Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:14:46.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oxidized Porous Silicon Moisture Sensors for Evaluation of Microelectronic Packaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. J. Kelly ,
T. R. Guilinger ,
D. W. Peterson ,
M. R. Tuck  and
J. N. Sweet
M. J. Kelly
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
T. R. Guilinger
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
D. W. Peterson
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
M. R. Tuck
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
J. N. Sweet
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
Get access

Abstract

Accurate moisture measurements in microelectronic assemblies are crucial in assessing reliability of integrated circuits (ICs). We describe the fabrication and use of a silicon-based device for evaluation of moisture barrier coatings. The capacitive moisture sensors use oxidized porous silicon (OPS) as the sensing element. Porous silicon (PS) is formed by anodization of Si in hydrofluoric acid (HF). Oxidation of PS in oxygen produces OPS, which is also porous if an appropriate starting microstructure and oxidation treatment are selected. Metallization layers on the OPS and the wafer back complete the capacitor structure. The capacitance of OPS sensors is functionally related to the moisture content of the surrounding atmosphere. For example, the capacitance of one sensor changed from 4 nF/cm2 when exposed to a moisture level of 300 ppm by volume (ppmv) to 36 nF/cm2 at 10,000 ppmv. In addition to this excellent sensitivity, capacitor response to step changes in moisture is rapid and reversible. The sensors are also rugged, as demonstrated by their consistent performance during accelerated testing at 85% relative humidity and 140°C. A silicon nitride IC moisture barrier coating was deposited on sensors of this type after normal ceramic dual in-line packaging. Sensor operability after coating deposition was confirmed following intentional introduction of a pinhole into the moisture barrier coating.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 225: Symposium G – Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics , 1991 , 313
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haack, R. F. and Shumka, A. in Proceedings of the ARPA/NBS Workshop V on Moisture Measurement Technology for Hermetic Semiconductor Devices, edited by Schafft, H. A., Ruthberg, S. and Cohen, E. C., NBS Special Publication 400–69, May 1981, pp. 43–57.Google Scholar
2. Lowry, R. K. and Miller, L. A., U.S. Pat. No. 4 272 986 (16 June 1981).Google Scholar
3. Merrett, R. P., Sim, S. P., and Bryant, J. P.. in Proceedings of IEEE Reliability Physics Symposium, edited by Cheney, G. T. and Woods, M. H., 1980, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
4. Macko, R. F. in Proceedings of the NBS/RADC Workshop on Moisture Measurement Technology for Hermetic Semiconductor Devices, II, edited by Cohen, E. C. and Ruthberg, S., NBS Special Publication 400–72, April 1982, pp. 110–112.Google Scholar
5. Sweet, J. N., Tuck, M. R., Peterson, D. W., and Palmer, D. W. in Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, edited by Beckenbaugh, W. M., 1990, pp. 229–235.Google Scholar
6. Anderson, R. C., Muller, R. S., and Tobias, C. W., Sensors and Actuators A21–A23, 835 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Burkhardt, P. J. and Poponiak, M. R., U.S. Pat. No. 4 057 823 (8 November 1977) and U.S. Pat. No. 4 144 636 (20 March 1979).Google Scholar
8. Guilinger, T. R., Kelly, M. J., and Tsao, S. S. in Silicon-on-Insulator and Buried Metals in Semiconductors, edited by Sturm, J. C., Chen, C. K., Pfeiffer, L., and Hemment, P. L. F. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 107, Pittsburgh, PA 1988) pp. 455–458.Google Scholar
9. Tsao, S. S., Guilinger, T. R., Kelly, M. J., Stein, H. J., Barbour, J. C., and Knapp, J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 67(8), 3842–3847 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Kelly, M. J., Guilinger, T. R., Tsao, S. S., Chambers, W. B., Fischer, G. J., and Sippio, R. R., Proceedings of the IEEE SOS/SOI Technology Conference, edited by Colinge, J.-P. and Davis, G. E., 1989, pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
11. Fong, V. in Proceedings of the ARPA/NBS Workshop V on Moisture Measurement Technology for Hermetic Semiconductor Devices, edited by Schafft, H. A., Ruthberg, S. and Cohen, E. C., NBS Special Publication 400–69, May 1981, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar