Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:11:55.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representations of Chevalley Groups in Characteristic p

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

W.J. Wong
W.J. Wong*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

If GK is a Chevalley group over a field K of prime characteristic p, the irreducible representations of GK over K form a natural object of study. The basic results have been obtained by Steinberg [15], who showed that, if K is perfect, then each irreducible rational representation of GK over K is a tensor product of representations obtained from certain basic representations by composing them with field automorphisms. These basic representations were obtained by “integrating” the irreducible restricted representations of a restricted Lie algebra associated with the group, which had been studied earlier by Curtis [7]. The present author had obtained the main results previously for the groups SL(n, K), Sp(2n, K) by different means, involving reduction (mod p) from the characteristic 0 case [16]. In this paper we extend this method to the other types of groups, in the hope that some additional insight may be gained.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 45 , February 1972 , pp. 39 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1972

References

[1] Brauer, R., Uber Systeme hyperkomplexer Zahlen, Math. Zeit. 30 (1929), 79–107.Google Scholar
[2] Brauer, R., Investigations on group characters, Ann. of Math. 42 (1941), 936–958.Google Scholar
[3] Brauer, R. and Nesbitt, C., On the modular characters of groups, Ann. of Math. 42 (1941), 556–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Brauer, R. and Noether, E., Über minimale Zerfällungskõrper irreduzibler Darstellungen, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. (1927), 221–228.Google Scholar
[5] Cartan, E., Oeuvres complètes, Part 1, vol. 1 (Paris, 1952).Google Scholar
[6] Chevalley, C., Sur certains groupes simples, Tôhoku Math. J. (2) 7 (1955), 14–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Curtis, C.W., Representations of Lie algebras of classical type with applications to linear groups, J. Math, and Mech. 9 (1960), 307–326.Google Scholar
[8] Jacobson, N., Lie Algebras (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
[9] Kostant, B., Groups over Z, Proc. Symposia in Pure Math. vol. 9, 90–98 (Providence, 1966).Google Scholar
[10] Mark, C., The irreducible modular representations of the group GL (3, p), Thesis, Univ. of Toronto (1938).Google Scholar
[11] Ree, R., Construction of certain semi-simple groups, Canad. J. Math. 16 (1964), 490–508.Google Scholar
[12] Ree, R. Séminaire “Sophus Lie”, exp. 19 (Paris, 1955).Google Scholar
[13] Springer, T.A., Weyl’s character formula for algebraic groups, Inventiones Math. 5 (1968), 85–105.Google Scholar
[14] Steinberg, R., Prime power representations of finite linear groups II, Canad. J. Math. 9 (1957), 347–351.Google Scholar
[15] Steinberg, R., Representations of algebraic groups, Nagoya Math. J. 22 (1963), 33–56.Google Scholar
[16] Wong, W.J., On the irreducible modular representations of finite classical groups, Thesis, Harvard Univ. (1959).Google Scholar