Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:09:19.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thin-Film Indium Oxide Doped with Refractory Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Yuki Yoshida
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO 80401, USA
Chollada Warmsingh
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO 80401, USA
Timothy A. Gessert
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden CO 80401, USA
John D. Perkins
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden CO 80401, USA
David S. Ginley
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden CO 80401, USA
Timothy J. Coutts
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden CO 80401, USA
Get access

Abstract

The electrical and structural properties of sputtered indium oxide (In2O3) thin films doped with Mo, Zr, and Ti were studied. Properties of these films are compared to undoped In2O3 and tin-doped In2O3 (ITO). The as-sputtered films, doped with Mo (IO:Mo), exhibited high mobility (45 cm2V-1s-1). Pulsed laser deposition (PLD) was also used to deposit IO:Mo films. The highest mobility achieved for an as-deposited PLD IO:Mo film deposited onto a glass substrate was 42.7 cm2V-1s-1. However, PLD IO:Mo films deposited on single-crystal yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) substrates exhibited a higher mobility of 53.6 cm2V-1s-1 and a greater degree of structural orientation than the sputtered films. Following post-deposition annealing, both the sputtered films on glass, and the PLD films on YSZ, exhibited improved mobilities of 47 and 66 cm2V-1s-1, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lewis, B. G. and Paine, D. C., MRS Bulletin 25, 22 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Hamberg, I. and Granqvist, C. G., J. Appl. Phys. 60, R123 (1986).Google Scholar
3 Frank, G., Kauer, E., and Köstlin, H., Solar Energy Materials 8, 387 (1983).Google Scholar
4 Gordon, R. G., MRS Bulletin 25, 52 (2000).Google Scholar
5 Coutts, T. J., Young, D. L., and Li, X., MRS Bulletin 25, 58 (2000).Google Scholar
6 Nanto, H., Minami, T., Orito, S., and Takata, S., S., , Appl. Phys. 63, 2711 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Hoshi, Y. and Ohki, R., Electrochem. Acta 44, 3927 (1999).Google Scholar
8 Haacke, G., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 7, 73 (1977).Google Scholar
9 Meng, Y., Yang, X., Chen, H., Shen, J., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Z., and Hua, Z., Thin Solid Films 394, 219 (2001).Google Scholar
10 Meng, Y., Yang, X., Chen, H., Shen, J., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Z., and Hua, Z., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20, 288 (2002).Google Scholar
11 Our measurements have shown that the samples of ITO deposited on 7059 glass produced by Applied Films Corp, (Longmont, CO) show a mobility and carrier concentration of 47 cm2V-1s-1 and 7×1020 cm-3, respectively.Google Scholar
12 Nomura, K., Ujihira, Y., Tanaka, S., and Matsumoto, K., Hyperfine Interactions 42, 1207 (1988).Google Scholar
13 Yamada, N., Yasui, I., Shigesato, Y., Li, H., Ujihira, Y., and Nomura, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 2850 (1999).Google Scholar
14 Frank, G. and Köstlin, H., Appl. Phys. A 27, 197 (1982).Google Scholar
15 Fan, J. C. C. and Goodenough, J. B., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 3524 (1977).Google Scholar
16 Yoshida, Y., Gessert, T., Perkins, C., and Coutts, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (2002) in press.Google Scholar