^{page 369 note 1} The first major attempt at this problem appears to have been made by Semler, , in his Paraphrasis Epistolae ad Romanos (1769)Google Scholar, which contained a ‘Dissertatio De Duplici Appendice Huius Epistolae’, pp. 277–311. The question had been publicly debated, at his instance, during the two preceding years.

^{page 369 note 2} The Epistle to the Romans (London, 1957), p. 13.Google Scholar

^{page 369 note 3} An die Römer (Tübingen), p. 76.Google ScholarPubMed

^{page 369 note 4} The Epistle of Paul to the Romans (London), p. xix.Google Scholar

^{page 369 note 5} ‘The Epistle to the Romans’, in The Interpreter's Bible, IX, 366.Google Scholar

^{page 369 note 6} Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament (Edinburgh, 1918), p. 135Google Scholar This hypothesis was first advanced by Schultz, in 1829.Google Scholar

^{page 369 note 7} Light from the Ancient East (Eng. tr. London, 1927), p. 234.Google Scholar

^{page 370 note 1} Paul's Epistle to the Romans (London, 1947), p. 24.Google Scholar

^{page 370 note 2} ‘St Paul's Letter to the Romans—and Others’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, XXXI (1948), 236 f.Google Scholar

^{page 370 note 3} Op. cit. pp. 234 f.Google Scholar

^{page 370 note 4} See Oxyrhynchus Papyri, x, ed. Grenfell, B. P. and Hunt, A. S. (London, 1914)Google Scholar, ad loc. Also Select Papyri, ed. Hunt, A. S. and Edgar, C. C. (Loeb, London, 1932), no. 137.Google Scholar

^{page 370 note 5} Op. cit. p. 235.Google Scholar

^{page 371 note 1} Op. cit.

^{page 371 note 2} Op. cit. p. 235 n. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 371 note 3} P. Oxy. 32.Google Scholar

^{page 371 note 4} Op. cit. p. 236.Google Scholar

^{page 371 note 5} Op. cit. p. 137.Google Scholar

^{page 372 note 1} Op. cit. pp. 237 f.Google Scholar

^{page 372 note 2} Zuntz, G., The Text of the Epistles (the Schweich Lectures, 1946) (London, 1953), p. 227.Google Scholar

^{page 372 note 3} Op cit. pp. 224–40.Google Scholar

^{page 372 note 4} Op. cit. p. 237.Google Scholar

^{page 372 note 5} Op. cit. p. 13.Google Scholar

^{page 372 note 6} This paper was read as a communication at the Fourth International Conference on New Testament Studies at Oxford in September 1969.