Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:44:59.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A tale in stone and bronze: old/new strategies for political mobilization in the Republic of Macedonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Irena Stefoska  and
Darko Stojanov
Irena Stefoska*
Affiliation:
Institute of National History, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Darko Stojanov
Affiliation:
Institute of National History, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
*
∗Corresponding author. Email: istefoska@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The redesign of Skopje's main square and the wider central area in the last six years has been a top priority of the Macedonian government. The project, called Skopje 2014, provoked intense domestic debate and controversy as well as international reaction and concern. Although officials say that project's aim is to unify ethnic Macedonians, it has produced several lines of political, intra-ethnic/interethnic as well as intra-cultural/intercultural divisions in the fragile Macedonian society. The aim of the paper is to offer reflections about its mobilizing potential among ethnic Macedonians in a set of social, economic, and political contexts. In that sense, four areas of mobilization are suggested: (1) around new identity markers; (2) around the name dispute and against threats (real or imagined) to the ethnic and national identity; (3) against the internal Other, that is, the ethnic Albanian community, as well as critics of these identity politics; and (4) in reaction to the global financial crisis and problems within the EU.

Keywords

Skopje 2014mobilizationethno-national identityantiquizationhistorical mythsmonumentsOthereuro-skepticism
Type
Special Section: Political Mobilization in East Central Europe
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 356 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

References

Angelovska, Despina. 2014. “(Mis)representations of Transitional Justice: Contradictions in Displaying History, Memory and Art in the Skopje 2014 Project.” In The Arts of Transitional Justice Culture, Activism, and Memory after Atrocity, edited by Rush, Peter D., and Simi, Olivera, 173–193. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Assmann, Aleida. 2002. Rad na nacionalnom pamćenju. Belgrade: Biblioteka XX vek.Google Scholar
Berger, Stefan, and Lorenz, Chris, eds. 2008. The Contested Nation: Ethnicity, Class, Religion and Gender in National Histories. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. 1985. Work on Myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bojadzievska, Maja, and Talevska, Irina, eds. 2013. Fašizam, teorija i memorija. Skopje: Sigmapres.Google Scholar
Boševski, Tome, and Tentov, Aristotel. 2005. “Tracing the Script and the Language of the Ancient Macedonians.” Contributions. Section for Mathematical and Technical Sciences of the Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts 26 (2): 7–50.Google Scholar
Bottici, Ciara. 2007. A Philosophy of Political Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2008. “The Forms of Capital.” In Cultural Theory: An Anthology, edited by Szeman, Imre, and Kaposy, Timothy, 81–93. Oxford: Wiley – Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith, and Stefoska, Irena. 2010. “Greek Gifts: Archaeophilia, Ochlocracy and Monochromatism in Contemporary Macedonia.” Paper presented at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington D.C., March 10.Google Scholar
Brunnbauer, Ulf. 2004. “Historiography, Myths and the Nation in the Republic of Macedonia.” In (Re)Writing History: Historiography in Southeast Europe after Socialism, edited by Brunnbauer, Ulf, 165–200. Munster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Bugjevac, Dejan. 2010. “Skopje 2014 – omaž na kichot.” In Kradat grad! zbornik tekstovi za proektot Skopje 2014, 15–22. Skopje: Templum.Google Scholar
Čausidis, Nikos. 2013. Proektot Skopje 2014 – Skici za edno naredno istrazuvanje. Skopje: Nikos Čausidis.Google Scholar
Davies, Catriona. 2011. “Is Macedonia's Capital Being Turned into a Theme Park?” CNN, October 10. Accessed February 6, 2016. http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/04/world/europe/macedonia-skopje-2014/index.html.Google Scholar
Dičev, Ivajlo. 2003. “Eros identiteta.” In Balkan kao metafora: između globalizacije i fragmentacije, edited by Bjelić, Dušan, and Savić, Obrad, 269–284. Belgrade: Beogradski krug.Google Scholar
Georgievski, Boris. 2009. “The Past Threatens the Future” (), Globus, October 27. Accessed September 5, 2014. http://www.globusmagazin.com.mk/? ItemID=4112317F55A1D84FA56EEF99C84E961B.Google Scholar
Graan, Andrew. 2013. “Counterfeiting the Nation? Skopje 2014 and the Politics of Nation Branding in Macedonia.” Cultural Anthropology 28 (1): 161–179.Google Scholar
Grandits, Hannes, and Brunnbauer, Ulf. 2013. “The Ambiguous Nation. Socialist and Post-Socialist Nation-Building in Southeastern Europe in Perspective.” In The Ambiguous Nation. Case Studies from Southeastern Europe in the 20th Century, edited by Granndits, Hannes, and Brunnbauer, Ulf, 9–13. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Kolozova, Katerina. 2013. Skopje 2014 Project and its Effects on the Perceptions of Macedonian Identity among the Citizens of Skopje. Skopje: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities. Accessed February 6, 2016. http://isshs.edu.mk/documents/1.-Sk2014-ENG.pdf.Google Scholar
K⊘lsto, Pal, ed. 2005. Myths and Boundaries in South-Eastern Europe. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Koteska, Jasna. 2011. Troubles with History: Skopje 2014.” In Art Margins-online, December 29. Accessed September 5, 2014. http://www.artmargins.com/index.php/2-articles/655-troubles-with-history-skopje-2014.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Till. 2013. “Macedonian Makeover: Europe's Failing Capital of Kitsch.” Der Spiegel, November 12. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/macedonian-capital-skopje-gets-kitsch-makeover-via-skopje2014-project-a-933154.html.Google Scholar
Mijalkovic, Milan, and Urbanek, Katerina. 2011. Skopje svetskoto kopile. Arhitektura na podeleniot grad. Skopje: Goten.Google Scholar
Mosse, George. 1975. La nacionalizzazione delle masse: Simbolismo politico e movimenti di massa in Germania (1815–1933). Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino.Google Scholar
Mosse, George. 2013. “Estetikata na politikata.” In Fašizam, teorija, memorija, edited by Bojadzievska, Maja, and Talevska, Irina, 133–168. Skopje: Sigmapres.Google Scholar
Neofotistos, Vasiliki. 2011. “Going Home to Pakistan: Identity and Its Discontents in Southeastern Europe.” Identities 18 (4): 291–316.Google Scholar
Nikolovski, Dimitar. 2013. Traitors, Hirelings and Sandwich-Protesters: Civil Activism in the Macedonian Public Discourse. Skopje: Macedonian Center for European Training.Google Scholar
Panov, Mitko B. 2008. “Antičkite Makedonci vo rana Vizantija (IV-VI ). Posvedočen kontinuitet.” In Makedonija pomegju Evropskata Unija i vizantiskiot komonvelt, edited by Donev, Jovan, Panov, Mitko B., and Stefkovski, Zlatko, 33–43. Skopje: Evro Balkan.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernest. 1995. “What is a Nation?” In The Nationalism Reader, edited by Dahbour, Omar, and Ishay, Micheline R., 143–155. Amherst, NY: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Schöpflin, George. 2000. Nations, Identity, Power. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1997. “The ‘Golden Age’ and National Renewal.” In Myths and Nationhood, edited by Hosking, Geoffrey, and Schöpflin, George, 36–60. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorel, Georges. 2004. Reflections on Violence. Edited by Jennings, Jeremy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanovski, Ljupčo. 1997. “The Apologetic Strategies in Macedonian.” Balkanistica 10: 372–380.Google Scholar
Stojanov, Darko. 2010. “In Search of Autochthony: A Case Study of the Great Migration Period as Presented in History Textbooks in Macedonia.” Der Donauraum 50 (3–4): 225–234.Google Scholar
Stojanovski, Filip. 2011. “Macedonia: Violent Interethnic Incident on Skopje Fortress.” Global Voices, February 15. Accessed September 5, 2014. http://globalvoicesonline.org/2011/02/15/macedonia-violent-interethnic-incident-on-skopje-fortress/.Google Scholar
Vangeli, Anastas. 2011. Antička segasnost: osvrt kon grcko-makedonskiot spor za aleksnadrovoto nasledstvo. Skopje: Templum.Google Scholar
Vouri, Sofia. 2001. “Antiquity as a Source of National Documentation in Balkan History Textbooks (1991–1996).” In The Image of the ‘Other'/Neighbour in the School Textbooks of the Balkan Countries (Proceedings of the International Conference, Thessaloniki, October 16–18, 1998), edited by Xochellis, Panagiotis D. and Toloudi, F. L., 75–90. Thessaloniki-Athens.Google Scholar
Wölfl, Adelheid. 2011. “Antikistan auf dem Balkan.” Der Standard, October 24. http://derstandard.at/1319181109490/Antikistan-auf-dem-Balkan.Google Scholar