Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-76l5x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T07:52:02.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two types of case variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2013

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson*
Affiliation:
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson, Department of Icelandic, University of Iceland, Árnagarði v. Suðurgötu, Reykjavík 101, Iceland. jj@hi.is
Get access

Abstract

Building on data from Icelandic, this article argues that there are two kinds of case variation, formal and semantic. The first type features lexical case as one of the variants whereas the second type involves structural vs. inherent case. The semantic effect found with the latter kind of variation follows from the semantic requirements associated with inherent case and these may cut across different uses of the same verb. It is also shown how the weak status of disappearing lexical case manifests itself in the grammar of Icelandic and Faroese.

Keywords

formal variationinherent caselexical casesemantic variationstructural case
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , May 2013 , pp. 5 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åfarli, Tor A. & Fjøsne, Eldfrid Haaker. 2012. Weak dative case in Norwegian dialect syntax. Studia Linguistica 66 (2), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Árnadóttir, Hlíf & Sigurðsson, Einar Freyr. 2012. Case in disguise. In Fernández & Etxepare (eds.), 96–143.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1993. Accusative and dative case of objects of some transitive verbs in Icelandic and the semantic distinction between them. In Flyktforsök: Kalasbok till Christer Platzack på femtioårsdagen 18 november 1993, från doktorander och dylika, 1–13. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2001. Case in Icelandic – A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach [Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A57]. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2011a. Lexical vs. structural case: A false dichotomy. Morphology 21, 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2011b. The rise of Dative Substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar account. Lingua 121, 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béjar, Susana & Diane, Massam. 1999. Multiple case checking. Syntax 2 (2), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björgvinsdóttir, Ragnheiður. 2003. Frumlagsfall í máli barna [Subject case in child language]. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Belletti, Adriana (ed.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3: Structures and Beyond, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, Maria Cristina. 2003. Datives at Large. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Erlingsdóttir, Gyða. 2010. Hún finnst ekki tannkrem gott. Um fallmörkun frumlaga í barnamáli [She doesn't like toothpaste: The case marking of subjects in child language]. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2002. Changes in subject case marking in Icelandic. In Lightfoot, David (ed.), Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, 196–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz & Etxepare, Ricardo (eds.). 2012. Variation in Datives: A Microcomparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friðriksson, Finnur. 2009. Language Change vs. Stability in Conservative Language Communities: A Case Study of Icelandic. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór. 1982. Um méranir: Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun [On Dative Substitution: An outline of a synchronic and a diachronic study]. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 4, 159–189.Google Scholar
Heimskringla. 1991. (Magnúss saga berfætts, Ólafs saga Tryggvasonar) Bergljót S. Kristjánsdóttir, Bragi Halldórsson, Jón Torfason & Örnólfur Thorsson (eds.). Reykjavík: Mál og menning.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Jeffrei. 1988–1989. Málsliga samsvarið í Færøske Folkesagn og Æventyr [The linguistic agreement in Færøske Folkesagn og Æventyr]. Fróðskaparrit 36–37, 57–67.Google Scholar
Ingason, Anton Karl. 2010. Productivity of non-default case. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 85, 65–117.Google Scholar
Íslendinga sögur. (Bolla þáttur Bollasonar, Eyrbyggja saga, Grettis saga, Hávarðar saga Ísfirðings, Vatnsdæla saga). 1985–1986. In Halldórsson, Bragi, Torfason, Jón, Tómasson, Sverrir & Thorsson, Örnólfur (eds.). Reykjavík: Svart á hvítu.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2000. Case and double objects in Icelandic. In Nelson, Diane & Foulkes, Paul (eds.), Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8, 71–94.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2003. Not so quirky: On subject case in Icelandic. In Brandner, Ellen & Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.), New Perspectives on Case Theory, 127–164. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2009a. Covert nominative and dative subjects in Faroese. Nordlyd 36 (2), 142–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2009b. Verb classes and dative objects in Insular Scandinavian. In Barðdal, Jóhanna & Chelliah, Shobhana (eds.), The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case, 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2011. Reflexive sig is an argument. In Strahan, Tanya (ed.), Relating to Reflexives: special issue of Nordlyd 37, 99–118.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2012. Dative versus accusative and the nature of inherent case. In Fernández & Etxepare (eds.), 144–160.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003. Breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku [Changes in subject case in Icelandic]. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 25, 7–40.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Variation in subject case marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28 (2), 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2011. Structured exceptions and case selection in Insular Scandinavian. In Simon, Horst & Wiese, Heike (eds.), Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in the Grammar, 213–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2002. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 24, 31–105.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas. 2004. The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax–Morphology Interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas. 2006. German inherent datives and argument structure. In Abraham, Werner, Hole, Daniel & Meinunger, André (eds.), Datives and Similar Cases, 49–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowenstein, Íris Edda. 2012. Mig langar sjálfri til þess. Rannsókn á innri breytileika í fallmörkun frumlaga [Me wants self to do that: An investigation of intra-speaker variation in subject case]. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. 2001. Færøysk i vestnordisk sprakhistorie [Faroese in West-Nordic language history]. In Braunmüller, Knut & Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon (eds.), Moderne lingvistiske teorier og færøsk, 125–154. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðardóttir, Herdís Þ. 2002. Fallmörkun í barnamáli: Hvernig læra íslensk börn að nota föll? [Case marking in child language: How do Icelandic children learn to use cases?]. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2011. On the New Passive. Syntax 14, 148–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2012. Minimalist C/case. Linguistic Inquiry 43, 191–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta. 1982. “Þágufallssýki” [Dative Sickness]. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 4, 19–62.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2002. Icelandic case and the structure of events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6, 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2006. Case alternations in the Icelandic passive. Ms., University of Tromsö.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2012. Ideal speakers and other speakers: The case of dative and some other cases. In Fernández & Etxepare (eds.), 161–188.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2004. Faroese: An Overview and Reference Grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.Google Scholar
Viðarsson, Heimir Freyr. 2009. Tilbrigði í fallmörkun aukafallsfrumlaga. Þágufallshneigð í forníslensku? [Variation in the case marking of oblique subjects: Dative Substitution in Old Icelandic?]. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 31, 15–66.Google Scholar
Weyhe, Eivind. 1996. Genitiven i færøske grammatikker – et problembarn [The genitive in Faroese grammar books: A problem child]. In Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt. Til Inger Ejskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, 309–320. Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzels forlag.Google Scholar
Wood, Jim. 2012. Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira, Maling, Joan & Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. Case in tiers. Language 63, 217–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3, 441–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar