Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-xdx58 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T07:18:53.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Constitutes Successful Undergraduate Research?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Colin Inglefield
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Weber State University Ogden, UT, 84408-2508, U.S.A.
Adam Johnston
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Weber State University Ogden, UT, 84408-2508, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Research has become a point of much greater emphasis in the undergraduate science curriculum within the past few generations of undergraduate students. However, there is not universal agreement upon what constitutes a successful undergraduate research program, and how degrees of success should be measured. A model for a successful program based principally on student ownership of research projects will be presented here. This approach is an attempt to give undergraduate students the most holistic research experience possible, by involving them in all stages of a research project in a limited amount of time. A central goal for each student is a definable product of their particular project, which is disseminated to as wide an external audience as possible. Measures of success, from student perspectives, will be discussed. These measures include data from interviews of students before and after their research experience.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mulvey, P. J., and Nicholson, S.Physics and Astronomy Senior Report: Classes of 1999 and 2000” (American Institute of Physics, 2002).Google Scholar
2. Hakim, T. M., “At the Interface of Scholarship and Teaching: How to Develop and Administer Undergraduate Research Programs” (Council on Undergraduate Research, 2000) pp. 6366.Google Scholar
3. Lichter, R. L., “Research is Important, But…”, Academic Excellence: The Role of Research in the Physical Sciences at Undergraduate Institutions, ed. Doyle, M. P. (Research Corporation, 2000) pp. 4153.Google Scholar
4. Gutierrez, J. J., Inglefield, C. E., An, C. P., DeLong, M. C., Taylor, P. C., Morrison, S., Madan, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 664, A3.4.1 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Spilich, G., Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly 18, 57 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Johnston, A., in Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (2004).Google Scholar
7. Ryder, J., Leach, J., and Driver, R., J. Research in Science Teaching 36, 201 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Roehrig, G., Austin, B., Hancock, E. et al. , in Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (2004).Google Scholar