Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:47:17.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Plasma Reactor for Solid Waste Treatment on Pecvd Production Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Raoux
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1263, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
M. A. Fodor
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1263, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
W. N. Taylor
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1263, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
D. Cheung
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1263, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
K. Fairbairn
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1263, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
Get access

Abstract

The growth of particulates within a PECVD (Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition) reactor has been extensively studied in recent years. As one of the early concerns was wafer particle contamination, the attention of industry also shifted to environmental issues. In the particular case of Si3N4 film deposition, the amount of dust particles created within the plasma is great and a significant amount of dust is dragged out of the RF interelectrode region along with the exhausted process gases. On a production system, this results in solid residues accumulation in the exhaust line (or foreline), frequent maintenance and poor vacuum pump lifetime. We developed a DPA (Downstream Plasma Apparatus) placed downstream of the deposition chamber to solve the issue of solid waste treatment for thin films applications such as SiO2, Si3N4, SiC, SiOxNy,…, α‐Si,…). The DPA is designed to capture all the residue during deposition, using both a passive and an active mode. It consists of two labyrinth‐shaped electrodes that can trap particles by gravitation (passive) and electrostatically (active) by application of a DC electric field. The second function of the device is to vaporize the previously trapped residues using a periodic plasma assisted clean. The vaporization process is performed by re‐ionizing the effluent PFCs gas (PerFluoro‐Coumpounds) from the processing chamber. All byproducts of the reaction are gaseous and water soluble. This results in the elimination of solid waste as well as improving vacuum pump lifetime. There is also better clean gas utilization and the emission of PFCs in the atmosphere is reduced. In this paper, we review the particulate formation, their size and composition. We describe the DPA reactor designed to trap charged particulates with closed to 100% efficiency. We examine the plasma‐assisted cleaning process and the implications of the device in terms of solid waste treatment and environmental impact.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Formation. Transport and Consequences of Particles in Plasmas. 1994 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3. Institute of Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
2 Garscadden, A., Ganguly, B.N., Haaland, P.D. and Williams, J., 1994 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3 239.Google Scholar
3 Choi, S.J. and Kushner, M.J., 1994 IEEE Transactions on plasma science 22 138.Google Scholar
4 Bouchoule, A. and Boufendi, L., 1994 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3 293.Google Scholar
5 Lieberman, M.A., Lichtenberg, A.J., 1994. Principles of plasma discharges and materials processing. Wiley‐intersci., NY.Google Scholar
6 Flamm, D.L., 1989 Introduction to plasma chemistry. Academic Press.Google Scholar
7 Growth, trapping and abatement of dielectric particles in PECVD systems. Raoux, S., Cheung, D., Fodor, M. A., Taylor, W. N. and Fairbairn, K.. Submitted for publication, 1997 Plasma Sources Sci. and Technol. Google Scholar
8 Haaland, P., Ibrani, S., Jiang, H., 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 1629.Google Scholar
9 Langan, J. et al. Solid state technology 96, 39, 115122.Google Scholar