Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:47:53.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperial diversity in the village: petitions for and against the division of Galicia in 1848

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jana Osterkamp
Jana Osterkamp*
Affiliation:
Collegium Carolinum, Munich, Germany
*
∗Email: jana.osterkamp@lmu.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Galicia in 1848, petitions as to whether the province should be divided in two with a Polish and a Ruthenian region moved thousands of people to action. Although the petitions were among the largest in the history of the Habsburg monarchy, the petition lists have never been researched in detail. Whereas the initiators of the petition for the partition were anxious to present a narrative of national and confessional unity for a “Ruthenian” Eastern Galicia suppressed by “Poles,” the counter-petitionists disputed the very existence of a Ruthenian nationality and chose a narrative of peaceful, conflict-free living together. A close reading of the petition lists reveals both conflict and co-existence. The lists with a checkered contrast of Cyrillic, Latin, and Hebrew scripts bear witness to what was a multi-ethnic and multi-confessional society. More than that, these sources prove impressively that the three large religious and ethnic communities – Poles, Ruthenians, and Jews – were in continuous day-to-day contact with each other. While the history of emerging nationalism has so far been in the foreground in historiography of the revolutionary events in Galicia in 1848, the petitions' sources tell another story of everyday social interaction and of practices of social ambiguity in the Galician village and market communities.

Keywords

Galicia1848Ruthenian and Polish petition campaignpeasantrynationalismreligionJewrypractices of ambiguity
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 44 , Issue 5 , September 2016 , pp. 731 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This paper was translated by Jaime Hyland.

References

von Bach, Alexander Nachlass. n.d. In: Österreichisches Staatsarchiv [Austrian State Archive] Allgemeines Verwaltungsarchiv [General Archive of the Administration] (ÖStA AVA) K. 14 Galizien u.a. Umschlag 33.4 Ruthenen und Galizien, n.d., without folio number.Google Scholar
Bartal, Israel. 2010. Geschichte der Juden im östlichen Europa, 1772-1881 [History of the Jews of Eastern Europe, 1772-1881]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Bohachevska-Chomjak, Marta. 1967. The Spring of a Nation: The Ukrainians in Eastern Galicia in 1848. Philadelphia, PA: Shevchenko Scientific Society.Google Scholar
Bonusiak, Andrzej, and Stolarczyk, Marian, eds. 1999. Galicja w 1848 roku. Demografia, dzialalność polityczna i spoleczna, gospodarka i kultura [Galicia in 1848. Demography, Political and Social Activity, Economy and Culture]. Rzeszów: Galicja i jej dziedzictwo 12.Google Scholar
Botushans'kyj, Vasyl M. 2000. “Die Ukrainer und der Prager Slavenkongress [The Ukrainians and the Prague Slavic Congress.].” In Der Prager Slavenkongress 1848, edited by Moritsch, Andreas, 115–122. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Brandt, Harm-Hinrich, ed. 2014. Der österreichische Neoabsolutismus als Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsproblem: Diskussionen iiber einen strittigen Epochenbegriff [Austrian Neo-absolutism as a Constitutional and Administrative Problem: Discussions on a Controversial Term for an Epoch]. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2002. “Ethnicity Without Groups.” European Journal of Sociology 43 (4): 163–189.Google Scholar
Cetnarowicz, Antoni. 2000. “Die Polen und der Prager Slavenkongress [The Poles and the Prague Slavic Congress.].” In Der Prager Slavenkongress 1848, edited by Moritsch, Andreas, 103–114. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Dąbczański, Antoni. 1848. Die ruthenische Frage in Galizien [The Ruthenian Question in Galicia]. Lemberg: Ossolinskische National-Instituts-Druckerei.Google Scholar
Denkschrift der ruthenischen Nation in Galizien zur Aufklärung ihrer Verhältnisse [Memorandum of the Ruthenian Nation in Galicia to Clarify its Circumstances], by the Supreme Ruthenian Council, Lemberg, 31/07/1848, in: Österreichisches Staatsarchiv [Austrian State Archive], Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv (ÖStA HHStA) Landerangelegenheiten [Regional Affairs] (LA) Österreichischer Reichsrat 1848/49 [Austrian Imperial Council 1848/49] (ÖRT) K. 130 Petitionen gegen die Teilung Galiziens, fol. 362.Google Scholar
Falkowska, Joanna. 2013. Myśl wychowania narodowego w Galicji okresu autonoma. Twórcy i idee [The Idea of National Education in Galicia During the Autonomous Period. Founders and Ideas]. Toruń: Marszałek.Google Scholar
Fras, Zbigniew. 1991. Florian Ziemiałkowski, 1817-1900. Biografia polityczna [A Political Biography]. Wroclaw: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Friedman, Filip. 1929. Die galizischen Juden im Kampfe um ihre Gleichberechtigung 1848-1868 [Galician Jewry and the Struggle for Equal Rights 1848-1868]. Frankfurt a.M.: Kauffmann.Google Scholar
Grill, Tobias. 2013. Der Westen im Osten: Deutsches Judentum und jüdische Bildungsreform in Osteuropa, 1783-1939 [The West in the East: German Jewry and Jewish Education Reform in Eastern Europe, 1783-1939]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Haumann, Heiko. 2004. “Juden in der ländlichen Gesellschaft Galiziens am Ende des 19. und zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts.” [Jews in Galicia's Rural Society at the End of the 19th and Beginning of the 20th Century.] In Deutsche, Juden, Polen: Geschichte einer wechselvollen Beziehung im 20. Jahrhundert [Germans, Jews, Poles: History of a Changeable Relationship in the 20th Century], edited by Andrea Löw, Kerstin Robusch, and Stefanie Walter, 35-58. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Himka, John-Paul. 1984. “The Greek Catholic Church and Nation-Building in Galicia, 1772-1918.” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 8: 426–452.Google Scholar
Hoerhan, Otto. 1966. “Die Petitionen an den Kremsierer Reichstag 1848/49 [The Petitions to the Kremsier Parliament 1848/49].” PhD diss., University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Hostička, Vladimír. 2000. “Slovanský sjezd a ukrajinci [The Slavic Congress and the Ukrainians].” In 150 let Slovanského sjezdu 1848 [150th Anniversary of the Slavic Congress in 1848], edited by Václav Veber, 63-71. Prague: Národní Knihovna.Google Scholar
Jepsen, Harald H. 2005. “Orthodoxy and Autocephaly in Galicia.” In Galicia a Multicultured Land, edited by Hann, Christopher M. and Magocsi, Paul R., 71–81. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kozik, Jan. 1986. The Ukrainian National Movement in Galicia, 1815-1848. Edmonton: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Krevecz'ky'j, Ivan. 1910. “Sprava podyilu Halychyny w rr. 1846-1850 [The Matter of the Partition of Galicia in 1846-1850].” Zapysky Naukovoho Tovarystva Imeni Sevchenka 93: 54-69; 94: 58–83; 95: 54–115; 96: 105–154.Google Scholar
Lane, Hugo. 1998. “Class Interest and the Shaping of a ‘Non-historical’ Nation: Reassessing the Galician Ruthenian Path to Ukrainian Identity.” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 22: 373–391.Google Scholar
Magocsi, Paul R. 2002. The Roots of Ukrainian Nationalism: Galicia as Ukraine's Piedmont. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Maner, Hans-Christian. 2005. Grenzregionen der Habsburgermonarchie im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert: Ihre Bedeutung und Funktion aus der Perspektive Wiens [Borderlands of the Habsburg Monarchy in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Their Importance and Function from the Viennese Perspective]. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
von Mises, Ludwig. 1902. Das gutsherrlich-bauerliche Verhaltnis in Galizien, 1772-1848 [The Relation Between Landlords and Peasants in Galicia, 1772-1848]. Vienna: Deuticke.Google Scholar
Mudry'j, Mar'ian. [2006] 2007. “Rusy'ny’ pol's'koyi naciyi” (gente Rutheni, natione Poloni) v “Galy'chy'ni XIX st. i ponyattya, vitchy'zny [Ruthenians of Polish Nationality (gente Rutheni, natione Poloni) in 19th Century Galicia and the Understanding of Homeland].” In Confraternitas. Yuvilejny'j zbirny'k na poshanu Yaroslava Isayevy'cha, edited by Kry'kun, M., 461–474. L'viv: Nacional'na Akad. Nauk Ukraïny.Google Scholar
Mudry'i, Mar'ian. 2008. “Rus'ky'j Sobor 1848 roku: organizaciya ta chleny [Ruthenian Council in 1848: Organisation and Members].” In Yuvilejny'j zbirny'k na poshanu Ivana Patera, edited by Isayevych, Yaroslav, 107–126. L'viv: Nacional'na Akad. Nauk Ukraïny.Google Scholar
ÖStA HHStA ÖRT (Österreichisches Staatsarchiv [Austrian State Archive], Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv (ÖStA HHStA) Länderangelegenheiten [Regional Affairs] (LA) Österreichischer Reichsrat (ÖRT)). 1848-1849. K. 130, 131, 132. Petitionen gegen die Teilung Galiziens [Petitions against the partition of Galicia].Google Scholar
Pacholkiv, Svjatoslav. 2002. Emanzipation durch Bildung. Entwicklung und gesellschaftliche Rolle der ukrainischen Intelligenz im habsburgischen Galizien, 1890-1914 [Emancipation Through Education. The Development and Social Role of the Ukrainian Intelligentsia in Habsburg Galicia, 1890-1914]. Vienna: Verl. für Geschichte und Politik.Google Scholar
Pillersdorf to the Ruthenian Council at Lemberg, Z. 1717 M. I., Vienna, 09/05/1848. In Österreichisches Staatsarchiv [Austrian State Archive], Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv (ÖStA HHStA) Landerangelegenheiten [Regional Affairs] (LA) Österreichischer Reichsrat 1848/49 [Austrian Imperial Council 1848/49] (ÖRT) K. 130 Petitionen gegen die Teilung Galiziens, fol. 379.Google Scholar
Polnische Revolutionen. Erinnerungen aus Galizien [Polish Revolutions. Memories from Galicia]. 1863. Prague: Credner.Google Scholar
Polonsky, Antony. 1998. “The Revolutionary Crisis of 1846-1849 and Its Place in the Development of 19th-century Galicia.” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 22: 443–469.Google Scholar
Roth, Joseph. 2015. Reisen in die Ukraine und nach Russland [Journeys to Ukraine and Russia]. Edited by Bürger, Jan. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Rudnytsky, Ivan L. 1982. “The Ukrainians in Galicia under Austrian Rule.” In Nationbuilding and the Politics of Nationalism: Essays on Austrian Galicia, edited by Markovits, Andrei S. and Sysyn, Frank E., 23–67. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rudnytsky, Ivan L. 2001. “Ukrainische Nation und zwei Konfessionen: Der Klerus und die ukrainische Frage 1861-1921 [Ukrainian Nation and Two Confessions: The Clergy and the Ukrainian Question, 1861-1921].” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 49: 240–256.Google Scholar
Schlitter, Hanns. 1920. Aus Österreichs Vormärz: Galizien und Krakau [Out of the Austrian Vormärz Period: Galicia and Krakow]. Vienna: Amalthea.Google Scholar
Seiderer, Georg. 2015. Österreichs Neugestaltung: Verfassungspolitik und Verwaltungsreform im österreichischen Neoabsolutismus unter Alexander Bach, 1849-1859 [The Reorganization of Austria: Constitutional Politics and Administrative Reform in Austrian Neo-absolutism under Alexander Bach, 1849-1859]. Vienna: Verl. d. Österreich. Akad. d. Wiss.Google Scholar
Śliz, Małgorzata. 2006. Galicyjscy Żydzi na drodze do równouprawnienia, 1848-1914: Aspekt prawny procesu emancypacji Żydów w Galicji [The Galician Jews on Their Path to Legal Equality 1849-1914: The Legal Aspect of the Emancipation Process of Jews in Galicia]. Krakow: Księgarnia Akademicka.Google Scholar
Smołka, Stanislaw. 1916. Die reussische Welt: Historisch-politische Studien [The Ruthenian World. Historical-Political Studies]. Vienna: Oberstes Polnisches Nationalkomitee.Google Scholar
Springer, Anton. 1885. Protokolle des Verfassungs-Ausschusses im Oesterreichischen Reichstage 1848-1849 [Proceedings of Austrian Reichsrat's Constitutional Committee 1848-1849]. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Stanislawski, Michael. 2007. A Murder in Lemberg: Politics, Religion, and Violence in Modern Jewish History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stauter-Halsted, Keely. 2001. The Nation in the Village: The Genesis of Peasant National Identity in Austrian Poland, 1848-1914. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stepien, Stanislaw. 2005. “Borderland City: Przemysl and the Ruthenian National Awakening in Galicia.” In Galicia a Multicultured land, edited by Hann, Christopher M. and Magocsi, Paul R., 52–70. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Stolarczyk, Marian, ed. 1994. Działalność Lwowskiej Centralnej Rady Narodowej w śiwetle źródeł polskich [The Activity of the Lwow Central Rada Narodowa in the Light of Polish Sources]. Rzeszów: Wydawn, Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej.Google Scholar
Stourzh, Gerald. 1985. Die Gleichberechtigung der Nationalitäten in der Verfassung und Verwaltung Österreichs, 1848-1918 [Equal Rights of Nationalities in the Constitution and Administration of Austria, 1848-1918]. Vienna: Verl. d. Österreich. Akad. d. Wiss.Google Scholar
Struve, Kai. 2005. Bauern und Nation in Galizien: Über Zugehörigkeit und soziale Emanzipation im 19. Jahrhundert [Peasants and Nation in Galicia: On Belonging and Social Emancipation in the 19th Century]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Sundhaussen, Holm. 2014. Sarajevo. Die Geschichte einer Stadt [Sarajevo. A City's History]. Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Świątek, Adam. 2014. Gente Rutheni, natione Poloni. Z dziejów Rusinów narodowości polskiej w Galicji [From the History of Ruthenians with Polish Nationality in Galicia]. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.Google Scholar
Thon, Jakob. 1907. “Die Berufsgliederung der Juden in Galizien. [The Professional Classification of Jews in Galicia].” Zeitschrift für Demographie und Statistik der Juden 3: 113–120.Google Scholar
Turij, Oleh. 1994. ‘“Nacional'ne i polity'chne polononTstvo sered greko-katoly'cz'kogo duxovenstva Galy'chy'ny’ pid chas revolyuciyi 1848-1849 rokiv [The National and Political Polonophilism among Greek-Catholic Clergy in Galicia During the Revolutionary Times of 1848-1849].” Zapy'sky’ Naukovogo tovary'stva imeni Shevchenka. Praci Istory'ko-filosofs'-koyi sekciyi 23: 183–206.Google Scholar
Turij, Oleh. 1999. “'Ukrayins'ka ideya’ v Galy'chy'ni v seredy'ni XIX stolittya [The Ukrainian Idea in Galicia in the Middle of the 19th Century].” Ukrayina moderna 2-3: 59–75.Google Scholar
Turij, Oleh. 2002. “Ukrajinska ‘Vesna narod'iv’ [The Ukrainian ‘Spring of Nations'].” In Holovna Rus'ka Rada, 1848-1851. Protokoly zasidan’ i knyha korespondenciï, edited by Oleh Turij, ix-xxxii. L'viv: Instytut istoriji cerkvy.Google Scholar
Turij, Oleh, ed. 2003. “Eklezijal'na j nacional'na identynist’ greko-katolykiv central'no-schidnoji evropy [The Ecclesial and National Identity of the Greek Catholics of Central-Eastern Europe].” Kovcheh. A Scholarly Journal of Church History 4.Google Scholar
Waldenegg, Berger, and Christoph, Georg. 2005. ‘“Die Bukowina war glücklicher': Die administrative und staatsrechtliche Stellung der Ruthenen in Galizien von Anfang 1848 bis Herbst 1850 [“Bukovina Was Happier”: The Administrative and Constitutional Position of Ruthenians in Galicia from the Beginning of 1848 to the Fall of 1850.].” In Staletí objevů, diplomacie a válek [Centuries of Discoveries, Diplomacy, and Wars], edited by Frantisek Stellner and Martin Kovář, 23-46. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Wendland, Anna Veronika. 2001. Die Russophilen in Galizien: Ukrainische Konservative zwischen Österreich und Rußland, 1848-1915 [The Russophiles in Galicia: Ukrainian Conservatives Between Austria and Russia, 1848-1915]. Vienna: Verlag d. ÖAW.Google Scholar
Wica, Władysława, ed. 1999. Rok 1848: Wiosna Ludów w Galicji. Zbiór studiów [The Year 1848: Spring of Nations in Galicia. Collected Studies]. Kraków: Wydawn. Naukowe AP.Google Scholar