Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:10:15.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quotidian realities of organic mothering in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2017

İrem Soysal Al
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores how mothers in Turkey respond to the current atmosphere of food fear and the neoliberal rhetoric of the individualization of risks, as well as interrogating the class dimension of the varying ways in which mothers experience pressures regarding feeding their children in an organic manner. The article primarily suggests that mothers adopt different organic food strategies across class divisions—particularly through class-specific definitions of “organic”—so as to deal in stratified ways with the challenges organic feeding brings. It indicates that organic mothering practices have been incorporated into the lifestyle and cultural distinctions of middle-class families and reinforced by rural nostalgia. Contrary to this, ideas about “the organic” and rural nostalgia are mostly translated as “home-made” for lower-class families. Relying on sixteen in-depth interviews with mothers in İstanbul and on an analysis of posts and comments found on a mothering blog, this article offers empirical findings on analyses of organic mothering and risk from a standpoint and location that have been largely ignored in the existing literature. It also contributes to analyses about neoliberal transformations in the Turkish food market and the growing literature on family and neoliberalism under the government of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) by bringing a research-based view on the subjective experiences of mothers into a discourse that is rather political in nature as well as into policy research discussions.

Keywords

Organic motheringorganic foodrisksanxietydistinction.
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 57 , November 2017 , pp. 61 - 84
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

İrem Soysal Al, Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Sociology, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, SOS Z33, 34450, Sarıyer, İstanbul, Turkey, ial15@ku.edu.tr

References

Ahmed, Sara. “Affective Economies.” Social Text 22 (2004): 117–139. doi: 10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. The Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Aydın, Zülküf. “Neo-liberal Transformation of Turkish Agriculture.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 2 (2010): 149–187; doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00241.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications, 1992.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. London: Routledge, 1984.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups.” Theory and Society 14, no. 6 (1985): 723–744. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657373.Google Scholar
Beagan, Brenda, Chapman, Gwen E., D’Sylva, Andrea, and Bassett, B. Raewyn. “It’s Just Easier for Me to Do It: Rationalizing the Family Division of Foodwork.” Sociology 42 (2008): 653–671. doi: 10.1177/0038038508091621.Google Scholar
Cairns, Kate, Johnston, Josée, and MacKendrick, Norah. “Feeding the ‘Organic Child’: Mothering through Ethical Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (2013): 96–117; doi: 10.1177/1469540513480162.Google Scholar
Cairns, Kate, DeLaat, Kim, Baumann, Shyon, and Johnston., Josée “The Caring, Committed EcoMom: Consumer Ideals and Lived Realities.” In Green Consumption: The Global Rise of Eco-Chic. Edited by Bart Barendregt and Rivke Jaffe. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014. 100–114.Google Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. “Sociology After Society.” In Sociology After Postmodernism. Edited by David Owen. London: Sage Publications, 1997. 205–228.Google Scholar
Dedeoğlu, Ö. Ayla. “Discourses of Motherhood and Consumption Practices of Turkish Mothers.” Business and Economics Research Journal 1, no. 3 (2010): 1–15.Google Scholar
DeVault, Marjorie L. Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hays, Sharon. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Johnston, Josée and Baumann, Shyon. “Democracy versus Distinction: A Study of Omnivorousness in Gourmet Food Writing.” AJS: American Journal of Sociology 113, no. 1 (2007): 165–204; doi: 10.1086/518923.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar and Yenal, Zafer. Bildiğimiz Tarımın Sonu: Küresel İktidar ve Köylülük. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2013.Google Scholar
Kılıç, Azer. “Gender, Family and Children at the Crossroads of Social Policy Reform in Turkey: Alternating Between Familialism and Individualism.” In Children, Gender and Families in Mediterranean Welfare States. Edited by Mimi Ajzenstadt, and John Gal. London: Springer, 2010. 165–179.Google Scholar
Kozinets, Robert V. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage Publications, 2010.Google Scholar
Knaak, Stephanie J. “Contextualising Risk, Constructing Choice: Breastfeeding and Good Mothering in Risk Society.” Health, Risk & Society 12 (2010): 345–355; doi: 10.1080/13698571003789666.Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah. Food, the Body and the Self. London: Sage Publications, 1996.Google Scholar
Marshall, Joyce L., Godfrey, Mary and Renfrew, Mary J.. “Being a ‘Good Mother’: Managing Breastfeeding and Merging Identities.” Social Science & Medicine 65, no. 10 (2007): 2147–2159. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, Elizabeth. “Risk, Responsibility, and Rhetoric in Infant Feeding.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29 (2000): 219–325. doi: 10.1177/089124100129023927.Google Scholar
O’Malley, Pat. Risk, Uncertainty and Government. London: Glasshouse, 2004.Google Scholar
Öztan, Ece. “Domesticity of Neo-liberalism: Family, Sexuality and Gender in Turkey.” In Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony . Edited by İsmet Akça, Ahmet Bekmen, and Barış Alp Özden. London: Pluto Press, 2014. 174–187.Google Scholar
Peterson, Alan, Tanner, Claire and Fraser, Suzanne. “Practicing Food Anxiety: Making Australian Mothers Responsible for Their Families’ Dietary Decisions.” Food and Foodways: Explorations in the History and Culture of Human Nourishment 22, no. 3 (2014): 175–197. doi: 10.1080/07409710.2014.935671.Google Scholar
Petryna, Adriana. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens After Chernobyl. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Prieur, Annick and Savage, Mike. “Emerging Forms of Cultural Capital.” European Societies 15, no. 2 (2013): 246–266. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2012.748930.Google Scholar
Rutz, Henri and Balkan, Erol. Reproducing Class: Education, Neo-liberalism and the Rise of the New Middle Class in Turkey. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Szasz, Andrew. Shopping Our Way to Safety: How We Changed from Protecting the Environment to Protecting Ourselves. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Starr, Martha A. “The Social Economics of Ethical Consumption: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Socio-Economics 38, no. 6 (2009): 916–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yenal, Zafer. “Türkiye’de Tarım ve Gıda Üretiminin Yeniden Yapılanması ve Uluslararasılaşması.” Toplum ve Bilim 88 (Spring 2001): 32–55.Google Scholar