Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:35:58.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Evaluation of the Interfacial Free Energies at A Solid-Liquid Lamellar Eutectic Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

W. F. Kaukler  and
J. W. Rutter
W. F. Kaukler
Affiliation:
Universities Space Research AssociationSpace Sciences Laboratory NASA, Marshall Space Flight CenterAlabama, USA35812
J. W. Rutter
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials ScienceUniversity of TorontoToronto, Ontario, Canada M5S IA4
Get access

Abstract

The solid-liquid interfacial free energies of each of the individual phases comprising the eutectic system, Carbon Tetrabromide-Hexachloroethane, were measured as a function of composition using a “grain boundary groove” technique. Thermodynamic data were combined with groove shape measurements made from high resolution optical photomicrographs of the solid-liquid interfaces to give the interfacial free energy data. An interfacial free energy balance at the eutectic trijunction was performed to obtain all the forces acting on that point. The three interphase interfacial free energies at the eutectic trijunctions as well as a solid-solid phase boundary torque were evaluated.

It was found that the solid-liquid interfacial free energies of the two phases of the eutectic could be evaluated from photomicrographs of growing or stationary eutectic interfaces. In addition, it was found that for a substantial range of freezing conditions the eutectic interface shape can be predicted from a knowledge of the interfacial free energies alone.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 12: Symposium L – In Situ Composites IV , 1981 , 305
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nash, G. E. and Glicksman, M. E., “A General Method for Determining Solid-Liquid Interfacial Free Energies ”, Phil. Mag. 24 (1971) p. 577.Google Scholar
2. Schaefer, R. J., Glicksman, M. E., Ayers, J. D., “High Confidence Measurement of Solid/Liquid Surface Energy in a Pure Material,” Phil. Mag. 32 (1975) p. 725.Google Scholar
3. Jones, D. R. H., “The Measurement of Solid-Liquid Interfacial Energies from the Shapes of Grain Boundary Grooves,” Phil. Mag. 27 (1973) p. 569.Google Scholar
4. Jackson, K. A., Hunt, J. D., “Transparent Compounds that Freeze like Metals,” Acta Met. 13 (1965) p. 1212.Google Scholar
5. Jackson, K. A. and Hunt, J. D., “Lamellar and Rod Eutectic Growth,” Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 236 (August 1966) p. 1129.Google Scholar
6. Kaukler, W. F., “A Quantitative Study of Factors Influencing Lamellar Eutectic Morphology During Solidification,” PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, January 1981 or NASA TM-82451, November 1981.Google Scholar
7. Hunt, J. D., Jackson, K. A., and Brown, H., “Temperature Gradient Microscope Stage Suitable for Freezing Materials with Melting Points Between –100 and 100°C,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 37 (6) (1966) p. 805.Google Scholar
8. Glicksman, M. E., “Direct Observation of Solidification,” Chapter 6, p. 155, Solidification, ASM, 1971.Google Scholar
9. Herring, C., “Surface Tension as a Motivation for Sintering,” p. 143 in The Physics of Powder Metallurgy, Kingston, W. E., ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y., 1951.Google Scholar
10. Hoffman, D. W. and Cahn, J. W., “A Vector Thermodynamics for Anisotropic Surfaces I,” Surface Science 31 (1972) p. 368.Google Scholar
11. Cahn, J. W. and Hoffman, D. W., “A Vector Thermodynamics for Anisotropic Surfaces II,” Acta Met. 22 (1974) p. 1205.Google Scholar
12. Tiller, W. A., “Polyphase Solidification,” p. 276 in Liquid Metals and Solidification; ASM, Cleveland, OH, 1958.Google Scholar
13. Boiling, G. F. and Tiller, W. A., “Growth from the Melt. I. Influence of Surface Intersections in Pure Metals,” J. Applied Physics 31 (8) (August 1960) p. 1345.Google Scholar