Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:28:01.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defect Production Mechanisms During keV Ion Irradiation: Results of Computer Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

R.S. Averback
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Mai Ghaly
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Huilong Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Get access

Abstract

MD simulations have been employed to investigate damage processes during keV bombardment of metal targets. For self-ion irradiations of Au, Cu, and Pt in the range of 5-20 keV, we have found that both the amount and the character of the damage created in the surface depends sensitively on the details of the energy deposition along individual ion trajectories. In all of these cases, significantly more damage is produced and more atomic mixing takes place relative to corresponding recoil events in the crystal interior. In some cases, enormous craters are formed in an explosive event, while in others a convective flow of atoms to the surface leaves dislocations behind. The results of these simulations will be summarized and their significance for damage studies of ion irradiated materials, discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Moldycask is a derivative of Moldy, see Finnis, M.W., Atomic Energy Authority Report No. AERE-R-13182, (1988).Google Scholar
2. Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Foiles, S.M., Baskes, M.I., and Daw, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Ziegler, J., Biersack, J.P., and Littmark, U., in Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985) Vol. 1.Google Scholar
5. Ghaly, M., Smith, A., Benedek, R., and Averback, R.S., unpublished.Google Scholar
6. Ghaly, Mai and Averback, R.S., unpublished.Google Scholar
7. Zhu, H. and Averback, R.S., unpublished.Google Scholar
8. Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Averback, R.S., Benedek, R. and King, W.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1930 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Brinkman, J.A., J. Appl. Phys, 25, 951 (1954); Amer. J. Phys. 24, 246 (1956).Google Scholar
10.see e.g., Andersen, H.H. and Bay, H.L., in Sputtering by Particle Bombardment, ed. Behrisch, R., (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981) Chapter 4.Google Scholar
11. Averback, R. S., Thompson, L. J., Moyle, J. and Shalit, M., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1342 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Johnson, W.L., Cheng, Y.T., VanRossum, M., and Nicolet, M-A., Nucl. Instr. and Meth, B7/8, 657 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Merkle, K.L., in Radiation Damage in Metals, ed. Harkness, S.D. and Peterson, N.L., (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH. 1976) p.58.Google Scholar
14.See e.g., Bacon, D.J. and, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. (in press).Google Scholar
15. Ghaly, M. and Averback, R.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 364 (1994).Google Scholar
16. Trinkaus, H., Rad. Effects 78, 189 (1983).Google Scholar
17. Averback, R.S. and Ghaly, Mai, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3908 (1994).Google Scholar
18. Thomas, L.E., Schober, T. and Balluffi, R.W., Radiat. Effs. 1, 257, 269, 279 (1969).Google Scholar
19. Merkle, K.L. and Jäger, W., Philos Mag. A. 44, 741 (1981); W. Jdiger and K.L. Merkle, Philos Mag. A. 57, 479 (1988).Google Scholar
20. Teichert, C., Hohage, M., Michely, Th. and Comsa, G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 1682 (1994).Google Scholar
21. Rubia, T. Diaz De La and Guinan, M.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2766 (1991).Google Scholar
22. Phythian, W.J., Eyre, B.L. and Bacon, D.J., Philos. Mag. A 55, 757 (1987).Google Scholar