurrence, giving rise to damage, and often system failure in hydraulic systems. However, the extreme nature of the phenomenon can also be exploited in situations where deliberate wear or erosion of a material is desireable, such as with the application of shock wave lithotripsy to fragment kidney stones in a medical context. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether a system can be designed so as to afford a level of control over cavitation processes, so that other useful applications might arise. Specifically, we looked at controlling single cavitation nuclei, constituted by encapsulated microbubbles, in proximity to a nearby rigid substrate and activated by ultrasound. This was achieved using a novel optical trapping arrangement, which facilitated establishment of an arbitrary, stable, initial spatial configuration for a bubble system. Critically, exercising optical control in such a way meant that a microbubble could be isolated from a resident population during insonation thus ensuring that ‘cross-talk’ with the rest of the bubble population was minimised. We observed, using high speed microphotography at circa one million frames per second that fine microjets are issued from cavitation microbubbles, and these impact the nearby surface, creating indentations of controllable size. Specific applications may arise that exploit this action, which, in the general case we refer to as ‘sonolithography’. However, scaling up the process to activate multiple bubbles at once, may lead to complications arising via the action of secondary radiation forces. We discuss the salient aspects of our preliminary findings on this subject herein.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Prentice, P.A., Cuschieri, A., Dholakia, K., Prausnitz, M.R.. & Campbell, P.A.. Nature-Physics 1 107110 (2005)Google Scholar
2. Prentice, P.A., McLean, D.A., Cuschieri, A., Dholakia, K.,. & Campbell, P.A.. Proc. 3rd IEEEEMBS (Special Topic: MMB, Oahu, Hawaii) 158159 (2005)Google Scholar
3. Prentice, P.A., Burns, J.M., Cuschieri, A.. & Campbell, P.A.. Proc. Inst. Acoustics. 28 (1) (2006)Google Scholar
4. Prentice, P.A., MacDonald, M. P., Cuschieri, A, Dholakia, K. Campbell, P.A.. Proc SPIE 5930, 59300H (2005)Google Scholar
5. Campbell, P.A., Prentice, P.A., Burns, J.M., McLean, D.A., Frank, T.G. & Cuschieri, A.. Proc. Inst. Acoust 28 (1) (2006)Google Scholar
6. Prentice, P.A., Frank, T.G., Cuschieri, A., Spalding, G.C.,. MacDonald, M, Sibbett, W., Dholakia, K., & Campbell, P.A, Optics Express 12 (4) 593 (2004)Google Scholar
7. Prentice, P.A.. PhD Thesis, University of Dundee (2006)Google Scholar
8. Young, F. R.. Cavitation, p 224 (McGraw Hill) (1989)Google Scholar