Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:41:02.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reactivity of C60 in Fuming Sulfuric and Chlorosulfonic Acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

G.P. Miller ,
M.A. Buretea ,
J.W. Swirczewski  and
J.M. McConnachie
G.P. Miller
Affiliation:
Corporate Research Laboratory, Exxon Research & Engineering Company, Route 22 E, Annandale, N.J. 08801
M.A. Buretea
Affiliation:
Corporate Research Laboratory, Exxon Research & Engineering Company, Route 22 E, Annandale, N.J. 08801
J.W. Swirczewski
Affiliation:
Corporate Research Laboratory, Exxon Research & Engineering Company, Route 22 E, Annandale, N.J. 08801
J.M. McConnachie
Affiliation:
Corporate Research Laboratory, Exxon Research & Engineering Company, Route 22 E, Annandale, N.J. 08801
Get access

Abstract

C60 is sultonated in fuming sulfuric acid and chlorinated in chlorosulfonic acid. Both reactions involve initial oxidation of C60 followed by in situ trapping of electrophilic C60 cation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 349: Symposium T – Novel Forms of Carbon II , 1994 , 115
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Xie, Q., Perez-Cordero, E. and Echegoyen, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 3978.Google Scholar
2. See for example: (a) Penicaud, A., Hsu, J. and Reed, C.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6698; (b) Stinchcombe, J., Penicaud, A., Bhyrappa, P., Boyd, P.D.W. and Reed, C.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5212; (c) Fullagar, W.K., Gentle, I.R., Heath, G.A. and White, J.W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. 1993, 525.Google Scholar
3. Xie, Q., Arias, F. and Echegoyen, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 9818.Google Scholar
4. Kukolich, S.G. and Huffman, D.R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 182, 263.Google Scholar
5. Miller, G.P. Chemistry & Industry, 1993, (7), 226.Google Scholar
6. Miller, G.P., Hsu, C.S., Thomann, H., Chiang, L. and Bernardo, M. Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 1992, 247, 293.Google Scholar
7. Thomann, H., Bernardo, M. and Miller, G.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6593.Google Scholar
8. Miller, G.P., Buretea, M.A., Bernardo, M.M., Hsu, C.S. and Fang, H.L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. 1994, in press.Google Scholar
9. Miller, G.P., Swirczewski, J.W., Buretea, M.A. and McConnachie, J.M. Tett. Lett. 1994, submitted.Google Scholar
10. Roberts, D.W. and Williams, D.L. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 1027.Google Scholar
11. Knunyants, I.L. and Sokolski, G.A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1972, 11,583.Google Scholar
12. Elemental analysis on fully hydrated 1 performed by Quantitative Technologies Incorporated, Whitehouse, New Jersey. Found: 55.37% C, 13.02% S, 1.29% H; TGA: 12.0% H2O. Calculated for C60(SO3)5.30·(H2O)8.69: 55.37% C, 13.06% S, 1.34% H, 12.03% H2O.Google Scholar
13. Birkett, P.R., Avent, A.G., Darwish, A.D., Kroto, H.W., Taylor, R. and Walton, D.R.M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. 1993, 1230.Google Scholar
14. Hirsch, A., Li, Q. and Wudl, F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 1991, 30, 1309.Google Scholar
15. Miller, G.P., Millar, J.M., Liang, B., Uldrich, S. and Johnston, J.E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. 1993, 897.Google Scholar