Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:23:02.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is a Less Pro-Cyclical Financial System an Achievable Goal?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Charles Goodhart
Charles Goodhart*
Affiliation:
Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics
*
E-mail: caegoodhart@aol.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Banking and finance are inherently pro-cyclical, a condition exacerbated by a combination of Basel II and mark-to-market accounting. But these latter measures have many advantages, so the need is to devise other counter-cyclical macro-prudential policies. This fragility was further enhanced by a decline in bank liquidity (reliance on wholesale funding) and a shift in govenance from partnerships to limited liability public companies. Some commentators have seen the solution to such pro-cyclicality in the guise of direct constraints on bank activity, such as the promotion of ‘narrow banking’ or limits on bank size. While there are arguments for toughening regulation as systemic risk increases, direct constraints are simplistic; more sensible ideas involve the adoption of better designed macro-prudential regulation, perhaps with some version of banking self-insurance. Quite what the future holds for bank regulation remains, however, to be decided.

Keywords

Pro-cyclicalitybank regulationBasel IImark-to-marketcapital adequacyliquidityloan-to-value ratiosbankers' remunerationG18G21G28
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 211 , January 2010 , pp. R17 - R26
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, V.V. (2009), ‘A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation’, Journal of Financial Stability, 5, 3, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, V. and Richardson, M. (eds) (2009), Restoring Financial Stability: How to Repair a Failed System, New York University Stern School of Business.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrian, T. and Brunnermeier, M.K. (2008), ‘CoVaR’, working paper, Princeton University and Federal Reserve Bank of New York, http://www.princeton.edu/~markus/research/papers/CoVaR.Google Scholar
Bagehot, W. (1873/1999), Lombard Street, originally published in 1873, New York, Scribner, Amstrong, republished in 1999, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brunnermeier, M.K., Crockett, A., Goodhart, C.A.E., Persaud, A. and Shin, H.S. (2009), The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation, Geneva Reports on the World Economy, 11, Geneva, International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies, ICMB, and Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C.A.E. (2008), ‘The boundary problem in financial regulation’, National Institute Economic Review, 206, October, pp. 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, C.A.E. and Lim, W.B. (2010), ‘Interest rate forecasts: a pathology’, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Halloran, M.J. (2009), ‘Systemic risks and the Bear Stearns crisis’, Chapter 10 in Ciorciari, J.D. and Taylor, J.B. (eds), The Road Ahead for the Fed, Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hart, O. and Zingales, L. (2009), ‘A new capital regulation for large financial institutions’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7298.Google Scholar
Kashyap, A.K., Rajan, R.G., and Stein, J.C. (2008), ‘Rethinking capital regulation’, Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium, ‘Maintaining Stability in a Changing Financial System’, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, 21-23 August.Google Scholar
Leamer, E. (2007), ‘Housing IS the business cycle’, Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium, ‘Housing, Housing Finance, and Monetary Policy’, held in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, 30 August – 1 September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1977), ‘A theory of systemic fragility’, in Altman, E.I. and Sametz, A.W. (eds), Financial Crises, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1982), ‘Can “It” happen again?’, Essays on Instability and Finance, M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
Segoviano, M. and Goodhart, C. (2009), ‘Banking stability measures’, IMF Working Paper 09/04, Washington, International Monetary Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlig, H. (2009), ‘A model of a systemic bank run’, NBER Working Paper No. 15072, June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. (2007), ‘Diversification at financial institutions and systemic crises’, University of Tilburg Discussion Paper No. 71, and forthcoming in Journal of Financial Intermediation.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. (2008), ‘The homogenization of the financial system and financial frises’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 3, pp 330–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar