Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:14:53.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Optimization of InP/ZnS core/shell Nanocrystals and TiO2 Nanotubes for Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2013

Seungyong Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
Rick Eyi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
Mahmood Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
Scott Little
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
Omar Manasreh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The synthesis of InP/ZnS core/shell nanocrystals and TiO2 nanotubes and the optimization study to couple them together were explored for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. InP/ZnS nanocrystals have advantages of tunable optical properties and intrinsic nontoxicity. Highly luminescent InP/ZnS nanocrystals were produced by precursor-based colloidal synthesis for a photosensitizer. In order to improve on air stability, ZnS shell was grown on InP core. The emission peak was observed at 550 nm. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image shows that the nanocrystals highly crystalline and monodisperse. TiO2 nanotube is main inorganic material which is capable of harvesting light as well as being a prominent anode electrode in solar cells. The nanotubular form of TiO2 enhances charge transfer and reduces interfacial charge recombination. Free-standing TiO2 nanotubes were produced by anodization using ammonium fluoride. The free-standing nanotubes were formed under the condition that chemical dissolution speed which depends on fluoride concentration was faster than the speed of Ti oxidation. Electrophoretic deposition was carried out to couple the InP/ZnS nanocrystals with the TiO2 nanotubes. Under an optimized applied voltage condition, the current during the electrophoretic deposition decreased continuously with time. The amount of the deposited nanocrystals was estimated by calculation and the deposited nanocrystals on the TiO2 nanotubes were observed in the TEM.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

O’Regan, B., Grätzel, M., Nature 353, 737 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grätzel, M., Nature 414, 338 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grätzel, M., Hagfeldt, A., Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 269 (2000).Google Scholar
Robel, I., Subramanian, V., Kuno, M., Kamet, P. V., Am, J.. Chem. Soc. 130, 4007, (2008).Google Scholar
Kongkanand, A., Tvrdy, K., Takechi, K., Kuno, M., Kamat, P. V., Am, J.. Chem. Soc. 130, 4007 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhle, S., Shalom, M., Zaban, A., ChemphysChem 11, 2290 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. H., Hsu, Y. C., Chou, H. H., Justin Thomas, K. R., Lin, J. T., Hsu, C. P., Chem.–Eur. J. 16, 3184 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. L., Huang, B. M., Chien, H. T., Chem. Mater. 20, 6903 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, C., Hotchandani, S., Kim, W. Y., Schmehl, R. H., Kamat, P. V., Phys, J.. Chem. B 101, 7480 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niitsoo, O., Sarkar, S. K., Pejoux, C., Ruhle, S., Cahen, D., Hodes, G., Photochem, J.. Photobiol. A 181, 306 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, K., Neale, N. R., Miedaner, A., Frank, A. J., Nano Lett. 7, 69 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliaro, M., Palmisano, G., Ciriminna, R., Loddo, V., Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 838 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D. R., Kamat, P. V., Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 805 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L. and Reiss, P. J. AM. Chem. Soc. 130, 1158811589 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Liu, Y., Yu, B., Zhou, F. and Liu, W., chem. Mater. 21, 11981206 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varghese, O. K., Gong, D., Paulose, M., Grimes, C. A. and Dickey, E. C., J. Mater. Res. 18, 156165 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar