Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:01:26.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Microstructure of ggbfs/OPC Habdened Cement Pastes and Some Effects of Leaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

I.G. Richardson ,
Sally A. Rodger  and
G.W. Groves
I.G. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Sally A. Rodger
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
G.W. Groves
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Ground granulated blast-furnace slag (ggbfs) /Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) blends are possible materials for use in intermediate and low-level radioactive waste repositories. The microstructural development in neat OPC is described. The effect of increasing the loading of ggbfs on the composition and microstructure of the hardened paste has been examined by a number of techniques, including transmission electron microscopy. The implications for performance are discussed. A ggbfs/OPC 9:1 blend which had been exposed, after normal hydration to aqueous leaching was also examined. Marked changes in the microstructure and composition were observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 63
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sersale, R., Marchese, B. and Frigone, G., 7th Int. Cong. Chem. Cen., Paris 1980 II, 111–63.Google Scholar
2. Regourd, M., 7th Int. Cong. Chem. Cemn., Paris 1980, I, 111–2.Google Scholar
3. Hobbs, D. W., Mag. Conc. Res. 38, 191 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Page, C.L., Short, N.R. and Tarras, A. El, Cem. Conc. Res. 11, 395 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Groves, G.W., LeSueur, P.J. and Sinclair, W., J. Am. Cerarn. Soc. 69, 353 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Wilding, C.R. and McHugh, G., AERE-R12297 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Jennings, H.M., in Advances in Cement Technoloqy, edited by Ghosh, S.N. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1983), p.349.Google Scholar
8. Jawed, I., Skalny, J. and Young, J.F., in Structure and Performance of Cements, edited by Barnes, P. (Applied Science Publishers, London, 1983), p.237.Google Scholar
9. Taylor, H.F.W., 8th Int. Cong. Chem. Cem., Rio de Janeiro 1986, I, 2.1.Google Scholar
10. Uchikawa, H., 8th Int. Cong. Chem. Cem., Rio de Janeiro 1986, I, 249–280.Google Scholar
11. Dalgleish, B.J., Pratt, P.L. and Toulson, E., J. Mater. Sci. 17, 2199 (1982).Google Scholar
12 Pratt, P.L. and Ghose, A., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A310, 93 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Bensted, J., Adv. Cem. Res. 1, 35 (1987).Google Scholar
14. Skalny, J., Jawed, I. and Taylor, H.F.W., World Cern. Technol. 9, 183 (1978).Google Scholar
15. Richardson, I.G., Wilding, C.R. and Dickson, M.J., submitted to Adv. Cem. Res. 1989.Google Scholar