Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:21:17.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of the Strengthening and the Production of Sigma Phase in 20–9–3 Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

G.A. Honeyman
Affiliation:
N.E.I. Parsons, Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, (formerly Teesside Polytechnic);
T.A. Towers
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering & Metallurgy, Teesside Polytechnic.
Get access

Abstract

It is general practice to weld bullet proof steels with 20Cr-9Ni-3Mo Duplex stainless alloy. Little information is available regarding increasing the strength of these weldments or their response to time at temperatures used for heat treatments. This investigation sought to study possible strengthening mechanisms involving silicon additions and the effects of heat treating such welds at 1050°C.

A 2% silicon addition gave a 16% increase in strength with approximately equal contributions from stacking fault energy, solute and second phase hardening. However, the ductility was significantly reduced by a high ferrite content. When this δ ferrite content was corrected by cobalt additions a 26% increase in strength was achieved, giving properties very similar to bullet proof steels.

A 1050°C heat treatment programme showed rapid sigma phase formation from δ ferrite but the process was reversed on further heating. This phenomenon was attributed to alloy migration as the weld microstructure approached equilibrium, the hardness of the alloys followed the variation in δ ferrite content being at their heightest at the beginning and end of heat treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Holt, R.M., et al., JISI 200, 715 (1962).Google Scholar
2. Talbot, A.M. and Furmande, , Trans. ASM 45, 429 (1953).Google Scholar
3. Guanieri, , et al., Trans. ASM 42, 981 (1950).Google Scholar
4. Morley, J.T. and Kirkby, J.W., JISI 172, 129 (1952).Google Scholar
5. HM/ENM ‘ARMEX’, Murex Weld Proc. Ltd. (1940).Google Scholar
6. Bain, E.G. and Griffiths, W.E., Trans. AIME 75, 166 (1927).Google Scholar
7. Hall, E.O. and Algie, A.H., Metall. Res. 11, 61 (1966).Google Scholar
8. Duwez, P. and Baen, S.R., Amer Soc. Test Met. (Sp. Pub. 110) 48 (1951).Google Scholar
9. Sulley, A.H., J. Inst. Met. 80, 173 (1951/1952).Google Scholar
10. Betchtoldt, C.J. and Vacher, H.C., J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stds. 58, 7 (1953).Google Scholar
11. Spooner, F.J. and Wilson, C.G., Acta Cryst. 17, 1533 (1964).Google Scholar
12. Tisinai, G.F., et al., J. Metal. 8, 606 (1956).Google Scholar
13. Cook, A.J. and Jones, F.W., JISI 148, 217 (1943).Google Scholar
14. Blenkinsop, P.A. and Nutting, J., JISI 195 145 (1960).Google Scholar
15. Gow, J.T. and Harder, O.E., Trans. ASM 30, 855 (1942).Google Scholar
16. Woodyatt, L.R., et al., Tran. AIME 236, 519 (1964).Google Scholar
17. Barbadillo, de, et al., Int. Ni Co Inc. (1969).Google Scholar
18. Hull, F.C., Weld. J. 52, 104 (1973).Google Scholar
19. Duhay, P., et al JISI 206, 1245 (1968).Google Scholar
20. Spitznagel, J.A. and Stickler, R., Metall. Trans. 5, 1363 (1974).Google Scholar
21. Lippold, J.C. and Savage, W.F., Weld. Res. Supp. 363 (1979).Google Scholar
22. Pickering, F.B., et al., JISI 1017 (1969)Google Scholar
23. Southwick, P., Private Communication , Cambridge University (1982).Google Scholar
24. Lyman, C.E., et al., Scan. Elect. Mic. 1, 213 (1978).Google Scholar
25. Weiss, B. and Stickler, R., Met. Trans. 3, 851 (1972).Google Scholar
26. Thomas, R.G. and Yapp, P., Weld. J. Res. Supp. 12, (1978).Google Scholar
27. Pickering, F.B., ISI Sp. Rep. 64, 118 (1959).Google Scholar
28. Hodgkinson, M, MPhil. Thesis, CNAA, Teesside Polytechnic (1982).Google Scholar