Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:14:09.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanodiamond Solutions using Photothermal and Fluorescence Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Gour Pati
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Engineering, Delaware State University, Dover, DE – 19901, U.S.A.
Z. Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Engineering, Delaware State University, Dover, DE – 19901, U.S.A.
M. J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Engineering, Delaware State University, Dover, DE – 19901, U.S.A.
A. Marcano
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Engineering, Delaware State University, Dover, DE – 19901, U.S.A.
Renu Tripathi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Engineering, Delaware State University, Dover, DE – 19901, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Absorption, scattering and fluorescent properties of several different types of nanodiamond samples are measured to characterize them for various applications. Two different methods, spectrophotometry and photothermal spectroscopy were used to measure absorption properties of nanodiamonds suspended in aqueous solutions. Photothermal spectroscopy provides the advantage of measuring absorption of photoactive nanodiamonds with high-sensitivity. Spectral fluorescence properties of nanodiamond samples were studied using a commercial spectrofluorometer and a home-built inverted microscope integrated with a light-sensitive imaging spectrograph. Characteristic fluorescence spectrum of nitrogen-vacancy defects in single diamond nanocrystals was obtained using the light-sensitive instrument.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Faklaris, O., Garrot, D., Joshi, V., Boudou, J-P., Sauvage, T., Curmi, P.A., and Treussart, F., J. Eu. Opt. Soc. 4, 09035 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, C. C., Lee, H. Y., Chen, K., Lim, T.-S., Wu, H.-Y., Lin, P.-K., Wei, P.-K., Tsao, P.-H., Chang, H.-C., and Fann, W., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 727 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelezko, F., Tietz, C., Gruber, A., Popa, I., Nizovtsev, A., Kilin, S., and Wrachtrup, J., Single Mol. 2, 255 (2001).3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelezko, F., and Wrachtrup, J., Phys. Stat. Sol.(a) 203, 3207 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrachtrup, J., and Jelezko, F., J.Phys.: Conden. Mat. 18, S807 (2006).Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, G., Chan, I. Y., Kolesov, R., Al-Hmoud, M., Tisler, J., Shin, C., Kim, C., Wojcik, A., Hemmer, P. R., Krueger, A., Hanke, T., Leitenstorfer, A., Bratschitsch, R., Jelezko, F., and Wrachtrup, J., Nature 455, 648 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveratos, A., K¨uhn, S., Brouri, R., Gacoin, T., Poizat, J.-P., and Grangier, P., Eur. Phys. J. D 18, 191 (2002).Google Scholar
Marcano, A.O., Delima, F., Markushin, Y., and Melikechi, N., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 281287 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenef, A., Brown, S.W., Redman, D.A., Rand, S.C., Shigley, J., and Fritsch, E., Phys. Rev. B 53, 13427 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar