Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:50:57.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doped Polymers as Third-Order Nonlinear-Optical Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Mark. G. Kuzyk
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
U. C. Paek
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Princeton, New Jersey
Carl W. Dirk
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, University of Texas, El Paso, Texas
Mark P. Andrews
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Recently, there has been much interest in doped polymeric materials owing to their suitability for optical device applications.[1] While most of this effort has been centered on poled polymers and their applications to electrooptics, doped polymers are beginning to emerge as a promising material class for all-optical device applications. In this contribution, we discuss the status of doped polymers as third-order optical materials. Particular attention is focused on those properties that make doped polymers attractive as device materials such as optical nonlinearity and loss and their suitability for nonlinear-optical fiber devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1] see for example “New Materials for Nonlinear Optics,” - American Chemical Society, ACS Symposium Series, vol xxx, Marder, S.R., Sohn, J.E., and Stucky, G.D., eds., ACS Washington, D.C., 1990/1991.Google Scholar
2] “Nonlinear Optical Effects in Organic Polymers,” NATO ASI Series, Series E: Applied Sciences - vol 162, Messier, J., Kajzar, F., Prasad, P., and Ulrich, D., eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989.Google Scholar
3] Kuzyk, M. G. and Dirk, C. W., Appl. Phys. Lett 54, 1628 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4] Kuzyk, M. G., Dirk, C. W., and Sohn, J. E., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 842 (1990).Google Scholar
5] Dirk, C. W. and Kuzyk, M. G., Phys Rev A 39, 1219 (1989).Google Scholar
6] Heflin, J. R., Wong, K. Y., Zamani-Khamiri, O., and Garito, A. F., Phys. Rev. B 38, 1573 (1988).Google Scholar
7] Soos, Z. G. and Ramasesha, S., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1067 (1989 Google Scholar
8] Kuzyk, M. G. and Dirk, C. W., Phys. Rev. A 41, 5098 (1990).Google Scholar
9] Dirk, C. W. and Kuzyk, M. G., Chem. of Materials 2, 5 (1990).Google Scholar
10] Hache, F., Ricard, D., and Flytzanis, C., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 3, 1647 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11] Kaino, T., Japanese J. of Appl. Phys. 24, 1661 (1985).Google Scholar
12] Kaino, T., Jinguji, K., and Nara, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 567 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar