Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:37:09.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of EU Growth Trends, with a Particular Focus on Germany, France, Italy and the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Kieran McMorrow  and
Werner Roger
Kieran McMorrow*
Affiliation:
European Commission, DG ECFIN
Werner Roger
Affiliation:
European Commission, DG ECFIN
*
e-mail: Werner.Roeger@ec.europa.eu or Kieran.Mcmorrow@ec.europa.eu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s the growth performance of the Euro Area as a whole, despite some good individual country performances, has failed to keep pace with developments elsewhere in the EU (including the UK) and also in the US. This is especially the case for a number of the larger Euro Area economies. Despite an encouraging performance in terms of its labour input trends, there has been a significant, offsetting, deterioration in the Euro Area's underlying productivity performance. This is driven in large part, worryingly, by a marked downward shift in the growth rate of total factor productivity. Looking to the future, no significant recovery is predicted in the Euro Area's underlying economic performance over the period 2007–11. While the policy challenge is a serious one, the Euro Area as a whole can take comfort from the fact that the gains from a successful refocusing of its overall reform agenda could be considerable. For example, the progressive introduction of the five key measures linked to the Lisbon strategy (i.e. the services directive; reduction of the administrative burden; improving human capital; 3 per cent R&D target; and increases in the employment rate) could boost the Euro Area's economic and employment growth rates by more than ½ a percentage point annually for more than a decade. Such an outturn would give the Euro Area a potential growth rate of around 2½ per cent, a rate of growth which in per capita terms would be broadly comparable to that of the US over the 2007–15 time period and, on the basis of current trends and policies, slightly better than that of the UK.

Keywords

GDP growthProductivityEmploymentStructural reformD24J11J21O47
Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 199 , 01 January 2007 , pp. 82 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank Cécile Denis and Karel Havik for valuable suggestions regarding earlier drafts of this paper. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.

References

Ahmad, N., Lequiller, F., Marianna, P., Pilat, D., Schreyer, P. and Wölfl, A. (2004), ‘Comparing labour productivity growth in the OECD area: the role of measurement’, Paper presented at the Banque de France, CEPII and IFO Workshop, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. (2004), ‘The economic future of Europe’, NBER Working Paper 10310.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. J. and Katz, L. F. (1999), ‘Wage dynamics: reconciling theory and evidence’, American Economic Review, 89, pp. 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, C., Mc Morrow, K. and Roeger, W. (2004), ‘An analysis of EU and US productivity developments’, DG ECFIN Economic Papers, No 208.Google Scholar
Denis, C., Mc Morrow, K. and Roeger, W. (2005), ‘The Lisbon Strategy and the EU's structural productivity problem’, DG ECFIN Economic Papers, No 221.Google Scholar
Denis, C., Grenouilleau, D., Mc Morrow, K. and Roeger, W. (2006), ‘Calculating potential growth rates and output gaps – a revised production function approach’, DG ECFIN Economic Papers, No 247.Google Scholar
Gali, J. (1999), ‘Technology, employment and the business cycle: do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations?’, American Economic Review, 89, pp. 249–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planas, C., Roeger, W. and Rossi, A. (2007), ‘How much has labour taxation contributed to European structural unemployment?’ Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Sapir, A.et al. (2003), ‘An agenda for a growing Europe: making the EU system deliver’, Report of an Independent High Level Group established on the initiative of the President of the European Commission.Google Scholar
Triplett, J. and Bosworth, B. (2000), ‘Productivity in the services sector’, in Stern, R.M. (ed.), Services in the International Economy, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Van Ark, B., Inklaar, R. and McGuckian, R. (2003), ‘Changing gear: productivity, ICT and service industries in Europe and the US’, in Christensen, J. and Maskell, P. (eds), The Industrial Dynamics of the New Digital Economy, Edward Elgar, pp. 56–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar