Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:21:33.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simple Use of SiO2 Film Thickness for the Control of Carbon Nano-Tube Diameter During Ferrocene Catalyzed CVD Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

N. Chopra ,
P.D. Kichambare ,
R. Andrews  and
B. J. Hinds
N. Chopra
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506–0046, USA
P.D. Kichambare
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506–0046, USA
R. Andrews
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506–0046, USA
B. J. Hinds
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506–0046, USA
Get access

Abstract

Selective growth of carbon nano-tubes (CNT) on micron scale patterned substrates has been accomplished by taking advantage of the non-reactivity of ferrocene catalyst on H-terminated Si surfaces in a CVD process. Demonstrated here is that this phenomenon can be used to control the diameter of CNTs when sufficiently narrow lines of SiO2 surrounded by H-terminated Si are used. Narrow lines of SiO2 (12–60nm) are formed at the etched face of a Si/SiO2/Si multilayer structure. This allows the precisely controllable thickness of an SiO2 film to determine an exposed SiO2 line width. There is no need for e-beam lithography since film thickness determines nm-scale line dimensions. CNTs are then formed by CVD with a ferrocene/H2/Ar mixture at 700°C. CNTs are observed to grow only on the exposed SiO2 surface at the edge of the ‘mesa’ structure. CNT diameters of 13.2, 20.5, 34.2, 64.3nm are observed for SiO2 film thickness of 12, 19, 35, and 65 nm. The larger distribution of CNT diameter with increased line width is consistent with wider SiO2 linewidths not being able to affect smaller nucleation centers. These results are consistent with the use of self-assembly chemistry of iron catalyst onto nano-particles of catalyst support.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 739: Symposium H – Three-Dimensional Nanoengineered Assemblies , 2002 , H7.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bachtold, A., Hadley, P., Nakanishi, T., and Dekker, C., Science, 294, 1317 (2001)Google Scholar
2. Chang, H.,; Lee, J. D., Lee, S. M., and Lee, Y. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 79, 3863 (2001)Google Scholar
3. Williams, P. A., Papadakis, S. J., Falvo, M. R., Patel, A. M., Sinclair, M., Seeger, A., Helser, A., Taylor, R. M., Washburn, S., and Superfine, R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 80, 2574 (2002)Google Scholar
4. Cassell, A. M., Franklin, N. R., Tombler, T. W., Chan, E. M., Han, J., and Dai, H. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 7975–7976 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Franklin, N. R. and Dai, H. J., Adv. Mater. 12, 890–894 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Andrews, R., Jacques, D., Rao, A. M., Derbyshire, F., Qian, D., Fan, X., Dickey, E. C., and Chen, J., Chem. Phys. Lett. 303, 467–474 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Sinnott, S. B., Andrews, R., Qian, D., Rao, A. M., Mao, Z., Dickey, E. C., and Derbyshire, F., Chem. Phys. Lett. 315, 25–30 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Ho, G. W., Wee, A. T. S., Lin, J., and Tjiu, W. C., Thin Solid Films 388, 73–77 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Hernadi, K., Fonseca, A., Nagy, J. B., Bernaerts, D., Fudala, A., and Lucas, A. A., Zeolites 17, 416–423 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Hernadi, K., Fonseca, A., Piedigrosso, P., Delvaux, M., Nagy, J. B., Bernaerts, D., and Riga, J., Catal. Lett. 48, 229–238 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Wei, B. Q., Zhang, Z. J., Ajayan, P. M., and Ramanath, G., Carbon 40, 47–51 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Wei, B. Q., Vajtai, R., Jung, Y., Ward, J., Zhang, R., Ramanath, G., and Ajayan, P. M., Nature 416, 495–496 (2002).Google Scholar
13. Qian, D. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kentucky (2001)Google Scholar
14. Rao, A. M., Jacques, D., Haddon, R. C., Zhu, W., Bower, C., and Jin, S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 3813 (2000).Google Scholar