Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:10.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing of Clay/Epoxy Nanocomposites with A Three-Roll Mill Machine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Asma Yasmin
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Processing of Composites, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208–3040, U.S.A.
Jandro L. Abot
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Processing of Composites, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208–3040, U.S.A.
Isaac M. Daniel
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Processing of Composites, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208–3040, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In the present study, a three-roll mill machine was used to disperse/exfoliate the nanoclay particles in an epoxy matrix. The compounding process was carried out with varying mixing time and concentrations of clay particles (1 to 10 wt.%). It was found that the longer the mixing time, the higher the degree of intercalation. Mechanical properties, XRD and TEM were used to characterize the nanocomposites. Elastic modulus was found to increase with increasing clay content, however, the tensile strength was not found to vary accordingly. Compared to conventional direct and solution mixing techniques, the compounding of clay/epoxy nanocomposites by a three-roll mill was found to be highly efficient in achieving higher levels of intercalation/exfoliation in a short period of time and also environmentally friendly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wang, Z., and Pinnavaia, T.J., Chem. Mater. 10, 3769 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Vaia, R.A., Ishii, H. and Giannelis, E.P., Chem. Mater. 5, 1694 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Wei, C.L., Zhang, M.Q., Rong, M.Z. and Friedrich, K., Comp. Sci. Tech., 62, 1327 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Jiankun, L., Yucai, K., Zongneng, Q., and Xiao-Su, Y., J. Polym. Sci: Part B, 39, 115 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Zerda, A.S., and Lesser, A.J., J. Polym. Sci: Part B, 39, 1137 (2001)Google Scholar
6. LeBaron, P.C., Wang, Z., and Pinnavaia, T.J., J. App. Clay Sci., 15, 11 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Kornmann, X., Lindberg, H., and Berglund, L.A., Polymer 42, 1303 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Vaia, R.A., Jandt, K.D., Kramer, E.J. and Giannelis, E.P., Chem. Mater., 8, 2628 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Nam, P.H., Maiti, P., Okamoto, M., Kotaka, T., Hasegawa, N. and Usuki, A., Polymer, 42, 9633 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Liu, X. and Wu, Q., Polymer, 42, 10013 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Fornes, T.D., Yoon, P.J., Keskkula, H. and Paul, D.R., Polymer, 42, 9929 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Nanocor, Inc., Technical data.Google Scholar
13. Yasmin, A., Unpublished work.Google Scholar