Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T13:55:19.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrosynthesis of Magnetostrictive Nanosensor Array

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Suiqiong Li ,
Lisa Orona ,
Liling Fu  and
Z.-Y. Cheng
Suiqiong Li
Affiliation:
lisuiqi@auburn.edu, Auburn University, 275 Wilmore labs, Auburn, AL, 36849, United States
Lisa Orona
Affiliation:
lisaorona@hotmail.com
Liling Fu
Affiliation:
lilingf@auburn.edu
Z.-Y. Cheng
Affiliation:
chengzh@eng.auburn.edu
Get access

Abstract

Magnetostrictive nanobars as sensor platform were induced. Based on the resonance behavior of strips made from thin films, it is identified that the amorphous Fe-B alloy is a good candidate for fabricating high performance sensor platform. The fabrication process of amorphous Fe-B nanobars using electrochemical deposition is reported. The magnetization hysteresis loop of Fe-B nanobars with the diameters of 50, 100 and 200 nm, respectively, was characterized. It is found that, for all nanobars, the coercive field measured along length direction is smaller than the coercive field measured perpendicular to length direction. The physics behind the phenomena is discussed.

Keywords

sensornanoscalemagnetic
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 900: Symposium O – Nanoparticles and Nanostructures in Sensors and Catalysis , 2005 , 0900-O08-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Grate, J. W., Martin, S. J., and White, R. M., Analytical Chemistry, 65, 940A–948A, (1993)Google Scholar
2. Raiteri, R., Grattarola, M., Butt, H. J., and Skádal, P., Sensors and Actuators B, 79, 115–126, (2001).Google Scholar
3. Raiteri, R., Grattarola, M., and Berger, R., Materials Today, 5(1), 22–29, (2002).Google Scholar
4. Ilic, B., Czaplewski, D., Zalalutdinov, M., and Graighead, H.G., Journal of Science &Technology B, 19, 2825–2828, (2001).Google Scholar
5. Grimes, C.A., Kouzoudis, D., Ong, K.G., and Crump, R., Biomedical Microdevices, 2:1, 51–60,(1999).Google Scholar
6. Qing, Y.C., Grimes, C.A., Sensors and Actuators B, 71, 112–117, (2000).Google Scholar
7. Suqiong, Li, Lisa, Orona, Zhimin, Li, and Cheng, Z.-Y., Applied Physics Letter (submitted)Google Scholar
8. Lim, P.B., Fujita, N., Squire, P.T., Inoue, M, and Fujii, T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 451, 495, (1997)Google Scholar
9. Merhaut, J., Theory of Electroacoustics, McGraw-hill International Book Company press, (1981).Google Scholar
10. Liu, Q.F., Gao, C.X., Xiao, J.J., Xue, D.S., Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 260, 151–155 (2003).Google Scholar
11. McGary, P. D. and Stadler, B. J. H., Journal of Applied Physics, 97, 10R503 (2005)Google Scholar