Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:25:13.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Smart Additives for Self-Sealing and Self-Healing Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2012

Nele De Belie ,
Kim Van Tittelboom ,
Didier Snoeck  and
Jianyun Wang
Nele De Belie
Affiliation:
Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Ghent University, Belgium
Kim Van Tittelboom
Affiliation:
Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Ghent University, Belgium
Didier Snoeck
Affiliation:
Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Ghent University, Belgium
Jianyun Wang
Affiliation:
Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Ghent University, Belgium Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Like broken bones are able to heal themselves, it would be desirable that damaged concrete may be repaired autonomously as high costs are related to the repair. Actually, concrete already has some self-healing properties; when cracks appear, water enters and reacts with unhydrated cement grains which results in crack healing. However, only small cracks can be healed in this way. Therefore, we want to improve the self-healing efficiency by adapting the concrete matrix. By introducing high amounts of fibers several small cracks appear instead of one large crack. Combination with superabsorbent polymers, also called hydrogels, provides immediate crack sealing. Another methodology is to embed encapsulated polymeric agents in the matrix. When cracks appear, the capsules break and the agent is released. Upon contact of both components, they react and the crack is healed. This technique is also combined with CaCO3 precipitation of bacteria. In that case, not only polymers but also bacteria and nutrients are encapsulated and released upon cracking. First the polymer reacts, later the bacteria start to convert the nutrients into CaCO3 crystals which make the polymer structure denser and thus seal the cracks completely. As crack healing by means of bacteria uses a repair material which is more compatible with concrete we also try to seal cracks by only using bacterial CaCO3. Therefore, bacteria are embedded inside aggregates. Upon cracking, bacteria are exposed to the air and when water enters the crack bacteria become active and fill the crack with CaCO3. From the first results it was noticed that due to autonomous crack healing, water permeability is reduced and regain in mechanical properties is obtained. This means that more durable concrete structures may be obtained by using the proposed self-healing techniques.

Keywords

compositeadditiveschemical composition
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1488: Symposium 7B – Concrete with Smart Additives and Supplementary Cementitious Materials , 2012 , imrc12-1488-7b-003
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Edvardsen, C., ACI Materials Journal 96 (4), 448–454 (1999).Google Scholar
Yang, E.-H., The University of Michigan, 2008.Google Scholar
Li, V. C., in Concrete construction Engineering Handbook, edited by Nawy, E. (2008).Google Scholar
Jensen, O. M. and Hansen, P. F., Cement and Concrete Research 31(4), 647–654 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, O. M. and Hansen, P. F., Cement and Concrete Research 32 (6), 973–978 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüdern, A. E. and Mechtherine, V., in International RILEM Conference on Use of Superabsorbent Polymers and Other New Additives in Concrete (Lyngby, Denmark, 2010).Google Scholar
Kim, J. S. and Schlangen, E., in 2nd International Symposium on Service Life Design for Infrastructure (Delft, The Netherlands, 2010).Google Scholar
Snoeck, D., Ghent Univeristy, 2011.Google Scholar
Aldea, C., Shah, S. and Karr, A., Materials in Cicil Engineering 11 (3), 181–187 (1999).Google Scholar
Van Tittelboom, K., De Belie, N., Van Loo, D. and Jacobs, P., Cement and Concrete Composites 33 (4), 497–505 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukamoto, M. and Woener, J. D., Darmstadt Concrete 6, 123–135 (1991).Google Scholar
Li, V. C., Lim, Y. M. and Chan, Y.-W., Composites Part B: Engineering 29 (6), 819–827 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, C., in Smart Materials Conference, edited by Wilson, A. R., Asanuma, H. (2001), Vol. 4234, pp. 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, C., Jefferson, A. D. and Canoni, M. B., in 1st International Conference on Self Healing Materials, edited by Van der Zwaag, S. (Noordwijk aan Zee, The Netherlands, 2007), pp. 53.Google Scholar
Tran Diep, P. T., Tay, J. S. J., Quek, S. T. and Pang, S. D., The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering 2 (2), 116–125 (2009).Google Scholar
Mihashi, H., Kaneko, Y., Nishiwaki, T. and Otsuka, K., Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute 22, 441–450 (2000).Google Scholar
Van Tittelboom, K., De Belie, N., Lehmann, F. and Grosse, C. U., Construction and Building Materials 28 (1), 333–341 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Van Tittelboom, K., De Belie, N. and Verstraete, W., Construction and Building Materials 26 (1), 532–540 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standaert, L., Ghent University, 2010.Google Scholar
Samonin, V. V. and Elikova, E. E., Microbiology 73 (6), 696–701 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., De Belie, N. and Verstraete, W., Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 39 (4), 567–577 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar