Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T04:17:32.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governing the “Unmarked” Citizens: Romania’s Roma in the Grip of Socialist Technologies of Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Ionuț-Marian Anghel Open the ORCID record for Ionuț-Marian Anghel [Opens in a new window]
Ionuț-Marian Anghel*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for the Quality of Life, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania
*
Email: ionut.anghel@iccv.ro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While many scholarly contributions have documented the socialist state policies deployed toward the Roma from Central and Eastern Europe, less attention was paid to how discourses and policies have aimed to turn the “non-European,” “backward Roma” into reformed and modernized subjects that were supposed to conform to an “European,” sedentary way of life. Thus, I discuss proletarization and sedentarization not as state policies but as programs and technologies of power, specific to a socialist governmentality. The article interrogates the programs, technologies of power and biopolitical regulations that allowed the state authorities to legitimize their intervention in the daily lives of the Roma, with profound depoliticizing effects. I analyze political programs, governmental reports on Roma and ministry regulations as instruments of governmentality through which the governance of the “Roma question” took shape. Special attention is given to data/knowledge production. Finally, the research pinpoints that the micro-scale and the everyday workings of the socialist technologies of power might explain the different trajectories of socio-economic adaptation among Roma groups, which some studies have revealed during post-socialism.

Keywords

socialist governmentalityRomatechnologies of powersedentarizationproletarization
Type
Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 103 - 119
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achim, Viorel. 2004. The Roma in Romanian History. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Achim, Viorel. 2010. “Încercarea romilor din România de a obține statutul de naționalitate conlocuitoare (1948-1949) [The attempt of the Roma in Romania to obtain the status of cohabiting nationality (1948-1949)].” Revista istorică 21: 449–465.Google Scholar
Asséo, Henriette, Petcuţ, Petre, and Piasere, Leonardo. 2018. “Romania’s Roma. A Socio-Historical Overview.” In Open Borders, Unlocked Cultures. Romanian Roma Migrants in Western Europe, edited by Yaron Matras and Daniele Viktor Leggio, 26–56. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Băncescu, Irina, and Calciu, Daniela. 2014. “On Changes in the Dwelling Conditions of the Romanian Roma under Communism.” In Reading the Architecture of the Underprivileged Classes. A Perspective on the Protests and Upheavals in Our Cities, edited by Elleh, Nnamdi. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Barany, Zoltan. 2000. “Politics and the Roma in State-Socialist Eastern Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 33: 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barany, Zoltan. 2002. The East European Gypsies: Regime Change, Marginality and Ethnopolitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Andrew, Osborne, Thomas, and Rose, Nikolas, eds. 1996. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neoliberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Sam. 1984. “Ethnicity, Class and Public Policy: Tsigani/Gypsies in Socialist Romania.” In Papers of the V Congress of the Southeast European Studies, edited by Shangriladze, Hot and Townsend, Erica. Columbus and Ohio: Slavica Publishers for the US National Committee of AIESEE.Google Scholar
Boia, Lucian. 2015. Cum s-a românizat România [How Romania was Romanianized]. București: Humanitas.Google Scholar
Bussard, Robert. 1987. “The ‘Dangerous Class’ of Marx and Engels: The Rise of the Idea of the Lumpenproletariat.” History of European Ideas 8 (6): 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Chelcea, Ion. 1944. Țiganii din Romania. Monografie etnografică [Gypsies in Romania. An ethnographic monograph]. București: Editura Institutului Central de Statistică.Google Scholar
Clark, Colin. 2004. “‘Severity Has Often Enraged but Never Subdued a Gypsy’: The History and Making of European Romani Stereotypes.” In The Role of the Romanies Images and Counter-Images of ‘Gypsies’/Romanies in European Cultures, edited by Saul, Nicholas and Tebbutt, Susan, 226–246. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Ministers - State Undersecretary for National Minorities. 1951. Situaţia statistică a ţiganilor nomazi, seminomazi şi stabili din RPR [Statistical situation of nomadic, semi-nomadic and stable Gypsies from the RPR]. National Archives of Romania, Council of Ministers archive of the State Undersecretary for National Minorities, file 1929/1952, 19–21.Google Scholar
Council of Ministers - State Undersecretary for National Minorities. 1952a. Problema populaţiei ţigăneşti din RPR. Prezentarea schematică a problemei [The problem of the Gypsy population in the RPR. Schematic presentation of the problem]. National Archives of Romania, Council of Ministers archive of the State Undersecretary for National Minorities file 1929/1952, 29–45.Google Scholar
Council of Ministers - State Undersecretary for National Minorities. 1952b. Analiza privind situaţia numerică, economică şi socială a romilor nomazi, seminomazi şi sedentarizați din România la începutul anilor 1950 (1952). [Analysis of the numerical, economic and social situation of nomadic, semi-nomadic and sedentary Roma in Romania in the early 1950s (1952)]. National Archives of Romania, Council of Ministers archive of the State Undersecretary for National Minorities file 1929/1952, 70–101.Google Scholar
Council of Ministers - State Undersecretary for National Minorities. 1972. Raport privind situaţia social-economică a populaţiei de ţigani din ţara noastră [Report on the socio-economic situation of the Gypsy population in our country]. The National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archives, Documentary archive, file 144, vol. 15, 130–141.Google Scholar
Crowe, David. 1995. A History of the Gypsies of Eastern Europe and Russia. London and New York: lB.Tauris & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society. Los Angeles, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1987. The Conditions of the Working-Class in England. London: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 2006. “Social Parasites: How Tramps, Idle Youth, and Busy Entrepreneurs Impeded the Soviet March to Communism.” Cahiers du Monde russe 47 (1/2): 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosztó, László. 2018. “Was there a ‘Gypsy Problem’ in Socialist Romania? From Suppressing ‘Nationalism’ to Recognition of a National Minority.” Studia Sociologia 63 (2): 117–140.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1997. “ Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979 London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gledhill, John. 2000. Power and its Disguises. Anthropological Perspectives on Politics. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Golopenția, Anton, and Georgescu, Dumitru. 1948. “Populația Republicii Populare Române la 25 Ianuarie 1948; rezultatele provizorii ale recensământului [Population of the Romanian People’s Republic on January 25, 1948; provisional census results].” Probleme Economice (2): 7–47.Google Scholar
Hașdeu, Iulia. 2005. “Kaj MARFA. Comerțul de aluminiu și degradarea conditției femeii la rromi căldărari.” In Economia informală în România: Piețe, practici sociale și transformări ale statului după 1989 edited by Chelcea, Liviu and Mateescu, Oana, 289–314. București: Paideia.Google Scholar
Keil, Thomas, and Andreescu, Viviana. 1999. “Fertility Policy in Ceausescu’s Romania.” Journal of Family History 24 (4): 478–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kligman, Gail. 1992. “The Politics of Reproduction in Ceaușescu’s Romania: A Case Study in Political Culture.” East European Po/itia and Societies 6 (3): 364–418.Google Scholar
Klimova-Alexander, Ilona. 2006. “The Development and Institutionalization of Romani Representation and Administration. Part 3a: From National Organizations to International Umbrellas (1945–1970) - Romani Mobilization at the National Level.” Nationalities Papers 34 (5): 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Ian. 2012. Red Racisms: Racism in Communist and Post-Communist Contexts. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Thomas. 2019. Foucault’s Analysis of Modern Governmentality. A Critique of Political Reason. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Liégeois, Jean-Pierre, and Gheorghe, Nicolae. 1995. Roma/Gypsies: A European Minority. London: Minority Rights Group.Google Scholar
Lucassen, Leo. 1998. “A Blind Spot: Migratory and Travelling Groups in Western European Historiography.” In Gypsies and Other Itinerant Groups. A Socio-Historical Approach, edited by Lucassen, Leo, Willems, Wim and Cottaar, Annemarie, 135–152. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucassen, Leo, Willems, Wim, and Cottaar, Annemarie, eds. 1998. Gypsies and Other Itinerant Groups. A Socio-Historical Approach. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Manuela, ed. 2015a. Romii și regimul comunist din România. Marginalizare, integrare și opoziție . Vol 1 [The Roma and the communist regime in Romania. Marginalization, integration and opposition. Vol 1]. Cluj-Napoca: Mega.Google Scholar
Marin, Manuela, ed. 2015b. Romii și regimul comunist din România. Marginalizare, integrare și opoziție . Vol 2 . [The Roma and the communist regime in Romania. Marginalization, integration and opposition. Vol 2]. Cluj-Napoca: Mega.Google Scholar
Marushiakova, Elena, and Popov, Veselin. 2008. State Policies under Communism. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Robbie. 1997. “Theorizing Sedentarism: The Roots of Anti-nomadism.” In Gypsy Politics and Traveller Identity, edited by Acton, Thomas, 7–25. Hatfield, UK: University Of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Ryan, and Lever, John. 2015. “Europe’s Perennial ‘Outsiders’: A Processual Approach to Roma Stigmatization and Ghettoization.” Current Sociology 65 (5): 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prozorov, Sergei. 2017. “Biopolitics and Socialism: Foucault, Agamben, Esposito.” In The Routledge Handbook of Biopolitics, edited by Prozorov, Sergei and Rentea, Simona, 94–111. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Romanian Communist Party. 1977. Studiu privind situația social-economică a populației de țigani din țara noastră. The National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archives, Documentary archive, file 144, vol. 15, 1–11Google Scholar
Romanian Communist Party. 1981. Propuneri de completare a raportului privind situaţia socialeconomică a populaţiei de ţigani din România [Proposals for the completion of the report on the socio-economic situation of the Roma population in Romania]. The National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archives, Documentary archive, file 144, vol. 15, 221–223.Google Scholar
Romanian Workers’ Party. 1949. Problema țiganilor din Republica Populară România [The Gypsy question in the People’s Republic of Romania]. National Archives of Romania, Internal Organization Section of the Central Committee archive, file 93/1949, 1–8.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1996. “Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies.” In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government, edited by Barry, Andrew, Osborne, Thomas and Rose, Nikolas, 37–64. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, and Miller, Peter. 1992. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” The British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, O’Malley, Pat, and Valverde, Mariana. 2006. “Governmentality.” The Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2 (1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred, and Luckmann, Thomas. 1989. The Structures of the Life-World . Vol. 2. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1999. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sigley, Gary. 1996. “Governing Chinese Bodies: The Significance of Studies in the Concept of Govermentality for the Analysis of Goverment in China.” Economy and Society 25 (4): 457–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigley, Gary. 2006. “Chinese Governmentalities: Government, Governance and the Socialist Market Economy.” Economy and Society 35 (4): 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Carol. 1986. “Bulgarian Gypsies: Adaptation in a Socialist Context.” Nomadic Peoples (21/22): 51–62.Google Scholar
Sokolova, Vera. 2008. Cultural Politics of Ethnicity: Discourses on Roma in Communist Czechoslovakia Stuttgart: Verlag.Google Scholar
Stalin, Joseph. 1953. “Marxism and the National Question.” In J.V. Stalin Works . Volume 2 (1907–1913), edited by Stalin, Joseph, 300–381. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Stewart, Michael. 1993. “Gypsies, the Work Ethic, and Hungarian Socialism.” In Socialism. Ideals, Ideologies, and Local Practice, edited by Hann, C.M., 186–204. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stewart, Michael. 1997. The Time of the Gypsies. Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Surdu, Mihai. 2019. “Why the ‘Real’ Numbers on Roma are Fictitious: Revisiting Practices of Ethnic Quantification.” Ethnicities 19 (3): 486–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Becky. 2014. Another Darkness, Another Dawn: A History of Gypsies, Roma and Travellers. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Valiavicharska, Zhivka. 2010. “Socialist Modes of Governance and the ‘Withering Away of the State’: Revisiting Lenin’s State and Revolution.” Theory & Event 13 (2).Google Scholar
van Baar, Huub. 2011. Minority Representation, Memory and the Limits of Transnational Governmentality. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vincze, Enikő. 2014. “Faces and Causes of Roma Marginalization. Experiences from Romania.” In Faces and Causes of Roma Marginalization in Local Contexts, edited by Szalai, Júlia and Zentai, Violetta, 67–96. Budapest: Center for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Vincze, Enikő, and Hossu, Iulia-Elena, eds. 2014. Marginalizarea socio-teritorială a comunităţilor de romi din România : studii de caz în județele Alba, Arad, Călărași, Dolj și Iași [Socio-territorial marginalization of Roma communities in Romania: case studies in Alba, Arad, Călărași, Dolj and Iași counties]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Fundaţiei pentru Studii Europene.Google Scholar
Vincze, Enikő, Petrovici, Norbert, Raț, Cristina, and Picker, Giovanni, eds. 2019. Racialized Labour in Romania. Spaces of Marginality at the Periphery of Global Capitalism. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voicu, Mălina, and Popescu, Raluca. 2006. “Nașterea și căsătoria la populația de romi.” Calitatea Vieții 17 (3–4): 253–279.Google Scholar
Voiculescu, Cerasela. 2017. European Social Integration and the Roma: Questioning Neo-liberal Governmentality. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wamsiedel, Marius. 2021.“Temporal Typifications as an Organizational Resource: Experiential Knowledge and Patient Processing at the Emergency Department.” Time & Society. Published online ahead of print July 15, 2021. doi: 10.1177/0961463X211031881.Google Scholar
Zamfir, Cătălin, and Zamfir, Elena. 1993. Țiganii între ignorare și îngrijorare [The Gypsies: Between Concern and Neglect]. București: Alternative.Google Scholar