Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T14:16:13.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Trade-Offs in the NIESR Model: Exercises Using Optimal Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Simon Brooks ,
Brian Henry  and
Elias Karakitsos
Simon Brooks
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
Brian Henry
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
Elias Karakitsos
Affiliation:
Department of Computing and Control, Imperial College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article investigates the consequences of alternative fiscal packages by applying optimal control techniques to the National Institute econometric model. Britton (1983) provides an assessment of alternative packages by using ready reckoners derived from simulations of the NIESR model reported in Brooks and Henry (1983). The present investigation may be seen as a more systematic analysis, using the techniques of optimal control. Such an assessment inevitably concerns the measurement of trade-offs between the major objectives of government policy, an issue which has generated much controversy over the last decade. Early interpretations of the Phillips Curve for example tended to regard the empirical finding of an inverse relation between inflation and unemployment as providing a menu for policy choice. According to this interpretation, aggregate demand policy could be used to select the best combination of inflation and unemployment rates available subject to the constraint set by the Phillips Curve. Since that time, parallel developments in the theory of wage inflation, expectations formation, and macroeconomic policy have produced considerable scepticism about the existence of this trade-off, questioning whether the implied choice between alternative combinations of inflation and unemployment is open to governments using aggregate demand policy. Much of this scepticism was coincident with growing dissatisfaction with the Phillips Curve as a statistical representation of wage inflation, but we will not be directly concerned with this aspect of the argument here. Two points however do arise from this debate which are of direct relevance to the subject matter of this article. The first is that a trade-off between inflation and unemployment may exist even if the labour market is not characterised by a Phillips Curve. The second is the central role played by natural rate concepts in the debate on the effectiveness of aggregate demand policy.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 105 , August 1983 , pp. 36 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank Dr Sanjay Dabysing of Imperial College for his help in computing the optimal control runs reported here. The exercises reported here use the optimisation techniques developed by the PROPE group at Imperial College.

References

Artis, M. and Karakitsos, E. (1983), ‘Intermediate target variables : their role in policy formation with special reference to the money supply and the exchange rate’, Appendix 10. International Monetary Arrangements. Fourth Report of the Treasury and Civil Service Committee Session 1982-83, volume III.Google Scholar
Begg, D.K.H. (1982), ‘The Rational Expectations Revolution in Macroeconomics’, Phillip Allan, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, J. (1982), ‘Production, Purposes and Structure’, Francis Pinter.Google Scholar
Britton, A.J. (1983), ‘Economic Policy and Prospects’ in ’The Economy and the 1983 Budget’ ed. John Kay, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brooks, S. and Henry, S.G.B., ‘Re-estimation of the National Inatitute model’, Natiortal Institute Economic Review, no. 103, pp. 62–70, February 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buiter, W. and Miller, M. (1981), ‘The Thatcher Experiment: An Interim Report’, Discussion Paper no. 106, Centre for Labour Economics, LSE. (Talks forthcoming in Brooking Papers).Google Scholar
Chow, G. (1981), ‘Econometric Analysis by Control Methods’, Wiley.Google Scholar
Corden, W.M. (1981), ‘Taxation, real wage rigidity and employment’, Economic Journal no. 91.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1968), ‘The role of monetary policy’, American Economic Review.Google Scholar
Henry, S.G.B., Karakitsos, E. and Savage, D. (1982), ‘On the derivation of the “efficient” Phillips Curve’, Manchester School, June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niesr (1979), Listing of Interim Model IV.Google Scholar
Niesr (1983), National Institute Model VI.Google Scholar
Sargent, T. and Wallace, N. (1975), ‘Rational expectations, the optimal monetary instrument and the optimal money supply rule’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, no.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, R.J. (1978), ‘Rational expectations and the dynamic structure of macroeconomic models: a critical review’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 4, no. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar