Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:32:59.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boundary Lubricant - Functionalized PVA Gels for Biotribological Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Michelle M Blum  and
Timothy Ovaert
Michelle M Blum
Affiliation:
mmichale@nd.edu, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States
Timothy Ovaert
Affiliation:
tovaert@nd.edu, Universirty of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States
Get access

Abstract

A novel material design was developed by functionalizing a biocompatible hydrogel material with organic boundary lubricants. Polyvinyl alcohol was functionalized with varying molar ratios of 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 moles of lauroyl chloride. Tribological and mechanical characterization was performed by means of nanofriction testing and nanoindentation to determine the influence of the hydrocarbon chains on the friction coefficient and elastic modulus of the hydrogels. It was found that fusing of the lubricant to the polymer material has a positive effect on the surface friction properties, yet an unfavorable effect on stiffness properties of the gel due to the processing method.

Keywords

biomimetic (assembly)lubricantpolymer
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1272: Symposia KK/LL/NN/OO/PP – Integrated Miniaturized Materials-From Self-Assembly to Device Integration , 2010 , 1272-PP09-14
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Thomas, B.H., Fryman, J.C., Liu, K., Mason, J.M., Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, (2008), 2, p. 588–595.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.08.001Google Scholar
2 Liu, K., Ovaert, T.C., Mason, J.J., Journal of Material Science: Materials in Medicine, (2008), 15(4): p. 1815–1821.Google Scholar
3 Gong, J.P. and Osada, Y., Progress in Polymer Science, 2002. 27, p. 3–38.10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00037-5Google Scholar
4 Nakashima, K., Sawae, Y., Murakami, T., Tribology International, (2007). 40, p. 1423–1427.Google Scholar
5 Ma, R., Xiong, D., Miao, F., Zhang, J., Peng, Y., >Materials Science and Engineering C, (2009). p. 1979–1983.Materials+Science+and+Engineering+C,+(2009).+p.+1979–1983.>Google Scholar
6 Adhvaryu, A., Biresaw, G., Sharma, B.K., Erhan, S.Z., Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(10), p. 3735–3740.Google Scholar
7 Orienti, I, Zuccari, G., Luppi, B., Zecchi, V. Journal of Microencapsulation, 2001, 18(1), p. 77–87.Google Scholar
8 Roeder, R.K., Converse, G., Leng, H., Yue, W., Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 89(7), 2096–2104 (2006).Google Scholar
9 Miranda, T.M.R., Gonc, A.R., and Amorim, M.T.P.. Polymer International, 2001, 50, p. 1068–1072.10.1002/pi.745Google Scholar
10 Johnson, K. L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar
11 Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., Journal of Materials Research, 1992. 7(6), p. 1564–1583.Google Scholar
12 Thongphud, A., Paosawatyanyong, B., Visal-athaphand, P. and Supaphol, P. Advanced Materials Research Vols. 55–57 (2008), p. 625–628.Google Scholar