Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T02:22:46.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

F.K. Juenger, Choice of Law and Multistate Justice, M. Nijhoff Publ., Dordrecht1992, 265 pp., Dfl. 159/$ 94/£ 63·75. ISBN 0-7923-1469-7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Leonel Pereznieto Castro
Leonel Pereznieto Castro
Affiliation:
Mexico National University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 385 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Other German conflicts scholars who made the United States their home are Nadelmann, Nussbaum, Rabel, Rheinstein, Riesenfeld and Schlesinger.

2. Two American cases, Paris Air Crash of 3 March 1974, 399 F.Supp. 732(CD Cal. 1975); The Bremen v. Zapata Off Shore Co. 407 US 1 (1972); and the Swiss Federal Court decision in Cardo v. Cardo, of 11 July 1968, 94 BGE II 65.

3. See H. Muir Watt, Book Review, in Revue crit. d.i.p. (1993) pp. 392–393.

4. ‘Das Problem der Qualifikation’, Rabels Zeitschrift (1931) p. 241.

5. Prof. Andreas F. Lowenfeld's review in 88 AJIL (1994) pp. 184, 186, points out that while he agrees with the author on the need to promote justice, he teaches his students that once they become attorneys, they have to show that justice requires the application of the law that favours their clients. To him, Prof. Juenger's choice of illustrations ‘is too simple’.

6. See n. 3 supra.