Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T20:17:09.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reactive Transport Modeling of Radionuclide Source-Terms in an Underground Spent Fuel Disposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

L. De Windt ,
H. Catalette  and
J. M. Gras
L. De Windt
Affiliation:
Centre for Geological Computer Sciences, Paris School of Mines, rue Saint-Honoré 35, 77305 Fontainebleau, France
H. Catalette
Affiliation:
Electricité de France, Research and Development Division, Les Renardières, 77818 Moret sur Loing, France.
J. M. Gras
Affiliation:
Electricité de France, Research and Development Division, Les Renardières, 77818 Moret sur Loing, France.
Get access

Abstract

The reactive transport model HYTEC was used to simulate the migration over 100,000 years of cesium, americium and uranium released from spent fuel packages in the near-field components of an underground stiff clay disposal site. A global equilibrium thermodynamic approach including kinetic control of the spent fuel pellets was used with instantaneous release fractions and congruent dissolutions of the rim and the core zones. A failure scenario of the waste package after 10,000 years was considered with magnetite as the main corrosion product. The retention properties of magnetite and the different effects of bentonite and cementitious backfill materials were specifically analysed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 807: Symposium Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII , 2003 , 743
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. De Windt, L., Cabrera, J. and Boisson, J.-Y., “Radioactive Waste Containment in Indurated Claystones: Comparison between the Chemical Containment Properties of Matrix and Fractures”, Geological Society of London 157, 167–181 (1999).Google Scholar
2. van der Lee, J., De Windt, L., Lagneau, V. and Goblet, P., “Module-oriented modeling of reactive transport with HYTEC”, Comp. Geosc. 29, 265–275 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Röllin, S., Spahiu, K., and Eklund, U.B.. “Determination of dissolution rates of spent fuel in carbonate solutions under different redox conditions with a flow-through experiment”, J. Nucl. Mat. 297(3), 231–243 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Pellegrini, D. and De Windt, L., “Assessment of Geochemical Containment Properties in the Near-field of a Deep Underground Repository”, Scient. Basis Nucl. Waste Manag., Boston, US (Dec. 2002).Google Scholar
5. Shoesmith, D.W., “Fuel corrosion processes under waste disposal conditions”, J. Nucl. Mat. 282, 1–31 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Berner, U., “Concentration limits in the cement based Swiss repository for long-lived, intermediate-level radioactive wastes (LMA)”, Techn. rep. 99–10, PSI (1999).Google Scholar