Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:31:17.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fungal species-specific responses of ectomycorrhizal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) to elevated [CO2]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

A. GORISSEN
Affiliation:
Plant Research International, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
TH. W. KUYPER
Affiliation:
Wageningen Agricultural University, Department of Environmental Sciences, Subdepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, P.O. Box 8005, 6700 EC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Ectomycorrhizal seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) inoculated with the nitrotolerant Laccaria bicolor and the nitrophobic Suillus bovinus were exposed to ambient (350 μl l−1) and elevated (700 μl l−1) [CO2]. After 79 d the seedlings were labelled for 28 d with 14CO2, after which they were harvested. 14C was determined in shoots, roots plus mycorrhizas, soil, and below-ground respiration; nitrogen was determined in shoots and roots. Total net 14C uptake increased under elevated [CO2]. The extra carbon did not increase the shoot mass but was translocated to the roots and resulted in a decreased shoot-to-root ratio in the Suillus-inoculated seedlings. Laccaria-inoculated seedlings did not incorporate the additional carbon in root or fungal tissue but only increased below-ground respiration. S. bovinus acquired or transferred nitrogen better than L. bicolor and enabled the seedlings to perform better with regard to net carbon uptake under elevated [CO2]. This resulted in nitrogen concentrations in shoots of Suillus-inoculated seedlings that were twice as high as in Laccaria-inoculated seedlings, irrespective of [CO2]. The higher nitrogen concentration in the shoots resulted in a doubling of the 14C uptake per unit shoot mass. Our results suggest that the ability of ectomycorrhizal Scots pine seedlings to respond positively to elevated atmospheric [CO2] is strongly fungal-species specific.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)