Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:13:06.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Estonia on the Border of Two Civilizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Estonia enjoys a very delicate geographic position. It is located not just in the neighborhood of Russia, which is modernizing or Westernizing with fluctuating success, but it is situated strategically on the border of two civilizations reminiscent of Samuel P. Huntington's thought-provoking article in the journal Foreign Affairs. However, Estonia has not become a borderland in the classical meaning of the term since the country belongs historically and integrally to the sphere of the so-called Lutheran-German civilization. For centuries this has blocked attempts from the East to incorporate the northern Baltics (which include Finland) into the Orthodox-Slavic Eastern civilization. In the context of conflicting civilizations, each such invasion has been not so much an ethnic matter but rather one of clashing civilizations and of a choice between two competing civilizations. In the last couple of years, Europe has once again witnessed the failure of one more Eastern assault that was launched with the signing in 1939 of the Hitler-Stalin agreement, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe and ex-USSR 

References

Notes

1. Samuel P. Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 3, Summer 1993, p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. George Soros, Nationalist Dictatorship Versus Open Society. Expanded Version of a Lecture Delivered at the Harward Club of New York. November 18, 1992, (New York: The Soros Foundation, 1993), p. 11.Google Scholar