No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Wagnerian Battle for Souls: Parsifal and the Crisis in American Protestantism, 1882–1904
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2020
Abstract
The Metropolitan Opera premiere of Richard Wagner's Parsifal in December 1903 stirred what was arguably the first American religious controversy over an artistic event to claim national attention in the twentieth century. Although the outcome was predictable – the protests appeared only to fuel box office success – the significance lies in what this controversy reveals about the music drama's most ardent opponents and supporters at a key moment in American religious history. The 1903 Parsifal controversy unfolded in the midst of a crisis in American Protestantism, as conservative establishment Protestants defended their weakening hold on American culture, and their theologically liberal brethren viewed that same culture as both a source of spiritual inspiration and a cause for redemption. Drawing primarily upon accounts published in the New York press, nationally circulated periodicals (including strongly partisan contributions to the debate by The Musical Courier), and the writings of several prominent Protestant clergy and lay leaders, this reception study argues that the religious controversy surrounding the 1903 Parsifal production was a substantive skirmish in this American Protestant crisis, and brought forward competing interpretations of the music drama which highlighted the cultural implications of what had been, until that point, largely a theological dispute. Conservative response fastened onto elements of the drama found to be sacrilegious, while liberal response was conditioned by its kinship to the nineteenth-century phenomenon of Kunstreligion, and a broad view of redemption that extended beyond the individual soul to the artwork and the artist, and to all of culture.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
I am grateful for the substantive comments of the anonymous reviewers of this article, as well as the insights and encouragement of a number of colleagues along the way, including Gerald Sittser (Whitworth University), John Schmalzbauer (Missouri State University), and Paul Munson (Grove City College).
References
1 ‘Presbyterians Object to “Parsifal”,’ The New York Times, 15 December 1903.
2 Marty, Martin E., Pilgrims in Their Own Land: 500 Years of Religion in America (Boston: Little, Brown, 1984): 307Google Scholar.
3 Tanner, Michael, Wagner (London: HarperCollins, 1996): 197–9Google Scholar.
4 Kienzle, Ulrike, ‘Parsifal and Religion: A Christian Music Drama?’, trans. A., Mary Cicora, in A Companion to Wagner's Parsifal, ed. Kinderman, William and Syer, Katherine Rae (Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2005): 81–130Google Scholar.
5 Beckett, Lucy, Richard Wagner, Parsifal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981): 129–49Google Scholar.
6 Bell, Richard H., Wagner's Parsifal: An Appreciation in the Light of His Theological Journey (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2013)Google Scholar.
7 Sessa, Anne Dzamba, ‘At Wagner's Shrine: British and American Wagnerians’, in Wagnerism in European Culture and Politics, ed. Large, David C. and Weber, William (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985): 246–74Google Scholar.
8 Large, David C. and Weber, William, eds, Wagnerism in European Culture and Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985): 16Google Scholar.
9 Horowitz, Joseph, Wagner Nights: An American History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994): 189–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Horowitz, Joseph, ‘“Sermons in Tones”: Sacralization as a Theme in American Classical Music’, American Music 16 (1998): 319–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Frederick Hale, ‘American Christians for and against Parsifal: Debating the Holy Grail Opera in New York’, In Die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi 51/1 (27 February 2017), https://indieskriflig.org.za/ (accessed 26 November 2019).
12 Winthrop S. Hudson, American Protestantism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961): 128.
13 ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof …’.
14 Marty, Pilgrims in Their Own Land, 164.
15 Jon Butler, Grant Wacker and Randall Balmer, Religion in American Life: A Short History (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003): 282–9.
16 Susan Jacoby, Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism (New York: Henry Holt, 2004): 139, 144.
17 Butler, Wacker, and Balmer, Religion in American Life, 288.
18 Gary J. Dorrien, The Making of American Liberal Theology: Imagining Progressive Religion, 1805–1900, 1st edn (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001): xvi.
19 Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Aids to Reflection: In the Formation of a Manly Character on the Several Grounds of Prudence, Morality, and Religion: Illustrated by Select Passages from Our Elder Divines, Especially from Archbishop Leighton (Burlington: C. Goodrich, 1829): 137.
20 James Freeman Clarke, James Freeman Clarke: Autobiography, Diary and Correspondence (Houghton, Mifflin, 1891): 39–40.
21 Dorrien, The Making of American Liberal Theology, xvii.
22 Martin E. Marty, Modern American Religion, vol 1: The Irony of It All (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986): 17.
23 Dorrien, The Making of American Liberal Theology, 261.
24 George H. Schriver, Dictionary of Heresy Trials in American Christianity (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1997): 48.
25 As a product of the neo-orthodox movement that arose in the middle of the twentieth century, Christ and Culture is itself a response to nineteenth-century theological liberalism. While Niebuhr's work is now several decades old and not without its critics, Christ and Culture nevertheless remains a useful theoretical framework for an historical understanding of theological responses to culture among fin-de-siècle American Protestants.
26 H. Richard Niebuhr, Christ and Culture, 50th anniversary expanded edition (New York: HarperCollins, 2001): 10.
27 Niebuhr, Christ and Culture, 43–44.
28 Niebuhr, Christ and Culture, xlv.
29 Susanna Grossman-Vendrey, Bayreuth in der deutschen Presse 3 vols, vol. 2, Die Stimme der evangelische Kirche (Regensburg: Gustav Bosse, 1977): 54–7.
30 ‘First Performance of Wagner's Latest Opera’, The Musical Courier, 3 August 1882.
31 John R.G. Hassard, ‘How Wagner Makes Operas’, The Century, August 1882.
32 Charles Dudley Warner, ‘Wagner's Parsifal’, The Atlantic Monthly, January 1883.
33 Mariana van Rensselaer, ‘Parsifal at Baireuth [sic]’, Harper's Magazine, March 1883.
34 Van Rensselaer, ‘Parsifal at Baireuth [sic]’.
35 Marion Wilcox, ‘Parsifal at Bayreuth’, New Englander and Yale Review, January 1885.
36 ‘A Play and Some Operas’, The New York Sun, 1 April 1890.
37 ‘Parsifal’, The New York Sunday World, 16 March 1890.
38 ‘“Parsifal” in Brooklyn’, The Musical Courier, 2 April 1890.
39 This is recounted in Luke 7:36–38, in which the woman in question is simply ‘a woman in the city, who was a sinner’ (NRSV), and in John 12:1–8, when the woman is identified as Mary the sister of Martha and Lazarus, sometimes referred to as ‘Mary of Bethany’.
40 ‘Frau Wagner Protests’, The New York Times, 22 March 1903.
41 ‘Holds Parsifal Sacred’, The New York Sun, 25 August 1903.
42 ‘Asks Law to Stop “Parsifal”’, The Sun, 31 August 1903.
43 ‘First performance’, The Musical Courier, 3 August 1882.
44 Claudia Durst Johnson, Church and Stage: The Theatre as Target of Religious Condemnation in Nineteenth Century America (Jefferson, NC: MacFarland, 2008): 9–10.
45 Katherine Preston, Opera for the People (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017): 472–3.
46 Musser, Charles, ‘Passions and the Passion Play: Theatre, Film and Religion in America, 1880–1900’, Film History 5 (1994): 419Google Scholar.
47 Musser, ‘Passions and the Passion Play’, 425.
48 ‘A Passion Play Society’, The New York Dramatic Mirror, 17 January 1903.
49 ‘The Production of Parsifal’, The New York Dramatic Mirror, 12 September 1903.
50 ‘“Parsifal” and Sentiment’, The Musical Courier, 7 October 1903.
51 ‘“Parsifal” Proceedings’, The Musical Courier, 23 September 1903.
52 ‘That Sacred Parsifal’, The New York Sun, 2 September 1903.
53 ‘Presbytery Rejects a Clerical Candidate’, The New York Times, 15 April 1902.
54 ‘The “Parsifal” Attack’, The New York Times, 12 November 1903.
55 ‘Parsons to fight “Parsifal”’, The New York Sun, 11 November 1903.
56 ‘Parsons to fight “Parsifal”’.
57 ‘The Status of “Parsifal” Here’, The Musical Courier, 28 Oct 1903.
58 ‘The “Parsifal” Attack’, The New York Times, 12 November 1903.
59 ‘“Parsifal” and the Churches’, The New York Times, 12 November 1903.
60 ‘Asked to Stop “Parsifal”’, The New York Daily Tribune, 9 December 1903.
61 ‘Again Attacks “Parsifal”’, The New York Times, 19 December 1903.
62 ‘Vast Throng Hears “Parsifal”’, The New York Daily Tribune, 25 December 1903.
63 Katherine R. Syer, ‘Parsifal on Stage’, in A Companion to Wagner's Parsifal, ed. Kinderman and Syer, 284.
64 ‘The Man Higher Up’, The New York Evening World, 26 December 1903.
65 ‘Objections to “Parsifal”’, The Independent, 7 December 1903.
66 E.I. Prime-Stevenson, ‘Parsifal in New York?’, The Independent, 17 December 1903.
67 Friedrich Schleiermacher, On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers, trans. and ed. [of Über die Religion] Richard Crouter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996): 22.
68 Schleiermacher, On Religion, 68–9.
69 Carl Dahlhaus, The Idea of Absolute Music, trans. Roger Lustig (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989): 88.
70 Wilhelm Heinrich Wackenroder and Ludwig Tieck, Herzensergiessungen eines kunstliebenden Klosterbruders (Unger, 1797): 234–41.
71 ‘Parsifal and the Churches’, The New York Times, 27 December 1903.
72 ‘Between Acts at “Parsifal”’, The New York Sun, 27 December 1903.
73 Episcopal Rector, letter to the editor, The New York Times, 27 December 1903.
74 Charles Dudley Warner, ‘Wagner's Parsifal’, 76
75 Rev. H.R. Haweis, “Oratorio and Drama: A New Departure”, Harper's New Monthly Magazine, December 1889.
76 Frederic Spotts, Bayreuth: A History of the Wagner Festival (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994): 131.
77 H.W. Mabie, ‘“Parsifal” at Bayreuth’, The Outlook, 12 August 1889 (reprinted 28 November 1903).
78 ‘“Parsifal’ in New York”, The Outlook, 10 Oct 1903.
79 ‘The Performance of “Parsifal”’, The Outlook, 2 January 1904.
80 Williams, Rowan D., ‘Soteriology’, The Encyclopedia of Christianity (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008), 5: 124–5Google Scholar.
81 Welch, Claude, Protestant Thought in the Nineteenth Century 2 vols, vol 1: 1799–1870 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972): 77Google Scholar.
82 Dorn, Jacob Henry, Washington Gladden: Prophet of the Social Gospel (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1967): 185–8Google Scholar.
83 Dorn, Washington Gladden, 188.
84 Duffield, Howard, Parsifal: The Guileless Fool (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1904): 81–2Google Scholar.
85 Duffield, Parsifal, 46–8.
86 Gladden, Washington, The Church and Modern Life (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1903): 85Google Scholar.
87 Parsons, Albert Ross, Parsifal: The Finding of Christ Through Art; Or, Richard Wagner as Theologian (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1890): 77Google Scholar.
88 Gladden, Washington, Witnesses of the Light (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin & Co., 1903): 4Google Scholar.
89 Gladden, Witnesses of the Light, 200.
90 Gladden, Witnesses of the Light, 226.
91 Gladden, Witnesses of the Light, 227.
92 Newton, R. Heber, Parsifal: An Ethical and Spiritual Interpretation (Ocsawana-On-Hudson, NY: Upland Farms Alliance, 1904)Google Scholar, prefatory note.
93 William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience [1902] (New York: MacMillan, 1961): 89–92.
94 Braden, Charles Samuel, Spirits in Rebellion; the Rise and Development of New Thought (Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1963): 28Google Scholar.
95 Axel Emil Gibson, ‘Richard Wagner as Philosopher’, Mind, Feb 1905: 163–77.
96 Charles Braden, Spirits in Rebellion, 36; and Martin Marty, Pilgrims in Their Own Land, 332.
97 Braden, Spirits in Rebellion, 10–11.
98 Newton, Richard Heber, Parsifal: An Ethical and Spiritual Interpretation (Upland Farms Alliance, 1904): 35Google Scholar.
99 Newton, Parsifal, 37–38.
100 Newton, Parsifal, 5, 7.
101 Newton, Parsifal, 3.
102 Jim McPherson, ‘The Savage Innocents Part 2: On the Road with Parsifal, Butterfly, the Widow, and the Girl’, The Opera Quarterly 19/1 (January 1, 2003): 35–41.
103 Horowitz, Wagner Nights, 266.