Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:33:26.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Significance of Cultural Nationalism: The Slavophiles and Their Notion of a Russian Enlightenment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Susanna Rabow-Edling
Susanna Rabow-Edling*
Affiliation:
Department of East European Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden. Susanna.rabow-edling@eas1.uu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For nearly a century, the contrast between a cultural and a political form of nationalism has been upheld. In the early twentieth century, Fredrich Meinecke made a distinction between the political nation, or Staatsnation, based on a common political history and a shared constitution, and the cultural nation, Kulturnation, based on a shared cultural heritage. The most important distinction between the two is that while membership in the former is voluntary, membership in the cultural nation is a matter not of choice, but of common objective identity. Meinecke maintained that political nationalism derived from the spirit of 1789, i.e. from the idea of the self-determination and sovereignty of the nation. Cultural nationalism, in contrast, was a striving for national individuality, characteristic of anti-Enlightenment German thought.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 441 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. F. Meinecke, Cosmopolitanism and the National State (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1970), pp. 10, 12.Google Scholar

2. H. Kohn, The Idea of Nationalism (New York, Macmillan, 1945), pp. 3–4, 329–331. See J. Plamenatz, “Two Types of Nationalism,” in E. Kamenka, ed. Nationalism (London, Edward Arnold, 1976) for a similar distinction between Eastern and Western nationalism. Liah Greenfeld upholds this distinction between a culturally based “ethnic nationalism” and a political “civic nationalism” in her Nationalism. Five Roads to Modernity (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1993). See also M. Ignatieff, Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism (New York, Farrer, Strauss and Giroux, 1993).Google Scholar

3. M. Hughes, Nationalism and Society. Germany 1800–1945 (London, Arnold, 1988), pp. 22–23. Andrzej Walicki talks about two different types of Romantic nationalism: the progressive and the conservative. See his Philosophy and Romantic Nationalism: The Case of Poland (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1982), p. 77.Google Scholar

4. W. Kymlicka, “Misunderstanding Nationalism;” K. Nielsen, “Cultural Nationalism, Neither Ethnic nor Civic;” and B. Yack, “The Myth of the Civic Nation,” in R. Beiner, ed., Theorizing Nationalism (Albany, SUNYPress, 1999).Google Scholar

5. See E. Kedourie, Nationalism (London, Hutchinson, 1966), p. 58; E. Gellner, Nations and Nationalism (Oxford, Blackwell, 1983), pp. 57–61; A. D. Smith, Theories of Nationalism (London, Duckworth, 1971), pp. 171–211; J. Breuilly, Nationalism and the State (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1993), pp. 1–2; Greenfeld, Nationalism; Kohn, Idea of Nationalism; Hughes, Nationalism and Society.Google Scholar

6. F. C. Beiser, Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought 1790–1800 (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1992); J. Hutchinson The Dynamics of Cultural Nationalism: The Gaelic Revival and the Creation of the Irish Nation State (London, Allen & Unwin, 1987).Google Scholar

7. See also K. Yoshino, Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary Japan (London, Routledge, 1992); A-chin Hsiau, Contemporary Taiwanese Cultural Nationalism (London and New York, Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

8. Hutchinson, Dynamics of Cultural Nationalism , pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., pp. 9, 14–16; I. Berlin, Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas (London, Hogarth, 1976), p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. See A. Walicki, The Slavophile Controversy (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1975); A. Walicki, A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1979); M. Raeff, Russian Intellectual History. An Anthology (New Jersey, Humanities Press, 1978); A. Gleason, European and Muscovite: Ivan Kireevsky and the Origins of Slavophilism (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press 1972); Iu. Z. Iankovskii, Patriarkhalno-dvorianskaia utopiia (Moscow, Khadozhestven***naia Literatura, 1981); S. Carter, Russian Nationalism. Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (London, Pinter, 1990); Greenfeld, Nationalism. For a different view, see E. A. Dudzinskaia, Slavianofily v obshchestvennoi borbe (Moscow, 1983); Slavianofily v poreformennoi Rossii (Moscow, 1994); N. I. Tsimbaev, Slavianofilstvo: iz istorii russkoi obshchestvennoi-politicheskoi mysli XIX veka (Moscow, 1986); D. Saunders, Russia in the Age of Reaction and Reform 1801–1881 (London, Longman, 1992).Google Scholar

11. Walicki, The Slavophile Controversy, pp. 6, 450–454.Google Scholar

12. F. C. Copleston, Philosophy in Russia. From Herzen to Lenin and Berdyaev (Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press, 1986), p. 47.Google Scholar

13. N. V. Riasanovsky, Russia and the West in the Teaching of the Slavophiles (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1952), pp. 11, 154; Saunders, Russia in the Age of Reaction and Reform, pp. 117, 154–155, 162, 166; M. Malia, “What Is the Intelligentsia?” Daedalus, Summer 1960, p. 451; L. Schapiro, Rationalism and Nationalism in Russian Nineteenth-Century Political Thought (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1967), pp. 62–63, 67; Copleston, Philosophy in Russia, p. 47.Google Scholar

14. E. Wirtschafter, Social Identity in Imperial Russia (Dekalb, IL, Northern Illinois University Press, 1997), pp. 30, 17, 32.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., pp. 22, 47; D. Lieven, The Aristocracy in Europe, 1815–1914 (Basingstoke, Macmillan, England, 1992), pp. 214–215.Google Scholar

16. Wirtschafter, Social Identity in Imperial Russia, pp. 87, 97–98.Google Scholar

17. M. Raeff, “The People, the Intelligentsia and Russian Political Culture,” Political Studies, Vol. 41, 1993, pp. 96–97; R. Pipes, “The Historical Evolution of the Russian Intelligentsia,” Daedalus, Summer 1960, p. 488; Lieven, Aristocracy in Europe, pp. 19, 179–180.Google Scholar

18. Raeff, “The People, the Intelligentsia,” pp. 97–98.Google Scholar

19. D. Pospielovsky, “A Comparative Enquiry into Neo-Slavophilism and Its Antecedents in the Russian History of Ideas,” Soviet Studies , No. 3, 1979, p. 319; P. Christoff, An Introduction to Nineteenth-Century Slavophilism II: I. V. Kireevsky (The Hague, Mouton, 1972), p. 261; M. Raeff, Political Ideas and Institutions in Imperial Russia (Boulder, Westview Press, 1994), pp. 70–71.Google Scholar

20. M. Raeff, Origins of the Russian Intelligentsia: The Eighteenth-Century Nobility (New York, Harcourt, Brace & Wild, 1966), p. 170; M. Malia, “What Is the Intelligentsia?,” Daedalus, Summer 1960, p. 449; Saunders, Russia in the Age of Reaction and Reform, p. 148.Google Scholar

21. Malia, “What Is the Intelligentsia?,” p. 450.Google Scholar

22. Wirtschafter, Social Identity in Imperial Russia , pp. 167–168; N. V. Riasanovsky, “Notes on the Emergence and Nature of the Russian Intelligentsia,” in T. G. Stavrou, ed., Art and Culture in Nineteenth Century Russia (Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press, 1983), pp. 22–23.Google Scholar

23. Lieven, Aristocracy in Europe , p. 245.Google Scholar

24. Ibid.Google Scholar

25. Raeff, “The People, the Intelligentsia,” p. 98. The nobility were emancipated from compulsory service in 1762.Google Scholar

26. Lieven, Aristocracy in Europe , p. 245.Google Scholar

27. See Smith, Theories of Nationalism .Google Scholar

28. For the impact of Romanticism on contemporary Russian intellectuals, see Riasanovsky, Russia and the West in the Teaching of the Slavophiles; M. Malia, Alexander Herzen and the Birth of Russian Socialism 1812–1855, (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1961); E. C. Thaden, “The Beginnings of Romantic Nationalism in Russia,” American Slavic and East European Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1954, pp. 500–521; F. Steppun, “Nemetskii romantism i russkoe slavianofilstvo,” Russkaia Mysl, March 1910. For the beginning of the nineteenth century, see A. Martin, Romantics, Reformers, Reactionaries. Russian Conservative Thought and Politics in the Reign of Alexander I (Dekalb, IL, Northern Illinois University Press, 1997); Raeff, Political Ideas and Institutions.Google Scholar

29. A. Herzen, Selected Philosophical Works (Moscow, 1956), p. 94.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., pp. 12, 20.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., pp. 325–326.Google Scholar

32. V. F. Odoevsky, “Russkie nochi,” in Sochineniia kniazia V. F. Odoevskago (St Petersburg, Ivanov, 1844), pp. 313–314.Google Scholar

33. V. G. Belinsky, Selected Philosophical Works (Moscow, 1956), pp.47, 101, 321, 380.Google Scholar

34. I. V. Kireevsky, Izbrannye stati (Moscow, Sovremennik, 1984), p. 61.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., pp. 77–78.Google Scholar

36. A. S. Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii (Moscow, 1900–1914), Vol. 1, pp. 26–27, 80; Kireevsky, Izbrannye stati, pp. 71, 277; I. V. Kireevsky, “On the Nature of European Culture and Its Relation to the Culture of Russia,” in M. Raeff, ed., Russian Intellectual History: An Anthology (New York, Harcourt, 1966), pp. 192–194.Google Scholar

37. Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, Vol. 1, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar

38. Kireevsky, Izbrannye stati , p. 156.Google Scholar

39. Ibid., pp. 126, 118; Kireevsky, “On the Nature of European Culture,” p. 207.Google Scholar

40. Kireevsky Izbrannye stati , pp. 78, 97, 118.Google Scholar

41. Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, Vol. 1, pp. 26-21.Google Scholar

42. Kireevsky, “On the Nature of European Culture,” p. 207; Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, Vol. 1, pp. 66, 100–101.Google Scholar

43. Kireevsky, Izbrannye stati , pp. 77–78.Google Scholar

44. Kireevsky, “On the Nature of European Culture,” pp. 175, 195.Google Scholar

45. Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, Vol. 1, pp. 22, 28; Kireevsky, Izbrannye stati, pp. 153, 276–278.Google Scholar

46. See e.g . Belinsky, Selected Philosophical Works, pp. 205–206, 215, 381.Google Scholar

47. Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, Vol. 1, p. 66.Google Scholar

48. Ibid., pp. 27–28; Kireevsky, Izbrannye stati, pp. 193, 276–277.Google Scholar

49. Khomiakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, Vol. 1, pp. 59, 44; Vol. 3, p. 99.Google Scholar

50. Ibid., Vol. 1, pp. 27–28, Kireevsky, “On the Nature of European Culture,” p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. A. Walicki, A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1979), pp. 162–170.Google Scholar