Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T22:23:00.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultra-Thin Zirconium Oxide Films Deposited by Rapid Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition (RT-CVD) as Alternative Gate Dielectric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Jane P. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
You-Sheng Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Get access

Abstract

ZrO2 ([.kappa]∼ 18) was deposited on Si(100) wafers by rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RT-CVD) process to replace SiO2 as the gate dielectric material in metal-oxide- semiconductor devices for its high dielectric constant, good thermal stability on silicon, and large bandgap. The deposited films are nearly stoichiometric, amorphous, uniform, and highly smooth, as determined by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, ellipsometry, and atomic force microscopy. The high resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image shows an interfacial ZrSiO4 layer between ZrO2 and the silicon substrate, and this interfacial layer is verified by thermodynamic calculations and etching resistance measured at the interface. Excellent step coverage was observed for depositing ZrO2 on nanometer scale features with an aspect ratio of 4. The dielectric constant of RTCVD ZrO2 was 15-18, with small C-V hysteresis and low leakage current.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Buchanan, D. A.. Stathis, J. H., Cartier, E., et. al., Microelectronic Engineering, 36, 329 (1997).Google Scholar
2 Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 16(1), 356 (1998).Google Scholar
3 Gusev, E. P., Lu, H. C., Gustafsson, T., Garfunkel, E., et. al., J. Appl. Phys., 82(2), 896 (1997).Google Scholar
4 Zhang, K. X., Osburn, C. M., Solid State Electronics, 41(4), 619 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Kobayyashi, K., Inaba, Y., Ogata, T., et. al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(4), 1459 (1996).Google Scholar
6 Chung, S. O., Kim, J. W., Kim, S. T., et. al., Mater. Chem. And Phys. 53 (1), 60 (1998)Google Scholar
7 Hahn, Y. B., Kim, J. W., Youn, C. J., and Lee, I. S., J. Electronic Mater. 26(12), 1394 (1997).Google Scholar
8 Crowell, J. E., Tedder, L. L., Cho, H. C., et. al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 1864 (1990).Google Scholar
9 French, R. H., Glass, S. J., Ohuchi, F. S., Xu, Y. N., Ching, W. Y., Phys. Rev. B 49, 5133 (1994).Google Scholar
10 Balzaretti, N. M., Jornada, J. A. H. da, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9266 (1995).Google Scholar
11International Center for Diffraction Data, JCPDS Powder Diffraction File.Google Scholar
12 Lu, H. C., Gusev, E. P., Gustafsson, T., and Garfunkel, E., Green, M. L., Brasen, D., and Feldman, L. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 (18), 2713 (1996).Google Scholar