Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T23:55:43.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Construction and Characterization of Galois Algebras with Given Galois Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Tadasi Nakayama*
Affiliation:
Nagoya University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recently H. Hasse has given an interesting theory of Galois algebras, which generalizes the well known theory of Kummer fields; an algebra over a field Ω is called a Galois algebra with Galois group G when possesses G as a group of automorphisms and is (G, Ω)-operator-isomorphic to the group ring G(Ω) of G over Ω. On assuming that the characteristic of Ω does not divide the order of G and that absolutely irreducible representations of G lie in Ω, Hasse constructs certain Ω-basis of , called factor basis, in accord with Wedderburn decomposition of the group ring and shows that a characterization of is given by a certain matrix factor system which defines the multiplication between different parts of the factor basis belonging to different characters of G. Now the present work is to free the theory from the restriction on the characteristic. We can indeed embrace the case of non-semisimple modular group ring G(Ω).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1950

References

[1] Brauer, R., Hypercomplex arithmetic and a theorem of Speiser, Com. Mat. Helvetici (1945).Google Scholar
[2] Hasse, H., Invariante Kennzeichnung Galoisscher Körper mit vorgegebener Galoisgruppe, forthcoming in Crelles Journal.Google Scholar
[3] Nakayama, T., Some studies on regular representations, induced representations and modular representations, Ann. Math. 39 (1938).Google Scholar
[4] Nesbitt, C.-Thrall, R., Some ring theorems with applications to modular representations, Ann. Math. 47 (1946).Google Scholar
[5] Osima, M., Note on the Kronecker product of representations of a group, Proc. Acad. Japan 17 (1941).Google Scholar