Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:28:38.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transient creep behaviour of Ni3Al polycrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Tomas Kruml ,
Birgit Lo Piccolo  and
Jean-Luc Martin
Tomas Kruml
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH 1015 Lausanne, SWITZERLAND
Birgit Lo Piccolo
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH 1015 Lausanne, SWITZERLAND
Jean-Luc Martin
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH 1015 Lausanne, SWITZERLAND
Get access

Abstract

Repeated creep tests were used for measuring various constant strain-rate deformation parameters. The results are consistent with those of repeated stress relaxations, although the precision is lower for creep in the present case. The small yield point observed in reloading after the transient is directly related to the amount of exhausted mobile dislocations, i.e. it originates from multiplication processes. During the transient test (180s total), the total exhaustion rate of mobile dislocations can be as high as 99%. It exhibits a maximum at the same T (about 500 K) as the work hardening. This supports the validity of a model which considers the work-hardening peak temperature to correspond to the stress under which incomplete Kear-Wilsdorf locks yield.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 646 , 2000 , N5.13.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Guiu, F. and Pratt, P.L., Phys. Stat. Sol., 6, 111 (1964)Google Scholar
2. Martin, J.L., Lo Piccolo, B. and Bonneville, J., Intermetallics, 8, 1013 (2000)Google Scholar
3. Saada, G., Bonneville, J. and Spätig, P., Mat. Sci. Eng, A234–236, 263 (1997)Google Scholar
4. Pichl, W., Chen, D.L. and Weiss, B., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 167, 43 (1998)Google Scholar
5. Orlova, A., Bonneville, J. and Spätig, P., Mat. Sci. Eng., A 191, 85 (1995)Google Scholar
6. Lo Piccolo, B., Doctorate thesis no 2044, EPFL Lausanne (1999)Google Scholar
7. Matterstock, B., Martin, J.L., Bonneville, J., Kruml, T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 552, KK5.17 (1998)Google Scholar
8. Thorton, P.H., Davies, R.G. and Johnson, T.L., Metall. Trans. 1, 207 (1970)Google Scholar
9. Hemker, K.J., Mills, M.J. and Nix, W.D., Acta metall. mater. 39, 1901 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Uchic, M.D. and Nix, W.D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 460, 437 (1997)Google Scholar
11. Caillard, D., Proc. of ICSMA13, Mat. Sci. Eng. A, in printGoogle Scholar
12. Caillard, D., private communicationGoogle Scholar