Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:33:23.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PROBING STRAIN FIELDS ABOUT THIN FILM STRUCTURES USING X-RAY MICRODIFFRACTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

C. E. Murray
Affiliation:
I.B.M. T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
I. C. Noyan
Affiliation:
I.B.M. T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
P. M. Mooney
Affiliation:
I.B.M. T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
B. Lai
Affiliation:
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
Z. Cai
Affiliation:
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

The transfer of strain between thin film features and the underlying substrate represents an important factor in the performance and reliability of semiconductor devices, particularly as the distances between these structures decrease. In order to characterize the interaction regions produced in the substrate due to strained thin film structures, we employed synchrotron-based x-ray diffraction techniques to map the enhanced diffracted intensity of the single-crystal Si substrate at sub-micron resolution. The dynamic-to-kinematic transition observed in the scattering of x-rays from deformed crystals makes this technique extremely sensitive to the amount of substrate deformation as a function of position. Measurements were conducted on 1 μm thick Ni dots evaporated onto Si (111) substrates and 0.24 μm thick, heteroepitaxially grown SiGe strips of various widths on Si (001). The interaction field resolved by the enhanced Si diffracted intensity in the substrate extended up to 100 times the thickness of these features. Although the boundary of the interaction field varied as a function of feature width, a characteristic curve was generated to describe the decay rate of enhanced Si diffracted intensity when the distance from the feature edge is normalized by a mean interaction distance (MID). The rate of decay of the strain fields predicted by traditional treatments of the mechanical interaction between the thin film and substrate did not correspond to the measured decay rates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lang, A.R., J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1748 (1959)Google Scholar
2. Blech, I.A. and Meieran, E.S., J. Appl. Phys. 38, 2913 (1967)Google Scholar
3. Noyan, I.C., Wang, P.C., Kaldor, S.K., Jordan-Sweet, J.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2352 (1999)Google Scholar
4. Tsusaka, Y., Yokoyama, K., Takeda, S., Urakawa, M., Kagoshima, Y., Matsui, J., Kimura, S., Kimura, H., Kobayashi, K., Izumi, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. P.t 2, 39, L635 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Murray, C.E., Noyan, I.C., Mooney, P.M., Lai, B., Cai, Z., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4163 (2003)Google Scholar
6. Meyerson, B.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 797 (1986)Google Scholar
7. Hu, S.M., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 4661 (1979)Google Scholar
8. Atkinson, A., Johnson, T., Harker, A.H. and Jain, S.C., Thin Solid Films, 274, 106 (1996)Google Scholar
9. Chen, W.T. and Nelson, C.W., IBM J. Res. Develop. 23, 179 (1979)Google Scholar
10. Suhir, E. J. Appl. Mech., 56, 595 (1989)Google Scholar
11. Brantley, W.A., J. Appl. Phys. 44, 534 (1973)Google Scholar