Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:59:20.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short- and Long-Run Demand and Substitution of Agricultural Inputs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo
Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo*
Affiliation:
Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service (ERS), U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access

Extract

Short- and long-run Hicksian and Marshallian elasticities are estimated, along with Morishima elasticities of substitution, using a restricted profit function and a series of decomposition equations. Convexity in prices and concavity in quasi-fixed factors of the restricted profit function are simultaneously imposed using Bayesian techniques. The empirical model is disaggregated in the input side, utilizes a Fuss-quadratic flexible functional form, incorporates the impact of agricultural policies, and introduces a new weather index. The methodology is applied to Illinois's agriculture, and implications for agriculture in the Corn Belt and the Northeast are briefly discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , April 1992 , pp. 36 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The views expressed are the views of the author and do not necessarily represent policies or views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The author wishes to thank Charlie Hallahan from ERS for developing a computer program to impose inequalities using the Bayesian approach and Dick Shumway from Texas A&M University for providing a computer version of Romain's procedure for calculating expected prices of farm-program commodities. Valuable comments about earlier versions of this paper received from C.M. Gempesaw, M. Spilker, U. Vasavada, and H. Vroomen are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Antle, J.M. “The Structure of U.S. Agricultural Technology, 1910–78.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (1984):414–21.Google Scholar
Ball, V.E. “Modeling Supply Response in a Multiproduct Framework.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988):813–25.Google Scholar
Ball, V.E., and Chambers, R.G. “An Economic Analysis of Technology in the Meats Products Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics (1982):699–709.Google Scholar
Berndt, E.R., and Wood, D.O. “Engineering and Econometric Interpretations of Energy-Capital Complementarity.” American Economic Review 69 (1979):342–54.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H.P. “A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Elasticities of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56 (1974):377–86.Google Scholar
Blackorby, C., and Russell, R.B. “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen-Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities of Substitution).” American Economic Review 79 (1989):882–99.Google Scholar
Brown, R.S., and Christensen, L.R. “Estimating Elasticities in a Model of Partial Static Equilibrium: An Application to U.S. Agriculture.” In Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, edited by Berndt, E.R. and Field, B.C. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Burell, A. “The Demand for Fertilizer in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Agricultural Economics (1989):1–20.Google Scholar
Capalbo, S.M. “A Comparison of Econometric Models of U.S. Agricultural Productivity and Aggregate Technology.” In Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation, edited by Capalbo, S.M. and Antle, J.M. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1988.Google Scholar
Chalfant, J.A., and White, K.J. “Estimation of Demand Systems with Concavity and Monotonicity Constraints.” University of California, Berkeley, 1989. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Chalfant, J.A., Gray, R.S., and White, K.J. “Evaluating Previous Beliefs in a Demand System: The Case of Meat Demand in Canada.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (1991):476–90.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E. “Applications of Duality Theory.” In Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, edited by Intriligator, M.D. and Kendrick, D.A., vol. II. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co., 1974.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E., and Ostensoe, L. “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions.” In Dynamic Econometric Modeling, edited by Barnett, W., Berndt, E.R., and White, H. Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Evenson, R. “State-Level Data Set for U.S. Agriculture, 1948–1982.” Yale University, 1986. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Field, B.C., and Berndt, E.R. “An Introductory Review of Research on the Economics of Natural Resource Substitution.” In Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, edited by Berndt, E.R. and Field, B.C. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Fuss, M.A. “The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing.” Journal of Econometrics 5 (1977):89–116.Google Scholar
Gallant, A.R., and Golub, G.H. “Imposing Curvature Restrictions on Flexible Functional Forms.” Journal of Econometrics 26 (1984):295–321.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. “Exact Inference in the Inequality Constrained Normal Linear Regression Model.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 1 (1986):127–41.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. “Bayesian Inference in Econometric Models Using Montecarlo Integration.” Econometrica 57 (1989):1317–39.Google Scholar
Hazilla, M., and Kopp, R. “Imposing Curvature Restrictions on Flexible Functional Forms.” Discussion Paper QE85-04. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1985.Google Scholar
Hazilla, M., and Kopp, R. “Testing for Separable Functional Structure Using Temporary Equilibrium Models.” Journal of Econometrics 33 (1986):119–41.Google Scholar
Henrichmeyer, W. “CAP Reform and 1992: A German Perspective.” In EC 1992, edited by Gardiner, W.H. and Kelch, D.R. Staff Report no. AGES 9043. USDA, ERS, Washington, DC, 1990.Google Scholar
Hertel, T.W. “Inferring Long-Run Elasticities from a Short-Run Quadratic Profit Function.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 35 (1987):169–80.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. “Input Demand and Output Supply on Irish Farms—A Micro-economic Approach.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 13 (1986):477–93.Google Scholar
Houck, J.P., Abel, M.E., Ryan, M.E., Gallagher, P., Hoffman, R.G., and Penn, J.B. “Analyzing the Impact of Government Programs on Crop Acreage.” Technical Bulletin no. 1548. USDA, ERS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Huang, W., and Lantin, R.M. “A Comparison of Farmer Compliance Costs to Reduce Excessive Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Under Alternative Policy Options.” Selected paper presented at the 1991 meetings of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Dallas-Fort Worth, 1991.Google Scholar
Huy, B., Elterich, J.G., and Gempesaw, C.M. “Recent Changes in the Regional Structure of U.S. Dairy Production.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17 (1988):36–45.Google Scholar
Kang, H., and Brown, G.M. “Partial and Full Elasticities of Substitution and the Energy-Capital Complementarity Controversy.” In Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, edited by Berndt, E.R. and Field, B.C. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kloek, T., and van Dijk, H.K. “Bayesian Estimates of Equation System Parameters: An Application of Integration by Montecarlo.” Econometrica 46 (1978):1–19.Google Scholar
Koizumi, T. “A Further Note on Definition of Elasticity of Substitution in Many-Input Case.” Metroeconomica 28 (1976):152–55.Google Scholar
Lau, L.J. “A Characterization of the Normalized Restricted Profit Function.” Journal of Economic Theory 12 (1976):131–63.Google Scholar
Lau, L.J. “Applications of Profit Functions.” In Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, edited by Fuss, M. and McFadden, D., 133–216. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978.Google Scholar
Lee, L.K. “Farm Chemicals and Groundwater Quality.” Agricultural Outlook (May 1988):5–6.Google Scholar
Lim, H., and Shumway, C.R. “Profit Maximization, Returns to Scale, and Measurement Error.” Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Article no. 24401. Texas A&M University, 1989a.Google Scholar
Lim, H., and Shumway, C.R. “Separability in State-Level Agricultural Technology.” Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Article no. 25162. Texas A&M University, 1989b.Google Scholar
Lopez, R.E. “The Structure of Production and the Derived Demand for Inputs in Canadian Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 (1980):38–45.Google Scholar
Lopez, R.E. “Estimating Substitution and Expansion Effects Using a Profit Function Framework.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (1984):358–67.Google Scholar
Lucier, G., Chesley, A., and Ahearn, M. Farm Income Data: A Historical Perspective. USDA Statistical Bulletin 740. Washington, DC, 1986.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C.S., and Shumway, C.R. “Output Supply, Input Demand, Technology and Policy in California Agriculture.” Working paper, 1989.Google Scholar
Miller, R.H. “Ground Water Pollution: Research Strategies and Priorities.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 2 (1987):30–31.Google Scholar
Miranowski, J.A. “The Demand for Agricultural Crop Chemicals under Alternative Farm Program and Pollution Control Solutions.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1975.Google Scholar
Mood, A.M., Graybill, F.A., and Boes, D.C. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Y. “Elasticities of Substitution and the Theory of Derived Demand.” Review of Economic Studies 35 (1968):233–36.Google Scholar
OECD. “Agricultural and Environmental Policies: Opportunities for Integration.” Paris, 1989.Google Scholar
Poison, R. “Multiple Input, Multiple Output Production Choices and Technology in Southern Agriculture: Interstate Comparisons.” Ph.D. diss., Texas A&M University, 1989.Google Scholar
Ray, S.C. “A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture, 1939–77.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (1982):490–98.Google Scholar
Romain, R.F.J. “A Commodity Specific Policy Simulation Model for U.S. Agriculture.” Ph.D. diss., Texas A&M University, 1983.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.E., and Abel, M.E. “Supply Response of U.S. Sorghum Acreage to Government Programs.” Agricultural Economics Research 25 (1973):45–55.Google Scholar
Sakai, Y. “Substitution and Expansion Effects in Production Theory: The Case of Joint Production.” Journal of Economic Theory 9 (1974):225–74.Google Scholar
Shumway, C.R. “Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (1983):749–60.Google Scholar
Shumway, C.R., McIntosh, C.S., and Poison, R.A. “State-Level Output Supplies and Input Demands in Four Regions.” Preliminary Report to ERS/USDA, 22 December 1988.Google Scholar
Shumway, C.R., and Alexander, W.P. “Agricultural Product Supplies and Input Demands: Regional Comparisons.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988):153–61.Google Scholar
Taylor, T.G., and Gupta, G. “How Misleading Can Allen Elasticities of Substitution Be?” Selected paper presented at the 1990 AAEA Meetings in Vancouver, Canada, 1990.Google Scholar
Teigen, L.D., and Singer, F. Weather in U.S. Agriculture: Monthly Temperature and Precipitation by State and Farm Producing Region, 1950–88. Statistical Bulletin 789. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
Thompson, L.M. “Weather and Technology in the Production of Soybeans in the Central United States.” Agronomy Journal 62(1970).Google Scholar
Thompson, L.M. “Climatic Change, Weather Variability and Corn Production.” Agronomy Journal 78 (1986):649–53.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices. Annual summaries. Washington, DC, 1950–86.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, DC, 1950–86.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: State Financial Summary. Washington, DC, 1988.Google Scholar
van Dijk, H.K., and Kloek, T. “Further Experience in Bayesian Analysis Using Montecarlo Integration.” Journal of Econometrics 29 (1980):307–28.Google Scholar
Vroomen, H. “Fertilizer Use and Price Statistics, 1960–88.” Statistical Bulletin 780. USDA, ERS, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
Vroomen, H., and Larson, B. “A Direct Approach for Estimating Nitrogen, Phosphorous, and Land Demands at the Regional Level.” Technical Bulletin no. 1786. USDA, ERS, 1991.Google Scholar
Weaver, R.D. “Multiple Input, Multiple Output Production Choices and Technology in the U.S. Wheat Region.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (1983):45–55.Google Scholar