Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:40:08.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Stability of Dibenzo-21-Crown-7 Used for Solvent Extraction of Cesium-137

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

V. M. Abashkin ,
E. A. Filippov ,
A. K. Nardova ,
I. V. Mamakin  and
G. F. Egorov
V. M. Abashkin
Affiliation:
Russian Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 33 Kashirskoe Ave., Moscow 115230, Russia
E. A. Filippov
Affiliation:
Russian Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 33 Kashirskoe Ave., Moscow 115230, Russia
A. K. Nardova
Affiliation:
Russian Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 33 Kashirskoe Ave., Moscow 115230, Russia
I. V. Mamakin
Affiliation:
Russian Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 33 Kashirskoe Ave., Moscow 115230, Russia
G. F. Egorov
Affiliation:
Russian Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 33 Kashirskoe Ave., Moscow 115230, Russia
Get access

Abstract

Crown ether Dibenzo-21-crown-7 (DB-7) has demonstrated a high capability for removing cesium-137 both from acidic and alkaline solution. However, there is a very important problem concerning changes in physical and chemical properties of such mixtures as a result of high irradiation. High radiation doses may cause a decrease in extraction efficiency and selectivity, formation of hazardous radiolysis products, disturbance hydrodynamics, and even decay of extractant. It is necessary to estimate such changes before extraction testing on “hot” solutions.

A special procedure, earlier developed in the RRICT (Russian Ministry for Atomic Energy), was used for testing of radiation and chemical stability of extraction mixtures. This method is based upon continuous control of extraction parameters - distribution coefficients of the specified radionuclides, their hold-up in organic phase, of hydrodynamic properties - kinetics of separation of mixed phases, surface tension, etc., and formation of radiolysis products.

The dose rate, determined using a ferrosulfate dosimeter was 1.7 W*h/l (1.05*1016 eV/ml*s) taking into account the electronic density of organic solution. Maximum total dose of gamma-irradiation was 80 W*h/l (1.6* 1021 eV/ml). The specimens of irradiated organic solution - DB-7 in the mixture of fluorinated alcohol (FA) and higher alcohol - after phase separation were analyzed to determine the hydrodynamic parameters. Both organic and aqueous phases were analyzed to estimate the decay of extractant and the composition of radiolysis products.

The primary emphasis for the first radiolytic experiments was given to the estimation of the FA decay by means of measuring the fluoride-ion concentration in the aqueous phase. It was shown that this value increases through the dose of 60 W*h/l and then decreases again. Such behavior may be attributed to an interaction of the fluoride ion with nitric acid and formation of volatile or organic phase extractable compounds. Our tests performed on real HLW acid solutions in P/A “Mayak” also demonstrated that solutions of DB-7 in fluorinated alcohols have a high resistance to radiolysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 1291
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pedersen, C.J. and Frensdorff, H.K., Int. Ed. Eng., 11, p. 16 (1967).Google Scholar
2. Coordination Chemistr, of Macrocvclic Polyethers, edited by Melson, G.A. (Plenum Press, NY 1979).Google Scholar
3. Filippov, E.A.; Yakshin, V.V, Belov, V.A., Arkhipova, G.G., Abashkin, V.M., Laskorin, B.N., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 241, 159, (1978).Google Scholar
4. Abashkin, V.M., Yakshin, V.V., Laskorin, B.N., DokI. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 257, 1374 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Filippov, E.A., Yakshin, V.V., Abashkin, V.M., Radiokhimiya (Rus.), 24, 214 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Laskorin, B.N., Yakshin, V.V., Zh. Vses. Khirm. Obcshecstva (Rus.), 30, 579 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Horwvitz, E.P., Dietz, M.L., and Fisher, D.E., Solv.Extr.Ion Exch., 8, 557 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Moyer, B.A., Baes, C.F., Bryan, S.A., in: Proceedings of the 1st Hanford Separation Science Workshop, 11, 39 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Filippov, E.A, Dzekun, E.G., Nardova, A.K., et al., in Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Waste Management at Tucson, AZ, 2, 243 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Abashkin, V.M., Nardova, A.K., Egorov, G.F., Mamakin, I.V., and Filippov, E.A. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by Gray, W.J. and Triay, I.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, Pittsburgh, PA 1996), p. 595–600.Google Scholar
11. Bardov, A.I., et al./ U.S.S.R. Patent No.1693438 (July 22, 1991).Google Scholar
12. Mamakin, I.V., et al./ U.S.S.R. Patent No. 1706661 (Sept. 22, 1991).Google Scholar