Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T19:54:15.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

omparisons of Silicide Formation by Rapid Thermal Annealing and Conventional Furnace Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

E. Ma
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
M. Natan
Affiliation:
Martin Marietta Laboratories, 1450 S. Rolling Road, Baltimore, MD 21227
B.S. Lim
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
M-A. Nicolet
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Get access

Abstract

Silicide formation induced by rapid thermal annealing (RTA) and conventional furnace annealing (CFA) in bilayers of sequentially deposited films of amorphous silicon and polycrystalline Co or Ni is studied with RBS, X-ray diffraction and TEM. Particular attention is paid to the reliability of the RTA temperature measurements in the study of the growth kinetics of the first interfacial compound, Co2Si and Ni2Si, for both RTA and CFA. It is found that the same diffusion-controlled kinetics applies for the silicide formation by RTA in argon and CFA in vacuum with a common activation energy of 2.1+0.2eV for Co2Si and 1.3+0.2eV for Ni Si. Co and Ni atoms are the dominant diffusing species; during silicide formation by both RTA and CFA. The microstructures of the Ni-silicide formed by the two annealing techniques, however, differs considerably from each other, as revealed by cross-sectional TEM studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. d'Heurle, F. M., Hodgson, R. T. and Ting, C. Y., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 52, (1986) 261.Google Scholar
2. Powell, R. A. and Manion, M. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.., p. 441.Google Scholar
3. See Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 52, Sedgwick, T. O., Seidel, T. E. and Tsaur, B.-Y., eds., and references therein; also C. S. Wei, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1986.Google Scholar
4. Lajzerowicj, J.,Torres, J., Goltz, G. and Pantel, R., Thin Solid Films 140, (1986) 23.Google Scholar
5. Wei, C. S., van der Spiegel, J. and Santiago, J., J. Electrochem. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
6. Lim, B. S., Ma, E., Nicolet, M-A. and Natan, M., J. Appl. Phys., in press.Google Scholar
7. Nicolet, M-A. and Lau, S. S., VLSI Electronics: Microstructure Science, Materials and Process Characterization, Vol. 6, Chap. 6.Google Scholar
8. Lien, C.-D., Nicolet, M-A., Pai, C. S. and Lau, S. S., Appl. Phys. A36, (1985) 153.Google Scholar
9. Lien, C.-D., Nicolet, M-A. and Lau, S. S., Thin Solid Films 143, (1986) 63.Google Scholar
10. Olowolafe., J.O. Nicolet, M-A. and Maver., J. W. Thin Solid Films 38. (1976) 143.Google Scholar
11. Natan, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49 (5), (1986) 257.Google Scholar
12. Vanderwalker, D. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 (11), (1986) 707.Google Scholar
13. Natan, M., Le vide, les couches minces, Vol. 42, No. 236, (1987) 17.Google Scholar
14. Holloway, K. and Sinclair, R., J. Appl. Phys. 61 (4), (1987) 1359.Google Scholar
15. Johnson, W. L. and Meng, W.-J., private communication.Google Scholar