Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:26:07.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Tomographic Microscopy of Nicalon Preforms and Chemical Vapor Infiltrated Nicalon/Silicon Carbide Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. D. Butts
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta CA 30332
S. R. Stock
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta CA 30332
J. H. Kinney
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore CA 94550
T. L. Starr
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta CA 30332
M. C. Nichols
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore CA 94550
C. A. Lundgren
Affiliation:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours, Wilmington DE 19880
T. M. Breunig
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta CA 30332
A. Guvenilir
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta CA 30332
Get access

Abstract

Following the evolving microstructure of composites through all stages of chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) is a key to improved understanding and control of the process. X-ray Tomographic Microscopy (XTM), i.e., very high resolution computed tomography, allows the microstructure of macroscopic volumes of a composite to be imaged nondestructively with resolution approaching one micrometer. Results obtained with XTM on dense SiC/SiC composites and on woven SiC fiber preforms illustrate how details of the densification process can be followed using this technique during interruptions in processing. Ways in which the three-dimensional microstructural information may be used to improve modeling are also indicated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Besmann, T.M., Sheldon, B.W., Lowden, R.A. and Stinton, D.P., Science, 253, 1104 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Bonse, U., Johnson, Q.C., Nichols, M.C., Nusshardt, R., Krasnicki, S. and Kinney, J.H., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A246, 644 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kinney, J.H., Johnson, Q.C., Bonse, U., Nichols, M.C., Saroyan, R.A., Nusshardt, R., Pahl, R. and Brase, J.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Bull., XIII, 13 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kak, A.C. and Slaney, M., Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, (IEEE Press, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
5. Huesman, R.H., Gullberg, G.T., Greenberg, W.L. and Budinger, T.F., Users Manual: Donner Algorithms for Reconstruction Tomography, (PUB-214, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, 1977).Google Scholar
6. Chawla, K.K., Composite Materials Science and Engineering, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987) p. 54.Google Scholar
7. Data sheets, Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, Michigan.Google Scholar
8. International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (Kynoch Press, Birmingham, England, 1972), Vol. 4, p. 61.Google Scholar