Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:18:14.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Adsorption Kinetics of Ga Wire Arrays on Si(112)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

S.M. Prokes
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C. 20375.
O.J. Glembocki
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C. 20375.
Get access

Abstract

The growth and energetics of Ga chains on a Si(112) facet surface have been investigated. Low energy electron diffraction (LEED) and Reflectance Difference Anisotropy (RDA) experiments have been performed in UHV to examine the kinetics of the Ga atom chain formation process along the Si steps. This is a self-limiting process for substrate temperatures in the 400°C to 500°C range, since the binding energy of the metal atoms at the step edges is greater than that on the (11l)-type terraces. At saturation coverage, the Ga chains exhibit sixfold periodicity along the step edges, but below saturation, these chains exhibit fivefold periodicity. A model has been suggested from these results in which the periodicities of the chains are determined by the metal atom vacancies, which balance the tensile stress created by the larger metal atoms. We have used RDA to study the time evolution of the surface kinetics and changes in the surface reconstruction of Ga deposited on these facet (112) Si surfaces, as a function of substrate temperature and Ga deposition rate. The RDA measurement is shown to be sensitive to the formation of both the 5×1 as well as 6 × 1 reconstructions and to island formation at low substrate temperatures. The diffusion-controlled Ga line formation process at low temperatures has also been characterized as well as the evaporation controlled regime, which is evident at substrate temperatures over 400°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Berghaus, Th., Brodde, A., Neddermeyer, H. and Tosch, St., Surf. Sci. 184, 273 (1987).Google Scholar
2 Jung, Timothy M., Kaplan, R. and Prokes, S.M., Surf. Sci. Let. 289, L577 (1993).Google Scholar
3 Jung, Timothy M., Prokes, S.M. and Kaplan, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A12, 1838 (1994).Google Scholar
4 Yater, J.E., Shih, A. and Idzerda, Y.U., Phys. Rev. B51, 7365 (1995).Google Scholar
5 Glembocki, O.J., Prokes, S.M., Phys. Rev. Lett., submitted.Google Scholar