Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:24:21.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turning Outwards or Turning Inwards? The Russian Orthodox Church Challenged by Fundamentalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Philip Walters
Philip Walters*
Affiliation:
81 Thorney Leys, Witney, Oxon OX28 5BY, UK. Email: philip.walters@waltfam.freeserve.co.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The 1997 Russian law on religion recognizes Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism, and Buddhism as the “traditional religions” of Russia. These religions see themselves as having an important role to play in achieving social stability, and particularly in overcoming religious “extremism” and the perceived threat it poses to society. “Traditional'” religions stand shoulder to shoulder, explaining that the values they champion tend towards the creation and preservation of peace and reconciliation in society, and that, moreover, these are shared values, common to all “traditional'‘ religions. Indeed, the primary criterion for identifying a “traditional'” religion in Russia today may be that it is “noncompetitive” with other religions. The Moscow Patriarchate rejects the idea, for example, that Orthodox Christians should proselytize among Muslims. The fact that each religion sees itself as having possession of the “truth” does not endanger the cooperation, harmony and mutual respect among the traditional religions in Russia at the level of official and institutional interaction. Regarding the controversy over the school textbook, Foundations of Orthodox Culture, which human rights activists accused of constituting pro-Orthodox propaganda, an Orthodox priest and a Muslim chief mufti filed a joint claim against those who initiated the case, and a Protestant leader came out in support of the use of the textbook in the public schools.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , November 2007 , pp. 853 - 879
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agadjanian, Alexander. “Religion between Universal and Particular: Eastern Europe after 1989.” In Religious Fundamentalism in the Contemporary World, edited by Saha, Santosh C. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., Sivan, Emmanuel, and Scott Appleby, R. “Politics, Ethnicity and Fundamentalism.” In Fundamentalisms Comprehended, by Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bacon, Edwin. “The Church and Politics in Russia: A Case Study of the 1996 Presidential Election.” Religion, State & Society 25, no. 3 (1997): 253–25.Google Scholar
Basil, John. “Church–State Relations in Russia: Orthodoxy and Federation Law, 1990–2004.” Religion, State & Society 33, no. 2 (2005): 151–15.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. Postmodernity and its Discontents. New York: New York University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher. Postmodernism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Casanova, Jose. “Beyond European and American Exceptionalism: Towards a global Perspective.” In Predicting Religion: Christian, Secular and Alternative Futures, edited by Davie, Grace, Heelas, Paul and Woodhead, Linda. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Davie, Grace, Heelas, Paul, and Woodhead, Linda, eds. Predicting Religion: Christian, Secular and Alternative Futures. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. Fundamentalism, Sectarianism, and Revolution: The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
Fischer, L., ed. Church and State: Opening a New Ecumenical Discussion. Geneva, World Council of Churches, 1976.Google Scholar
Glanzer, Perry L. “Postcommunist Moral Education in Russia's State Schools: God, Country and Controversy.” Religion, State & Society 33, no. 3 (2005): 207–20.Google Scholar
Houtepen, Anton. “Ecumenism and Transnationalism.” In Orthodox Christianity and Contemporary Europe, edited by Sutton, Jonathan and van den Bercken, Wil. Leuven, Paris and Dudley, MA: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London: Touchstone, 1997.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. “Some Priority Variables in the Study of Comparative Religious Politics.” In Religious Fundamentalism in the Contemporary World, edited by Saha, Santosh C. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Lang, Graeme, and Wee, Vivienne. “Fundamentalist Ideology, Institutions, and the State: A Formal Analysis.” In Religious Fundamentalism in the Contemporary World, edited by Saha, Santosh C. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Lapidus, Ira M. History of Islamic Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E., and Scott Appleby, R. Fundamentalisms Observed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E. Fundamentalisms and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E. Fundamentalisms and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E. Accounting for Fundamentalisms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E. Fundamentalisms Comprehended. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Parel, Anthony J. “Introduction”. In Religious Fundamentalism in the Contemporary World, edited by Saha, Santosh C. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Payne, Daniel. “The Challenge of Western Globalization to Orthodox Christianity.” In Orthodox Christianity and Contemporary Europe, edited by Sutton, Jonathan and van den Bercken, Wil. Leuven, Paris and Dudley, MA: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Raquibuz Zaman, M. “Islamic Perspectives on Territorial Boundaries and Autonomy.” In Boundaries and Justice: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, edited by Miller, David and Hasmi, Sohail H. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland. “Globalization, Modernization, and Postmodernization: The Ambiguous Position of Religion.” In Religion and Global Order, edited by Robertson, Roland and Garrett, William. New York: Paragon House, 1991.Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland. “Globalisation or Glocalisation?” Journal of International Communication 1, no. 1 (1994): 33–52.Google Scholar
Rock, Stella. “Fraternal Strife: Nationalist Fundamentalists in the Contemporary Russian Orthodox Brotherhood Movement.” In Orthodox Christianity and Contemporary Europe, edited by Sutton, Jonathan and van den Bercken, Wil. Leuven, Paris and Dudley, MA: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Rotar', Igor'. “Under the Green Banner: Islamic Radicals in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.” [Translation of idem, Pod zelenym znamenem islama: islamskiye radikaly v Rossii i SNG. Moscow: AIRO-XX, 2001] Religion, State & Society 30, no. 2 (2002): 89–153.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Max J. “Fundamentalism's Challenge to Modern Society: Political as Well as Religious.” In Religion in a Changing Europe: Between Pluralism and Fundamentalism: Selected Problems, edited by Marczewska-Rytko, Maria. Lublin: Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sutton, Jonathan, and van den Bercken, Wil, eds. Orthodox Christianity and Contemporary Europe. Leuven, Paris and Dudley, MA: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Trofimchuk, N. A., and Svishchev, M. P. Ekspansiya. Moscow: Akademiya Gosudarstvennoi Sluzhby, 2000.Google Scholar
Tschannen, Oliver. “The Evolutionary Principle in the Study of Religion and Society.” In Predicting Religion: Christian, Secular and Alternative Futures, edited by Davie, Grace, Heelas, Paul and Woodhead, Linda. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander. “The Religious Factor in the Presidential Campaign and in the Formation of Ideology of the New Rule.” In National-Patriots, Church and Putin: Parliamentary and Presidential Campaigns 1999–2000, by Alexander Verkhovsky et al. Moscow: “Panorama” Center, 2001.Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander. “The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Nationalist, Xenophobic and Antiwestern Tendencies in Russia Today: Not Nationalism, but Fundamentalism.” Religion, State & Society 30, no. 4 (2002): 333–33.Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander. Politicheskoye pravoslaviye: Russkiye pravoslavnyye natsionalisty i fundamentalisty, 1995–2001 gg. Moscow: Informatisonno-analitichesky tsentr SOVA, 2003.Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander et al. National-Patriots, Church and Putin: Parliamentary and Presidential Campaigns 1999–2000. Moscow: “Panorama” Center, 2001.Google Scholar
Walters, Philip. “Notes on Autocephaly and Phyletism.” Religion, State & Society 30, no. 4 (2002): 357–35.Google Scholar
Walters, Philip. “The Orthodox Church Seeks to Place Itself in Russian Society.” In Burden or Blessing? Russian Orthodoxy and the Construction of Civil Society and Democracy, edited by Marsh, Christopher. Boston: Institute on Culture, Religion and World Affairs, University of Boston, 2004.Google Scholar
Walters, Philip. “What Happened to Sobornost? The Russian Orthodox Church Positions Itself in State and Society.” (unpublished paper).Google Scholar
Wills, Gary. Under God. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Yannaras, Christos. The Freedom of Morality. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1984.Google Scholar