Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:36:09.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase Transformation Hysteresis in a Plutonium Alloy System: Modeling the Resistivity during the Transformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Jeffery J. Haslam
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550
Mark A. Wall
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550
David L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550
David J. Mayhall
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550
Adam J. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

We have induced, measured, and modeled the β - α' martensitic transformation in a Pu-Ga alloy by a resistivity technique on a 2.8-mm diameter disk sample. Our measurements of the resistance by a 4-probe technique were consistent with the expected resistance obtained from a finite element analysis of the 4-point measurement of resistivity in our round disk configuration. Analysis by finite element methods of the postulated configuration of α' particles within model σ grains suggests that a considerable anisotropy in the resistivity may be obtained depending on the arrangement of the α' lens shaped particles within the grains. The resistivity of these grains departs from the series resistance model and can lead to significant errors in the predicted amount of the α' phase present in the microstructure. An underestimation of the amount of α' in the sample by 15%, or more, appears to be possible.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Miner, W. N. and Schonfeld, F. W. “Physical Properties,” Plutonium Handbook, edited by Wick, O. J. (Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., 1967) pp. 3157.Google Scholar
2. Faiers, M. E., Loasby, R. G., Ward, B. J., Orme, J. T. and Spicer, B. R., “Transformation kinetics of the a-b and d-a transitions in pure and alloyed plutonium:” in Plutonium 1965, ed. Kay, A. E. and Waldron, M. B. (Chapman and Hall, 1965) pp. 6487.Google Scholar
3. Orme, J. T., Faiers, M. E., and Ward, B. J., “The Kinetics of the Delta to Alpha Transformation in Plutonium Rich Pu-Ga Alloys,” Plutonium and Other Actinides, Ed. Blank, H and Lindner, R. (North-Holland Publishing Co., 1976), pp. 761773.Google Scholar
4. Hecker, S. S. Plutonium Physics Workshop, Los Alamos, N.M. July 1921, 2001.Google Scholar
5. Anderson, J. W. and Gilmore, R. R. Measurement of Alpha Phase Plutonium in Plutonium - 1 w/o Gallium Alloy by Electrical Resistivity. Los Alamos Scientific Report, LA-3332, June 30, 1966.Google Scholar
6. Elliott, R. O., Olsen, C. E. and , Louie, J. Electrical Behavior Below 300°K of Plutonium-rich, Delta-phase Solid Solution Alloys containing Cerium, Aluminum and Zinc. J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 23, 10291044.Google Scholar
7. Joel, J., Roux, C. and Rapin, M. Resistivite Electrique Des Solutions Solids D'Alliages Pu-Ga en Phase A tres Basses Temperatures (4,2-300°K). J. Nucl. Matrls. 40 (1971), 297304.Google Scholar
8. Zocco, T. G., Stevens, M. F., Adler, P. H., Sheldon, R. I., and Olson, G. B., Acta. Metall. Mater. 38, 2275 (1990).Google Scholar