Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:28:25.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RBS/Channelinc and Tem Analysis of Thin Sandwiched EPI-Layers of Germanium on Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

M.L. Swanson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255
N.R. Parikh
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255
E.C. Frey
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255
G.S. Sandhu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255
W.K. Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255
J. Mccaffrey
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada KIA 0R6
T.E. Jackman
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada KIA 0R6
Get access

Abstract

Si/Ge/Si (100) structures consisting of a thin epitaxial layer of Ge (1-64 monolayers) on Si and covered with a 5 nm overlayer of epitaxial Si were grown by MBE. The layers were analyzed by Rutherford backscattering(RBS)-channeling and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). For structures containing 4 or 8 monolayers of Ge, the channeling <110> angular scans showed unusual features that could be due to imperfect steering of the ion beam in the thin Si overlayer. Cross sectional TEN showed that the Ge epitaxy was good for these Ge thicknesses, but that for an average Ge coverage of 16 monolayers, Ge hillocks up to 90 monolayers thick occurred.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Osbourn, G.C., Biefeld, R.M., and Gourley, P.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 172 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bevk, J., Mannaerts, J.P., Feldman, L.C., Davidson, B.A., and Ourmard, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 286 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Picraux, S.T., Chu, W.K., Allen, W.R., and Ellison, J.A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B15, 306 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chu, W.K., Allen, W.R., Ellison, J.A. and Picraux, S.T., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B13, 39 (1986)Google Scholar
5. Feldman, L.C., Bevk, J., Davidson, B.A., Gossmann, H.-J., and Mannaerts, J.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 664 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Bevk, J., Ourmazd, A., Feldman, L.C., Pearsall, T.P., Bonar, J.M., Davidson, B.A., and Mannaerts, J.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 760 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. People, R. and Bean, J.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 322 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Tsao, J.Y., Dodson, B.W., Picraux, S.T., and Cornelison, D.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2455 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Kasper, E. and Herzog, H.-J., Thin Solid Films 44, 357 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kohama, Y., Fukuda, Y., and Seki, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 380 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Baribeau, J-M., Jackman, T.E., Houghton, D.C., Maigne, P., and Denhoff, M.W., Appl. Phys. 63, 5738 (1988)Google Scholar
12. Lockwood, D.J., Dharma-Wardana, M.W.C., Aers, G.C. and Baribeau, J.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 2040 (1988)Google Scholar
13. Stevens, J.L.E., Robinson, B.J., Davies, J.A., Thompson, D.A. and Jackman, T.E., J. Appl Phys. (in press)Google Scholar
14. Lockwood, D.J., private communication.Google Scholar