Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:21:22.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III: On the Other Hand…

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

John Mahoney SJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 66 , Issue 780 , June 1985 , pp. 288 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 AAS 54 (1962), pp. 791–2Google Scholar. This was Pope John's famous ‘prophets of doom’ speech.

2 ‘cuius munus est doctrinam de fide et moribus in universo catholico orbe tutari’, AAS 57 (1965), p. 954Google Scholar.

3 Ratzinger, J., Das neue Volk Gottes. Entwürfe zur Ekklesiologie, Dusseldorf, 1972, pp. 152–177Google Scholar.

4 ‘Una vero est fidelium universalis Ecclesia, extra quam nullus omnino salvatur’, DS 802. Cf. DS 575, 792. For Cyprian, cf. PL 3, 1123–24; 4, 503–504.

5 DS 870, 1351.

6 DS 2731.

7 DS 2866–67, 2917.

8 DS 3869–70, 3821; Lumen Gentium (=LG), 16.

9 In supra, n. 3, p. 168, n. 30.

10 DS 3866.

11 Cf. LG 9, 48; Gaudium et Spes (= GS), 45; etc.

12 In supra, n. 2, p. 953.

13 LG 16; GS 22; Ad Gentes (=AG), 9; Optatam Totius (=OT), 16.

14 AG 9.

15 Cf. GS 11.40.

16 OT 16.

17 GS 33; cf. 62.

18 GS 44.

19 Ratzinger, J., ‘The Pastoral Implications of Episcopal Collegiality’, Concilium: Dogma, no. 1 (1965), p. 30Google Scholar. Repeated in the German n. 3 supra, p. 67.

20 Ratzinger, J., ‘Announcements and Prefatory Notes of Explanation’, in Vorgrimler, H. (ed.), Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II, Herder, 1967, vol. 1, p. 300Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., pp. 303–304. Cf LG 22, and Nota praevia, nn. 3–4.

22 Vorgrimler, p. 304.

23 Ibid.

24 The outstanding conciliar statement on the local Church appears like a comet in LG 26. Rahner explains, in Vorgrimler (n. 20 supra, p. 216), that this was a late interpolation to meeet complaints of a too one‐sidedly “universal” treatment of the Church. Cf. also Rahner, , Theological Investigations, vol. 10, London, 1973, pp. 9–11Google Scholar and (on Ratzinger's charge that Rahner is extremely radical on the local Church) p. 101, n. 27.