Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T06:15:03.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Underground literature and its influence on youth in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Erik Mortenson ,
Duygu Ergun  and
Selen Erdoğan
Erik Mortenson
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Comparative Literature, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Sarıyer, İstanbul, Turkey, EMORTENSON@ku.edu.tr.
Duygu Ergun
Affiliation:
Department of Turkish Language and Literature, Boğaziçi University, 34342 Bebek, İstanbul, Turkey, duygu.ergun20@gmail.com.
Selen Erdoğan
Affiliation:
School of Languages, Sabancı University, Orta Mahalle, Üniversite Caddesi, No: 27, 34956 Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey, selenerdogan@sabanciuniv.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the impact underground literature (yeraltı edebiyatı) has on influencing the opinions and beliefs of Turkey’s youth regarding issues of contemporary importance. In order to understand the relevance of this genre to Turkish youth culture, we have not only examined the debate surrounding the topic in popular and academic circles, but also asked the readers themselves their opinions about their experience with the genre (in both its imported Western and homegrown Turkish variants) and its relevance to their lives. For our purposes, the effect of such texts on readers is the primary focus, and ours is the first mixed-media study to conduct a methodological, data-based investigation into the composition and opinions of underground literature’s readers. Thus, our study supplements a lack in the existing scholarship by offering concrete qualitative and quantitative data that will better elucidate our knowledge of the relationship between underground literature and Turkish youth attitudes, as well as the potential the genre might hold for the future of Turkey’s youth.

Keywords

Underground literatureyouth culturepoliticsethicsreligiongender and sexualityviews toward the West
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 52 , May 2015 , pp. 77 - 104
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Authors’ Note: We would like to thank Fatoş Gökşen, Cem Bico, Tanfer Tunç, Işıl Baş, Ahmet Beşe, and Zafer Parlak for their support of this project. This project was funded by a generous grant from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, TÜBİTAK).

References

Ahmad, Feroz. The Making of Modern Turkey. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Akarsu, Hikmet Temel. “Soruşturma.” In the dossier entitled “Türkiye’de ‘Yeraltı Edebiyatı’ Var mı?” Varlık Dergisi 1169 (February 2005): 14–24.Google Scholar
Akaş, Cem. “Yeraltından Banknotlar.” Notos Kitap 29 (August–September 2011): 32–33.Google Scholar
Ayhan, Ömer. “Türk Edebiyatının Yumuşak Karnı.” Kitaplık Dergisi Dosya Konusu: Edebiyatımızda Kötücül 103 (March 2007): 78–81.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Translated by Richard Miller. New York: Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibel and Kasaba, Reşat, eds. Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey. Washington: University of Washington, 1997.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budick, Sanford and Iser, Wolfgang. The Translatability of Cultures: Figurations of the Space Between. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Çakmakçı, Osman. “Edebiyatın ‘Yeraltı’ Damarı.” Milliyet Sanat Dergisi. Accessed online on November 4, 2004, http://www.milliyet.com.tr/ozel/kitap/041104/02.html.Google Scholar
Çileli, Meral and Tezer, Esin. “Life and Value Orientations of Turkish University Students.” Adolescence 33 (1998): 219–228.Google ScholarPubMed
Demir, İlkay. “The Development and Current State of Youth Research in Turkey: An Overview.” Young 20 (2012): 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, Şenol. “Yerin Dibi!” Notos Kitap (August–September 2011): 28–30.Google Scholar
Fergökçe, Merve. “Yeraltı Edebiyatı.” SabitFikir. Accessed online on October 5, 2009, http://www.sabitfikir.com/dosyalar/yeralti-edebiyati.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in this Class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gaines, Donna. Teenage Wasteland: Suburbia’s Dead End Kids. New York: Pantheon, 1991.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic, 1973.Google Scholar
Genç, Kaya. “Take a Shot Now.” Theparisreview.org. Accessed online on August 20, 2013, http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2013/08/20/take-a-shot-now/.Google Scholar
Giroux, Henry A. Disturbing Pleasures. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer, ed. İslamın Kamusal Yüzleri. İstanbul: Metis, 2000.Google Scholar
Griswold, Wendy. “Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britian, and the West Indies.” American Journal of Sociology 92, no. no. 5 (March 1987): 1077–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, Wendy. Bearing Witness: Readers, Writers, and the Novel in Nigeria. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, Wendy. “Recent Moves in the Sociology of Literature.” Annual Review of Sociology 19 (1993): 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart and Jefferson, Tony, eds. Resistance through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain. London: Hutchinson, 1976.Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Huq, Rupa. Beyond Subculture: Pop, Youth, and Identity in a Postcolonial World. Oxford, UK: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Translated by Timothy Bahti. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kahraman, Hasan Bülent. “Kötülük, Yeraltı Edebiyatı ve Yerüstü.” In the dossier entitled “Türkiye’de ‘Yeraltı Edebiyatı’ Var mı?” Varlık Dergisi 1169 (February 2005): 8–13.Google Scholar
Kahraman, Hasan Bülent. “Yerüstünden Yeraltı Edebiyatına Bakmak.” Notos Kitap 29 (August–September 2011): 22–26.Google Scholar
Karataş, Evren. “Türkiye’de Yeraltı Edebiyatı ve Hakan Günday’ın Romanlarında Yeraltı Edebiyatının İzleri.” Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken – Journal of World of Turks 2, no. 1 (2010): 89–113.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, Deniz and Saktanber, Ayşe, eds. Fragments of Culture: The Everyday of Modern Turkey. London and New York: I.B. Tauris and Co., 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüküslü, Demet. Türkiye’de Gençlik Miti: 1980 Sonrası Türkiye Gençliği. İstanbul: İletişim, 2009.Google Scholar
Marakoğlu, Ozan. “Edebiyatın Edepsizliği ya da Tutucu Olmayan Bütün Metinler Üstüne.” Notos Kitap, (August–September 2011): 47–49.Google Scholar
Mortenson, Erik. “Importing Counterculture: On the Road’s Turkish Reception.” In The Transnational Turn in American Studies: Turkey and the United States. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, 2012: 119–140.Google Scholar
Mortenson, Erik. “The ‘Underground’ Reception of the Beats in Turkey.” Comparative American Studies: An International Journal 11 (2013): 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muggleton, David. Inside Subculture: The Postmodern Meaning of Style (Dress, Body, Culture). Oxford: Berg, 2000.Google Scholar
Nardocchio, Elaine F. Reader Response to Literature: The Empirical Dimension. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.Google Scholar
Neyzi, Leyla. “Object or Subject? The Paradox of Youth in Turkey.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 33 (2001): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öğüt, Hande. “Şiddet, Pornografi, Haz, Bedensellik.” Notos Kitap (August–September 2011): 34–38.Google Scholar
Öktem, Altay. Şeytan Aletleri (Fanzinler, Demolar, Fotokopi Afişler). İstanbul: Varlık Yayınları, 2000.Google Scholar
Öktem, Altay. “Yeraltı Edebiyatının Temel Özellikleri ve Edebiyatımızda Yeraltı.” Notos Kitap (August–September 2011): 16–21.Google Scholar
Öktem, Altay. “Yeraltı Edebiyatı.” In the dossier entitled “Türkiye’de ‘Yeraltı Edebiyatı’ Var mı?” Varlık Dergisi (February 2005): 3–7.Google Scholar
Polat, Tayfun. “Alt Üst Oldu.” Notos Kitap (August–September 2011): 44–46.Google Scholar
Radway, Janice. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Şafak, Halim. “Altkültürden Orta Sınıfa Argo ya da Büyük Normallik!” Accessed online on February 3, 2015, http://kaldirimkultursanat.blogspot.com.tr/2012/06/dosya-argonun-otoritesi.html.Google Scholar
Saktanber, Ayşe. “Women and the Iconography of Fear: Islamization in Post-Islamist Turkey.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 32 (2006): 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, Susan Rubin and Crosman, Inge, eds. The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, Jane P., ed. Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Molly Abel. Reading Cultures: The Construction of Readers in the Twentieth Century. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Uçkan, Özgür. “Bir ‘Eylem’ Olarak ‘Yeraltı Edebiyatı.” Notos Kitap (August–September 2011): 40–43.Google Scholar