Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T17:13:09.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Test of Some Statistical Approximations (Quasi Chemical, Cvm) in Bcc and Fcc Binary Alloys by Monte Carlo Simulation. Validity Range of the Clapp and Moss Approximation.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

P. Cenedese  and
J.P. Gaspard
P. Cenedese
Affiliation:
Institut Laue-Langevin, 156X, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France.
J.P. Gaspard
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique, Université de Liège, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, Belgique.
Get access

Abstract

In the framework of regular solution model, we test the validity of some usual approximations (QC, CVM) of entropy in (disordered) binary alloys by Monte Carlo simulation. The validity range of these approximations are explored both in alternant and nonalternant lattice with ferro- and antiferromagnetic coupling. The CVM tetrahedron approximation is also analysed on a structure containing only tetrahedra : the 120 polytope [8] in 3d curved space.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 21: Symposium GREECE – Phase Transformations in Solids , 1983 , 51
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Guggenheim, E.A. “Mixtures”, Oxford University Press, London (1952).Google Scholar
[2] de Fontaine, D. in Solid State Physics, Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D. ed., 34, 73 (1979).Google Scholar
[3] Binder, K. (ed.) “Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics” Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1979).Google Scholar
[4] Wen, S.H., this conference.Google Scholar
[5] Bichara, C., Bengman, C., Gaspard, J.P. and Mathieu, J.C., Scripta Met. 16, 1121 (1982).Google Scholar
[6] Clapp, P.C. and Moss, S.C., Phys. Rev. 142, 418 (1966).Google Scholar
[7] Gratias, G., private communication.Google Scholar
[8] Sadoc, J.F. and Mossari, R., Phil. Mag. B 45, 467 (1982).Google Scholar
[9] Fosdik, L.D., Phys. Rev. 116, 3 (1959).Google Scholar